Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 482 Page 1 of about 55,901 results (0.022 seconds)Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482
Title: Saving of Inherent Power of High Court
State: Central
Year: 1973
Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCompanies Act, 1956 Section 482
Title: Order Made in Any Court to Be Enforced by Other Courts
State: Central
Year: 1956
Any order made by a Court for, or in me course of, winding up a company shall be enforceable at any place in India, other than, that over which such Court has jurisdiction, by the Court which would have had jurisdiction in respect of the company if its registered office had been situate at such other place, and in the same manner in all respects as if the order had been made by that Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 482
Title: Punishment for Using a False Property Mark
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever uses1[***] any false property mark shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.] ________________________ 1. The words "any false trade mark or" omitted by Act 43 of 1958, section 135 and Schedule (w.e.f. 25-11-1959).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Section 482
Title: Institution of Suits Against Municipal Authority, Officers and Agents
State: Karnataka
Year: 1976
.....or any person acting under the direction of the same, in respect of any act done in pursuance or in execution, or intended execution of this Act or any rule, bye-law, regulation or order made under it or in respect of any alleged neglect or default in the execution of this Act or any rule, bye-law, regulation or order made under it until the expiration of 2 [sixty days] after a notice has been delivered or left at the corporation office or at the place of abode of such officer, servant or person, stating the cause of action , the relief sought, and the name and place of abode of the intending plaintiff, and the plaint shall contain a statement that such notice has been so delivered or left. 3 [(1A) A suit to obtain an urgent or immediate relief against the corporation or any municipal authority, corporation officer or servant in respect of any act done or purporting to de done by such officer or servant in his official capacity, may be instituted with the leave of the court, without serving any notice as required by sub-section (1), but the court shall not grant relief in the suit, whether interim or otherwise except after giving to the corporation officer or servant,.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCentral Provinces Court of Wards Act, 1899 Section 39
Title: Exercise of Discretion Not to Be Questioned in Civil Court
State: Central
Year: 1899
No suit shall be brought in any Civil Court in respect of the exercise of any discretion conferred by this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCentral Provinces Court of Wards Act, 1899 Section 41
Title: Application of the Act to Estates of Rulers of Indian States
State: Central
Year: 1899
1[41. Application of the Act to estates of Rulers of Indian States The powers and functions conferred on the State Government by or under this Act shall, in relation to the estates of Rulers of Indian States, be the powers and functions of the Central Government. __________________________ 1. Inserted by C.O. 29.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInfant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 10
Title: Special Provision Relating to Employees of Person Who Produces, Supplies, Distributes or Sells Infant Milk Substitutes, Etc
State: Central
Year: 1992
(1) No person who produces, supplies, distributes or sells infant milk substitutes or feeding bottles or infant foods shall fix the remuneration of any of his employees or give any commission lo such employees on the basis of the volume of sale of such substitutes or bottles or foods made by such employees. (2) The employees of such person shall not perform any function which relates to educating a pregnant woman or mother of an infant on pre-natal or post-natal care of the infant.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInfant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 13
Title: Power to Seize Infant Milk Substitutes, Etc., or Containers Thereof,
State: Central
Year: 1992
(1) If any food inspector or authorised officer has reason to believe that in respect of any infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof, the provisions of this Act have been or are being contravened, he may seize such substitute or bottle or food or container. (2) No such substitute or food or bottle or container shall be retained by any food inspector or authorised officer for a period exceeding ninety days from the date of its seizure unless the approval of the District Judge, within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such seizure has been made, has been obtained for such retention.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInfant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 14
Title: Confiscation
State: Central
Year: 1992
Any infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof, in respect of which any provision of this Act has been or is being contravened, shall be liable to confiscation: Provided that where it is established to the satisfaction of the court adjudging the confiscation that the person in whose possession, power or control any such substitute or bottle or food or container is found is not responsible for the contravention of the provisions of this Act, the court may, instead of making an order for the confiscation of such substitute or bottle or food or container, make such other order authorised by this Act against the person guilty of the breach of the provisions of this Act as it may think fit.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInfant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation Ofproduction, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 Section 15
Title: Power to Give Option to Pay Cost in Lieu of Confiscation
State: Central
Year: 1992
(1) Whenever any confiscation is authorised by this Act, the court adjudging it may, subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order adjudging the confiscation, give to the owner thereof an option to pay in lieu of confiscation such cost not exceeding the value of the infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container thereof in respect of which the confiscation is authorised as the court thinks fit. (2) On payment of the cost ordered by the court the seized infant milk substitute or feeding bottle or infant food or container shall be returned to the person from whom it was seized on the condition that such person shall, before making any distribution, sale or supply of such substitute or bottle or food or container, give effect to the provisions of this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>