Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: summary action or proceeding Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 390 results (0.012 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialMulti-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Section 110
Title: Minutes of Proceedings of General Meetings and of Board and Other Meetings
State: Central
Year: 2002
.....of the meeting. (6) In the case of a meeting of the board or of a committee of the board, the minutes shall also contain-- (a) the names of the members of the board present at the meeting; and (b) in the case of each resolution passed at the meeting, the names of the members of the board, if any, dissenting from, or not concurring in, the resolution. (7) Nothing contained in sub-sections (1) to (6) shall be deemed to require the inclusion in any such minutes of any matter which, in the opinion of the chairperson of the meeting-- (a) is, or could reasonably be regarded as, defamatory of any person; (b) is irrelevant or immaterial to the proceedings; or (c) is detrimental to the interests of the multi-State co-operative society. Explanation.-- The chairperson shall exercise an absolute discretion in regard to the inclusion or non-inclusion of any matter in the minutes on the grounds specified in this sub-section.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMultistate Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 2002
MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 2002 MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 2002 39 of 2002 3rd July, 2002 An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to co-operative societies, with objects not confined to one State and serving the interests of members in more than one State, to facilitate the voluntary formation and democratic functioning of co-operatives as people's institutions based on self-help and mutual aid and to enable them to promote their economic and social betterment and to provide functional autonomy and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Be it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:- SECTION 01: SHORT TITLE, EXTENT AND COMMENCEMENT (1) This Act may be called the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. (2) It extends to the whole of India. (3) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint and different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Act and any reference in any such provision to the commencement of this Act shall be construed as a reference to the coming into force of that.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMulti-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Chapter XV
Title: Miscellaneous
State: Central
Year: 2002
.....Act. Section 121 - Certain Act not to apply (1) The provisions of the Companies Act, 1956(1 of 1956) and the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969(54 of 1969) shall not apply to the multi-State co-operative societies. (2) The multi-State co-operative societies registered or deemed to be registered under the provisions of this Act shall not indulge in monopolistic and restrictive trade practices as defined in the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969). Section 122 - Central Governments power to give directions to specified multi-State co-operative societies in public interest If the Central Government is satisfied that in the public interest or for the purposes of securing proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programmes approved or undertaken by the Central Government or to secure proper management of the business of the specified multi-State co-operative societies generally or for preventing the affairs of such society being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of the members, any depositors or creditors thereof, it is necessary to issue directions to any class of specified.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog Adhiniyam, 2002 Complete Act
State: Chattisgarh
Year: 2002
.....and proof, of the misbehaviour or incapacity of the Pramukh Lokayukt and Lokayukt under sub-section (1) shall be as provided in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 (Act No. 51 of 1968), in relation to the removal of a Judge and accordingly, the provisions of this Adhiniyam shall, subject to necessary modifications apply in relation to the removal of Pramukh Lokayukt and Lokayukt as they apply in relation to the removal of a Judge. Section 6 - Matters that may be enquired into by Lok Aayog Subject to the provisions of this Adhiniyam, upon receiving specific information of misconduct or a complaint against the Chief Minister, a Minister or any other public servant, the Lok Aayog may proceed to inquire into the matter contained therein. Section 7 - Matters not subject to inquiry (1) Except hereinafter provided, Lok Aayog shall not conduct any inquiry under this Adhiniyam in the case of complaint in respect of any action if such action relates to any matter specified in the Third Schedule. (2) Lok Aayog shall not inquire into any action,- (a) in respect of which a formal and public inquiry has been ordered under the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1950 (Act No. 37 of 1950);.....
List Judgments citing this sectionPublic Interest Disclosure (Protection of Informers) Act, 2002 Section 9
Title: Time Limit Forcompletion of Inquiry
State: Central
Year: 2002
(1) The Competent Authority shall hold every such inquiry as expeditiously as possible and in any case complete the inquiry within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of the complaint: Provided that if the Competent authority is of opinion that the inquiry cannot be completed before the said period, it may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the said period and in no case the said period shall be extended beyond a period of two years from the date of receipt of the complaint. (2) Nothing contained in sub section (1) shall operate as a bar against initiation or continuance of any action or proceedings under any other law for the time being in force against the public servant named in the complaint.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPublic Interest Disclosure (Protection of Informers) Act, 2002 Section 14
Title: Burden of Proof Incertain Cases
State: Central
Year: 2002
Where the Competent Authority conducts inquiry into an application under sub section (3) of section 10, the burden of proving that such action or proceeding which is the subject of victimization would have been taken even if no disclosure had been made by the applicant,shall be upon such public servant or public authority against whom allegation of vitimisation has been made.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPrevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 [Repealed] Section 57
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Central
Year: 2002
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Central Government or a State Government or any officer or authority of the Central Government or State Government or any other authority on whom powers have been conferred under this Act, for anything which is in good faith done or purported to be done in pursuance of this Act: Provided that no suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against any serving member or retired member of the armed forces or other para-military forces in respect of any action taken or purported to be taken by him in good faith, in the course of any operation directed towards combating terrorism.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSuppression of Unlawful Acts Against Safety of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms on Continental Shelf Act, 2002 Section 14
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Central
Year: 2002
(1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of the provisions of this Act. (2) No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Central Government for any damage caused or likely to be caused for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of the provisions of this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBiological Diversity Act, 2002 Section 54
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Central
Year: 2002
1 54. Protection of action taken in goodfaith.-- No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against the CentralGovernment or the State Government or any officer of the Central Government orthe State Government or any member, officer or employee of the NationalBiodiversity Authority or the State Biodiversity Board for anything which is ingood faith done or intended to be done under this Act or the rules orregulations made thereunder. _____________________ 1. Effective from 01.10.2003
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCompetition Act, 2002 Section 59
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Central
Year: 2002
159. Protection of action taken in good faith .-- No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Central Government or Commission or any officer of the Central Government or the Chairperson or any Member or the Director-General, Additional, Joint, Deputy or Assistant Directors General or 2[the Secretary or officers or other employees of the Commission or the Chairperson, Members, officers and other employees of the Appellate Tribunal] for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder. _______________________ 1. Effective from 19.06.2003 by Notification No. SO 715 (E) Dated 19.06.2003. 2. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the words "the Registrar or officers or other employees of the Commission", w.e.f. 12.10.2007.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial