Citation network
Linkletter Vs. Walker
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1965
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
victims of illegal searches to seek reparation for the violation of their privacy. Some pursued the same. See Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
the Mapp exclusionary rule should, therefore, be given the same dignity and effect. Two cases are cited, Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Linkletter v. WalkerSearch
-
Chicot Drainage Dist. v. BaxterSearch
-
of Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
of the Court. In Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
England v. LouisianaSearch
-
Great Northern Ry. Co. v. SunburstSearch
-
Norton v. ShelbySearch
-
Bingham v. MillerSearch
-
Gelpcke v. CitySearch
-
Kuhn v. FairmontSearch
-
United States v. SchoonerSearch
-
Carpenter v. WabashSearch
-
Vandenbark v. Owens-IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. JonesSearch
-
and James v. UnitedSearch
-
Commissioner v. WilcoxSearch
-
Lustig v. UnitedSearch
-
Rochin v. PeopleSearch
-
Irvine v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
of Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
of Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. CahanSearch
-
Wolf. See Irvine v. CaliforniaSearch
-
People v. DeforeSearch
-
Wilson v. SchnettlerSearch
-
of the Amendment, Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
and Reck v. PateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial