Citation network
Bivens Vs. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
broad a federal court's discretion concerning equitable remedies, it is absolutely clear -- at least after Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
equitable relief depends on the presence of a substantive right derived from federal law. Compare Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
U. S. 99 , 326 U. S. 105 -107 (1945), with Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSearch
-
to effectuate the congressional policy underpinning the substantive provisions of the statute. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSearch
-
Tunstall v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Cf. Amos v. UnitedSearch
-
Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Gambino v. UnitedSearch
-
Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
See Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment, Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Boilermakers v. HardemanSearch
-
See Nixon v. CondonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. StandardSearch
-
the Congress. Wheeldin v. WheelerSearch
-
Cf. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSearch
-
See McLoughlin v. NewSearch
-
McGuire v. UnitedSearch
-
Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Bell v. HoodSearch
-
Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Compare Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial