Skip to content


Chicago and a R. Co. Vs. U S - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

212 U.S. 563

Appellant

Chicago and a R. Co.

Respondent

U S

Excerpt:


chicago & a r. co. v. u s - 212 u.s. 563 (1909) u.s. supreme court chicago & a r. co. v. u s, 212 u.s. 563 (1909) 212 u.s. 563 chicago & alton railway company, petitioner, v. united states no. 238. john n. faithorn, petitioner, v. united states no. 239. fred a. wann, petitioner, v. united states no. 240. january 4, 1909 messrs. f. s. winston, robert mather, john barton payne, s. h. strawn, ralph m. shaw, and blackburn esterline for petitioners. the attorney general and the solicitor general for respondent. judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the district court of the united states for the northern district of illinois.[ chicago & a r co v. u s 212 u.s. 563 (1909) ]

Judgment:


CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S - 212 U.S. 563 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court CHICAGO & A R. CO. v. U S, 212 U.S. 563 (1909)

212 U.S. 563

CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 238.

JOHN N. FAITHORN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 239.

FRED A. WANN, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 240.

January 4, 1909

Messrs. F. S. Winston, Robert Mather, John Barton Payne, S. H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and Blackburn Esterline for petitioners.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for respondent.

Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.[ Chicago & A R Co v. U S 212 U.S. 563 (1909) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //