Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ferrante Vs. City of New York

Ferrante vs City of New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-10-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101322

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 9
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ferrante

Respondent

City of New York

Excerpt

ferrante v. city of new york - 385 u.s. 9 (1966) u.s. supreme court ferrante v. city of new york, 385 u.s. 9 (1966) 385 u.s. 9 ferrante v. city of new york et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 277. decided october 10, 1966. appeal dismissed. henry mark holzer for appellant. j. lee rankin for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 385 u.s. 9, 10 united states v. ohio, 385 u.s. 9 (1966) 385 u.s. 9 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court united states v. ohio, 385 u.s. 9 (1966) 385 u.s. 9 united states v. ohio. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 271. decided october 10, 1966. certiorari granted; 354 f.2d 549 , reversed. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general douglas, morton hollander and j. f. bishop for the united states. william b. saxbe, attorney general of ohio, and gerald a. donahue, first assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. wickard v. filburn, 317 u.s. 111 .

Full Judgment

FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK - 385 U.S. 9 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 9 (1966) 385 U.S. 9

FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 277.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Henry Mark Holzer for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 9, 10


UNITED STATES v. OHIO, <a href="/101322"> 385 U.S. 9 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 9 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. OHIO, 385 U.S. 9 (1966) 385 U.S. 9

UNITED STATES v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 271.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 354 F.2d 549 , reversed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 .



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial