service - eligibility for appoint
ment - article 226 of constitution of
india - ex-
service man elig
ible for post ad
vertised for selection in
life insurance corporation - final date
mentioned in
advertisement -
petitioners continuing in
air force even after cut off date - cannot be deemed as ex-
servicemen on such date - held,
petitioners inelig
ible to get appoint
ment. - - it
could be
shown to this hon'ble
court at the
time of
arguments if so
required'.
learned counsel for the
petitioners,
however,
failed to
produce the
legible copy of the
advertisement in spite of this fact
brought to the
notice of this
court on
last date of
hearing, i......
holding brief of sri u. s. tiwari,
learned counsel for the
petitioners and sri manish goel,
advocate,
on behalf of the sole
respondent.2. the brief facts of the case are that
petitioners (mohd. ilyas khan, santosh kumar pandey, som nath rai and jai narain) claim to have been
discharged from
defence services-indian
air force w.e.f. 31.8.1993, as stated in para 1 of the writ
petition.3. before their
discharge from the
defence services,
petitioners applied against the
advertisement dated 7.12.1992 issued by the
life insurance corporation of india (for short called 'the
corporation'). the copy of the said
advertisement is not on record of the case.
petitioners contended themselves by stating that 'the said
advertisement being
illegible is not being filed here. it could be shown to this hon'ble court at the time of
arguments if so
required'.
learned counsel for the
petitioners,
however, failed to produce the
legible copy of the
advertisement in spite of this fact brought to the notice of this court on last date of
hearing, i.e., 24.11.2000.4.
petitioners submit that they had received
letters for appearing in the
examination/
interview proposed by the
corporation. it may be stated that.....
ORDERA.K. Yog, J.
1. Heard Sri Satish Chandra Misra, advocate, holding brief of Sri U. S. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Manish Goel, advocate, on behalf of the sole respondent.
2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioners (Mohd. Ilyas Khan, Santosh Kumar Pandey, Som Nath Rai and Jai Narain) claim to have been discharged from defence services-Indian Air Force w.e.f. 31.8.1993, as stated in para 1 of the writ petition.
3. Before their discharge from the defence services, petitioners applied against the advertisement dated 7.12.1992 issued by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short called 'the Corporation'). The copy of the said advertisement is not on record of the case. Petitioners contended themselves by stating that 'the said advertisement being illegible is not being filed here. It could be shown to this Hon'ble Court at the time of arguments if so required'. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, failed to produce the legible copy of the advertisement in spite of this fact brought to the notice of this Court on last date of hearing, i.e., 24.11.2000.
4. Petitioners submit that they had received letters for appearing in the examination/interview proposed by the Corporation. It may be stated that these petitioners had applied for t