P.C.N.M. Abdul Wahab Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Others - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

constitution of india, 1950 article 226 wakf (amendment) act, 2013 section 68 entitlement to relief petitioner has sought for direction to respondents to take appropriate action under section 68 of act, by considering his representation. court held representation of petitioner has not been disposed of so far therefore, without expressing any view on merits and claim made by petitioner, fourth respondent is directed to consider representation of petitioner and pass orders on same on merits and in accordance with law petition disposed of. (para: 2) .....under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 to 4 to take appropriate action under section 68 of the wakf (amendment) act, 2013 by consider the petitioner's representation, dated 27.04.2016 and thereby handover the possession and records of the wakf, namely, dindigul town, haji p.c.naina mohamed rowther vedachandur mohamedia theru, chinna masjid manbaul hasanath madrasa dharmam to the petitioners within a time frame as fixed by this court.) 1. the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 2 to 4 to take appropriate action under section 68 of the wakf act, by considering his representation, dated 24.04.2016. 2. the grievance of the petitioner is that such representation of the petitioner has not been disposed of so far. therefore, without expressing any view on the merits and the claim made by the petitioner, i only direct the fourth respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.04.2016, and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law also by hearing and all the interested parties. such exercise shall be done by the fourth respondent within a period of.....