Skip to content


Whitney Stores, Inc. Vs. Summerford - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

393 U.S. 9

Appellant

Whitney Stores, Inc.

Respondent

Summerford

Excerpt:


whitney stores, inc. v. summerford - 393 u.s. 9 (1968) u.s. supreme court whitney stores, inc. v. summerford, 393 u.s. 9 (1968) 393 u.s. 9 whitney stores, inc., et al. v. summerford et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of south carolina. no. 85. decided october 14, 1968. 280 f. supp. 406, affirmed. e. n. zeigler for appellants. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. hornbeak v. hamm, 393 u.s. 9 (1968) 393 u.s. 9 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court hornbeak v. hamm, 393 u.s. 9 (1968) 393 u.s. 9 hornbeak v. hamm, commissioner of revenue for alabama. appeal from the united states district court for the middle district of alabama. no. 260. decided october 14, 1968. 283 f. supp. 549, affirmed. barry hess for appellant. macdonald gallion, attorney general of alabama, and willard w. livingston and herbert i. burson, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice steward are of the opinion that proba

Judgment:


WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD - 393 U.S. 9 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968) 393 U.S. 9

WHITNEY STORES, INC., ET AL. v. SUMMERFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 85.
Decided October 14, 1968.

280 F. Supp. 406, affirmed.

E. N. Zeigler for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


HORNBEAK v. HAMM, <a href="/101886"> 393 U.S. 9 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 9 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court HORNBEAK v. HAMM, 393 U.S. 9 (1968) 393 U.S. 9

HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 260.
Decided October 14, 1968.

283 F. Supp. 549, affirmed.

Barry Hess for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWARD are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.

Page 393 U.S. 9, 10




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //