Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: supplemental answerCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix F
Title: Supplemental Proceedings
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....for his personal appearance before the Court, until such time as the said suit shall be fully and finally disposed of, and until satisfaction of any decree that may be passed against him in the suit. given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this .................... day of .................... 19.../20.... . Judge No. 2 security for appearance of a defendant arrested before judgment (O. XXXVIII, r. 2) (Title) whereas at the instance of ..............., the plaintiff in the above suit, . .................... the defendant, has been arrested and brought before the Court; And whereas on the failure of the said defendant to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance, the; Court has ordered, him to furnish such security: Therefore I, .................... have voluntarily become surety and do hereby bind myself, my heirs and executors, to the said Court that the said defendant shall appear at any time when called upon, while, the suit is pending and until satisfaction, of any decree that may be passed against him in the said suit ; and in default of such appearance I bind Myself; my heirs and executors, to pay to the said.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRepresentation of the People Act, 1951 Section 95
Title: Answering of Criminating Questions and Certificate of Indemnity
State: Central
Year: 1951
.....of any criminal proceeding for perjury in respect of the evidence, be admissible in evidence against in any civil or criminal proceeding. (2) When a certificate of indemnity has been granted to any witness, it may be pleaded by him in any Court and shall be a full and complete defence to or upon any charge under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or Part VII of this Act arising out of the matter to which such certificate relates, but it shall not be deemed to relieve him from any disqualification in connection with an election imposed by this Act or any other law. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 47 of 1966, Section 42, for "the Tribunal" w.e.f. 14-12-1966.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 132
Title: Witness Not Excused from Answering on Ground That Answer Will Criminate
State: Central
Year: 1872
A witness shall not be excused from answering any question as to any matter relevant to the matter in issue in any suit or in any civil or criminal proceeding, upon the ground that the answer to such question will criminate, or may lend directly or indirectly to criminate, such witness, or that it will expose, or tend directly or indirectly to expose, such witness to a penalty or forfeiture of any kind: Proviso.Provided that no such answer, which a witness shall be compelled to give, shall subject him to any arrest or prosecution, or be proved against him in any criminal proceeding, except a prosecution for giving false evidence by such answer.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDisputed Elections (Prime Minister and Speaker) Act, 1977 Section 13
Title: Answering of Criminating Questions and Certificate of Indemnity
State: Central
Year: 1977
.....indemnity from the Authority; and (b) an answer given by a witness to a question put by or before the Authority shall not, except in the case of any criminal proceeding for perjury in respect of the evidence, be admissible in evidence against him in any civil or criminal proceeding. (2) When a certificate of indemnity has been granted to any witness, it may be pleaded by him in any court shall be a full and complete defence to or upon any charge under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860.) or Part VII of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951.), arising out of the matter to which such certificate relates, but it shall not be deemed to relieve him from any disqualification in connection with an election imposed by this Act or any other law.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionEducation Act, 1983 Section 27
Title: Alteration of the Answers Written at an Examination, Etc.
State: Karnataka
Year: 1983
No person shall,- (a) save in accordance with the rules or orders governing the conduct of an examination,- (i) change, modify, vary or alter the answers written by an examinee at such examination; or (ii) introduce additional answer books or sheets into an answer script or remove or substitute the answer scripts or any part thereof; (b) intentionally or knowingly,- (i) make incorrect entries in an answer script or marks register or marks card; or (ii) total or retotal wrongly the marks obtained by any candidate; or (iii) feed wrong data to the computer, intending thereby to wrongfully increase or decrease the marks awarded or to be awarded to the examinee at an examination.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 148
Title: Court to Decide when Question Shall Be Asked and when Witness Compelled to Answer
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....seriously affect the opinion of the Courts as to the credibility of the witness on the matter to which testifies; (2) Such questions are improper if the imputation which they convey relates to matters so remote in time, or of such a character, that the truth of the imputation would not affect, or would effect in a slight degree, the opinion of the Court as to the credibility of the witness on the matter to which he testifies; (3) Such questions are improper if there is a great disproportion between the importance of the imputation made against the witness's character and the importance of his evidence; (4) The Court may, if it sees fit, draw, from the witness's refusal to answer, the inference that the answer if given would be unfavourable.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 153
Title: Exclusion of Evidence to Contradict Answers to Questions Testing Veracity
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....of his previous conviction. Exception 2.If a witness is asked any question tending to impeach his impartiality, and answers it by denying the facts suggested, he may be contradicted. Illustrations (a) A claim against an underwriter is resisted on the ground of fraud. The claimant is asked whether, in a former transaction, he had not made a fraudulent claim. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim. The evidence is inadmissible. (b) A witness is asked whether he was not dismissed from a situation for dishonesty. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed for dishonesty. The evidence is not admissible. (c) A affirms that on a certain day he saw B at Lahore. A is asked whether he himself was not on that day at Calcutta. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that A was on that day at Calcutta. The evidence is admissible, not as contradicting A on a fact which affects his credit, but as contradicting the alleged fact that B was seen on the day in question in Lahore. In each of these cases the witness might, if his denial was false, be charged with giving false evidence. (d) A is asked whether.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Section 171
Title: Corporation May Pass Supplemental Budget
State: Karnataka
Year: 1976
The Corporation may, on the recommendation of the standing committee for 1 [taxation, finance and appeals] 2[in the case of corporations other than the corporation of the city of Bangalore and the standing committee for taxation and finance in the case of corporation of the city of Bangalore], during the year pass a supplemental budget estimate for the purpose of meeting any special or unforeseen requirements, arising during that year; so however that the estimated cash balance under General Account-Revenue at the close of the year shall not be reduced to less than one lakh of rupees: Provided that no item shall be included in the supplemental budget which had been disallowed by the Government while sanctioning the Budget. _________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 35 of 1994. Notification bringing it into force not available. 2. Inserted by Act 27 of 1998 w.e.f. 21-11-1998.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 349
Title: Imprisonment or Committal of Person Refusing to Answer or Produce Document
State: Central
Year: 1973
If any witness or person called to produce a document or thing before a Criminal Court refuses to answer such question as are put to him or to produce any document or thing in his possession or power which the Court requires him to produce, and does not, after a reasonable opportunity has been given to him so to do, offer any reasonable excuse for such refusal such Court may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, sentence him to simple imprisonment or by warrant under the hand of the Presiding Magistrate or Judge commit him to the custody of an officer of the Court for any term not exceeding seven days, unless in the meantime, such person consents to be examined and to answer, or to produce the document or thing and in the event of his persisting in his refusal he may be dealt with according to the provisions of section 345 of section 346.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionGift-tax Act, 1958 [Cease to Have Effect on or After the 01.10.1998] Section 17A
Title: Penalty for Failure to Answer Questions, Sign Statements, Furnish Information, Allow Inspection, Etc
State: Central
Year: 1958
.....course of any proceedings under this Act, which a gift-tax authority may legally require him to sign; or (c) to whom a summons is issued under sub-section (1) of section 36, either to attend to give evidence or produce books of account or other documents at a certain place and time, omits to attend or produce the books of account or documents at the place and time, he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than five hundred rupees but which may extend to ten thousand for each such default or failure: Provided that no penalty shall be impossable under clause (c) if the person proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. (2) If a person fails to furnish in due time any statement or information which such person is bound to furnish to the Assessing Officer under section 37, he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than one hundred rupees but which may extend to two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues: Provided that no penalty shall be imposable under this sub-section if the person proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. (3) Any penalty impossable under sub-section.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial