Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. AsiruddIn Sarkar, on Behalf of the Firm of Abed Ali Tufani

Emperor vs AsiruddIn Sarkar, on Behalf of the Firm of Abed Ali Tufani

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 17, 1921
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/879696
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

AsiruddIn Sarkar, on Behalf of the Firm of Abed Ali Tufani

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1921Cal118,62Ind.Cas.412
Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 137 - order for removal of obstruction--no finding as to bona fides of claim set up--order, validity of--witnesses, cross examination of, arbitrary limit of time fixed for, effect of. - .....of criminal procedure by the learned sessions judge of pabna, it is directed against an order made or purporting to be made under the provisions of section 137, criminal procedure code, by the sub divisional magistrate of serajgunge. by this order he directs the removal of two obstructions to a certain drain or water channel, one such obstruction being a wall north to south for a distance of nine feet from the northern extremily thereof, another a wall running east and west along the bed of the channel. the reference is made on a number of grounds, game of which do not appear to be well founded. but we are of opinion that we must accept the reference and set aside the orders to which we have referred on two grounds, namely, that the sub-divisional magistrate appears to have fixed an arbitrary limit of time, namely, five minutes for the cross examination of the witnesses and, secondly, on the ground that he comes to no altar findings as to the bona fides of the claim set up by the second party, that is to say, the party against whom the order is directed.2. for these reasons we set aside the order and direct that the proceedings be taken up at the point reached on the 15th.....

Full Judgment

1. This case comes before us on a reference made under the provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the learned Sessions Judge of Pabna, It is directed against an order made or purporting to be made under the provisions of Section 137, Criminal Procedure Code, by the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Serajgunge. By this order he directs the removal of two obstructions to a certain drain or water channel, one such obstruction being a wall north to south for a distance of nine feet from the northern extremily thereof, another a wall running east and west along the bed of the channel. The reference is made on a number of grounds, game of which do not appear to be well founded. But we are of opinion that we must accept the reference and set aside the orders to which we have referred on two grounds, namely, that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate appears to have fixed an arbitrary limit of time, namely, five minutes for the cross examination of the witnesses and, secondly, on the ground that he comes to no altar findings as to the bona fides of the claim set up by the second party, that is to say, the party against whom the order is directed.

2. For these reasons we set aside the order and direct that the proceedings be taken up at the point reached on the 15th December and that the case be re-tried and heard and disposed of in accordance with law. the re trial will take plane in the Court of a stipendiary Magistrate exercising the powers of a Magistrate of the First Class at the Headquarters Station of the District of Pabna such Magistrate to be nominated by the District Magistrate.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial