Skip to content


Hester Vs. Illinois - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

397 U.S. 660

Appellant

Hester

Respondent

illinois

Excerpt:


hester v. illinois - 397 u.s. 660 (1970) u.s. supreme court hester v. illinois , 397 u.s. 660 (1970) 397 u.s. 660 lee arthur hester, petitioner, v. state of illinois. no. 82. supreme court of the united states october term, 1969. april 27, 1970 marshall kaplan, chicago, ill., for petitioner. joel m. flaum, chicago, ill., for respondent. on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of illinois. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. mr. justice douglas, mr. justice brennan, and mr. justice marshall dissent.[ hester v. illinois 397 u.s. 660 (1970) ]

Judgment:


HESTER v. ILLINOIS - 397 U.S. 660 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court HESTER v. ILLINOIS , 397 U.S. 660 (1970)

397 U.S. 660

Lee Arthur HESTER, petitioner,
v.
State of ILLINOIS.
No. 82.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1969.

April 27, 1970

Marshall Kaplan, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

Joel M. Flaum, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL dissent.[ Hester v. Illinois 397 U.S. 660 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //