Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 8087 of the compiled general laws of 1927 Page 1 of about 69,409 results (0.055 seconds)Comptroller and Auditor-generals (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service), Act, 1971 Section 15
Title: Functions of Comptroller and Auditor-general in the Case of Grants or Loans Given to Other Authorities or Bodies
State: Central
Year: 1971
.....body or authority receiving such grant or loan. (2) Except where he is authorised so to do by the President, the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory having a Legislative Assembly, as the case may be, the Comptroller and Auditor-General shall not have, while exercising the powers conferred on him by sub-section (1), right of access to the books and accounts of any corporation to which any such grant or loan as is referred to in sub-section (1) is given if the law by or under which such corporation has been established provides for the audit of the accounts of such corporation by an agency other than the Comptroller and Auditor-General: Provided that no such authorisation shall be made except after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General and except after giving the concerned corporation a reasonable opportunity of making representations with regard to the proposal to give to the Comptroller and Auditor-General right of access to its books and accounts.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAdministrators-general (Maharashtra) Amendment Act, 2001, (Maharashtra) Section 2
Title: Amendment of Section 9 of Act 45 of 1963
State: Maharashtra
Year: 2001
In section 9 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, in its application to the State of Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as "the principal Act"), in subsection (1), clause (a) for the words "two lakhs" the words "ten lakhs" shall be substituted.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAdministrators-general and Official Trustees (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1982, (Maharashtra) Section 2
Title: Amendment of Section 43 of Act Xlv of 1963
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1982
To section 43 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 (XLV of 1963), in its application to the State of Maharashtra, the following proviso shall be added, namely :-- "Provided that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930 (Bom. XXV of 1930), the State Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, direct that all or any of the accounts of the Administrators-General for the State, for such period or periods, and in such manner, as may be specified in the order, shall be audited by an officer or officers deputed by the Chief Auditor, Local Fund Accounts, and shall be certified by him or them as provided in section 44."
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks Laws) Amendment Act, 2007 Section 11
Title: Amendment of Section 21
State: Central
Year: 2007
Section 21 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act shall be numbered as sub-section (1) thereof and after sub-section (1) as so numbered, the following sub-sections shall be inserted, namely:-- "(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), it shall be lawful for a subsidiary bank to keep the register of shareholders in computer floppies or diskettes or any other electronic form subject to such safeguards as may be prescribed. (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), a copy of, or extract from, the register of shareholders, certified to be a true copy under the hand of any officer of the subsidiary bank authorised in this behalf shall in all legal proceedings, be admissible in evidence.".
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka] General Clauses Act, 1899 Section 3
Title: Definitions
State: Karnataka
Year: 1899
.....and] (d) any provision contained in 2 [any 1 [Mysore Act or Karnataka Act]] or in any such Act or body of Rules as aforesaid 6 [or in any Bombay Act, Coorg Act, Hyderabad Law or Madras Act]; (13) "Father," in the case of any one whose personal law permits adoption, shall include an adoptive father; 7 [(13A) "financial year" or "official year" shall mean the year commencing on the first day of April: Provided that in respect of the financial or official year of 1949-50, "financial Year" or "Official year" shall mean the period commencing on the first day of July, 1949, and ending with the thirty-first day of March, 1950;] (14) "8 [revenue year]" shall mean the year commencing on the first day of July; (15) a thing shall be deemed to be done in "good faith" where it is in fact done honestly, whether it is done negligently or not; 2 [(16) "Government or "the Government" shall,- (a) in relation to anything done before the commencement of the Constitution, means the authority or person authorised at the relevant date to administer executive Government in Mysore; (b) in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the Constitution, include both.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay General Clauses Act, 1904, (Maharashtra) Section 3
Title: Definitions
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1904
..... NOTES Good faith.-See section 2(7) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, section 52 of the Indian Penal Code and section 178 of the Indian Contract Act. An ex parte decree was passed on February 12, 1935 by Ahmednagar Court and it was transferred to Poona Court on February 25, 1935. The decree was set aside on January 15, 1936. Again an ex parte decree was passed in 1936. No darkhast for execution of the subsequent decree was filed till June, 16, 1947, but four darkhasts were filed successively in Poona Court to execute the earlier decree of 1935 and were disposed off in 1936, 1939, 1942 and 1946 respectively. A fifth darkhast was filed in 1946 to execute the earlier decree and an application made in 1947 to amend the darkhast so as to execute the subsequent decree. It was held, that the decree holder was not entitled to claim relief under section 14(2) of the Indian Limitation Act as the previous darkhasts were not prosecuted in good faith.-Sadashiv Shivramv. Govind Sadashiv, I. L. R. 1954 Bom. 1173 : AIR 1955 Bom. 93 : 55 Bom. L. R. 785; Balkrishnayya v. LingaRao, 1943 Mad. 804 (Dist.). Bona fides.-Meaning.-'Bonafides' is mental state negativing fraud or dishonesty. It.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay General Clauses Act, 1904, (Maharashtra) Section 25
Title: Continuation of Orders, Etc., Issued Under Enactments Repealed and Re
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1904
.....by a Bombay Act 1[or Maharashtra Act] with or without modification, then, unless it is otherwise expressly provided, any appointment, notification, order, scheme, rule, by-law or form made or issued under the repealed enactment shall, so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions re-enacted, continue in force, and be deemed to have been made or issued under the provisions so re-enacted, unless and until it is superseded by any appointment, notification, order, scheme, rule, by-law or form made or issued under the provisions so re-enacted. NOTES Repealed Notification.-It was held that the Notification even if it continued in force because of the application of section 25 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904, extended the ordinance and not the Act. In the result, the connection made by the State that the Act had been extended to areas other than those mentioned in section 15 of the Bombay Building (Control of Erection) Act, 1948 to the extent that cinema theatres are concerned fail, because the Notification cannot lend any support whatever to it.- State of Bombay v. Pandurang Vinayak, I. L. R. 1951 Bom. 271 : AIR 1951 Bom. 263 : 52 Bom. L. R. 852 : 1957 Mah. L. R......
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay General Clauses Act, 1904, (Maharashtra) Section 7
Title: Effect of Repeal
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1904
.....Pandurang, I. L. R. 1960 Bom. 172 : 1959 Bom. L. R. 1112; Sakharam Narayan v. Manikchand, 1955 (57) Bom.. L. R. 223 followed. Repeal of rules when new rules framed.-Framing of new octroi rules would repeal earlier one by necessary implication even though some other rules were repealed specifically.-Swastik Rubber Products Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation for the City of Poona, 1981 (4) SCC 219 : AIR 1981 SC 2022. When a temporary Act lapses, the rules and orders made thereunder expire.-State of Bombay v. Heman Shantilal, AIR 1952 Bom. 16. Section 7(1) of the Act would be applicable to the repeal of Poona City Municipal Corporation, rule 5(8) of the Exemption Rules and the consequences stated therein must follow, unless there is something in the repealed rule itself which ends the exemption.-Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation for the City of Poona, 1969 Man. L. J. 832. Repealed Notification.-It was held that the Notification even if it continued in force because of the application of section 25 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904, extended the Ordinance and not the Act. In the result, the connection made by the State that the Act had been.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay General Clauses Act, 1904, (Maharashtra) Section 17
Title: Substitution of Functionaries
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1904
.....executed. (2) This section applies also to all Bombay Acts made before the commencement of this Act. NOTES Commissioner of Police.-The Assistant Commissioner of Police was a functionary who could, by virtue of section 17 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, discharge the functions of the Commissioner under section 6 (1) of the Gambling Act in the matter of issuing a special warrant.-Janardhan v. State of Maharashtra, 1978 (2) SCC 465 : 1978 SCC (Criminal) 277 : AIR 1978 SC 1234. Section 17 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 makes it clear that where any officer or office is invested with powers or functions under any State Act, such powers and functions can be validly exercised by any person who holds such post or office from time to time.-Engineering and Metal Workers Union v. Commissioner of Labour, 2003 (4) Bom. C.R. 804 : 2003 (2) All M.R. 528. ____________________________ 1. These words were inserted by the Maharashtra Adaptation of Laws (State and Concurrent Subjects) Order, 1960.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay General Clauses Act, 1904, (Maharashtra) Section 21
Title: Power to Make to Include Power to Add To, Amend, Vary or Rescind, Orders, Etc.
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1904
Where, by any Bombay Act 1[or Maharashtra Act], a power to issue notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws is conferred, then that power includes a power, exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like sanction and conditions (if any), to add to, amend, vary or rescind any notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws, so issued. NOTES Provisions of the section apply to administrative order but not to authority exercising judicial functions.-Trustees of Seth Mulrqj Khatau Trust v. Ramjio Govind, 1965 Mah. L. J. 90. Extension of the period of order.-That the power to make an order under section 37(3) of the Bombay Police Act must include a power to add to, amend, vary or rescind such an order.-Bapurao Dhondiba Jagtap v. State, AIR 1956 Bom. 300 : 58 Bom. L. R. 418. Section 5 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 read with sections 14 and 21 of the Bombay General Clauses Act vest enough power in the Director to close an existing market and establish it elsewhere.- Rameshchandra Kachardas Porwal v. State, AIR 1981 SC 1127. In the case of Dunstan Savio Mcness @ Tony (Mr.) & Ors. v. R. H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police & Ors.,.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>