Skip to content


Railway Express Agency, Inc., Vs. United States - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

355 U.S. 270

Appellant

Railway Express Agency, Inc.,

Respondent

United States

Excerpt:


railway express agency, inc., v. united states - 355 u.s. 270 (1957) u.s. supreme court railway express agency, inc., v. united states, 355 u.s. 270 (1957) 355 u.s. 270 railway express agency, inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 557. decided december 16, 1957. 153 f. supp. 738, affirmed. r. j. fletcher, r. e. johnson and james v. lione for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, robert w. ginnane and h. neil garson for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, and bernard g. segal, irving r. segal and s. harrison kahn for the united parcel service, inc., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. carson v. city of washington court house, ohio, 355 u.s. 270 (1957) 355 u.s. 270 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court carson v. city of washington court house, ohio, 355 u.s. 270 (1957) 355 u.s. 270 carson v. city of washington court house, ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 583. decided december

Judgment:


RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC., v. UNITED STATES - 355 U.S. 270 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 270 (1957) 355 U.S. 270

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 557.
Decided December 16, 1957.

153 F. Supp. 738, affirmed.

R. J. Fletcher, R. E. Johnson and James V. Lione for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Bernard G. Segal, Irving R. Segal and S. Harrison Kahn for the United Parcel Service, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


CARSON v. CITY OF WASHINGTON COURT HOUSE, OHIO, <a href="/99139"> 355 U.S. 270 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 270 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court CARSON v. CITY OF WASHINGTON COURT HOUSE, OHIO, 355 U.S. 270 (1957) 355 U.S. 270

CARSON v. CITY OF WASHINGTON COURT HOUSE, OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 583.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

J. Harvey Crow for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 270, 271




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //