Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 194 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 22 results (0.002 seconds)

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 194

Title: Giving or Fabricating False Evidence with Intent to Procure Conviction of Capital Offence

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever gives or fabricates false evidence, intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, any person to be convicted of an offence which is capital1[by the law for the time being in force in2[India] shall be punished with3[imprisonment for life], or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; if innocent person be thereby convicted and executed.-- and if an innocent person be convicted and executed in consequence of such false evidence, the person who gives such false evidence shall be punished either with death or the punishment hereinbefore described. ______________________ 1. Substituted by the A.O. 1948, for "by the law of British India or England". 2. Substituted by Act 3 of 1951, section 3 and Schedule, for "the States". 3. Substituted by Act 26 of 1955, section 117 and Schedule, for "transportation for life" (w.e.f. 1-1-1956).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 194

Title: Relation Between Principal and Person Duly Appointed by Agent to Act in Business of Agency

State: Central

Year: 1872

Where an agent, holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal in the business of the agency, has named another person accordingly, such person is not a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for such part of the business of the agency as is entrusted to him. Illustration (a) A directs B, his solicitor, to sell his estate by auction, and to employ an auctioneer for the purpose. B names C, an auctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a sub-agent, but is A's agent for the conduct of the sale. (b) A authorizes B, a merchant in Calcutta, to recover the moneys due to A from C & Co. B instructs D, a solicitor, to take legal proceedings against C & Co. for the recovery of the money. D is not a sub-agent, but is solicitor for A.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 1924 Section 194

Title: Boundary Walls, Hedges and Fences

State: Central

Year: 1924

.....with the consent or under the3[orders of the Executive Officer], or which was in existence at the commencement of this Act, the4[Board] shall make compensation for any damage caused by the removal thereof, (3) The5[Executive Officer] may, by notice in writing, require the owner, lessee or occupier of any such land to cut or trim any hedge on the land in such manner and within such time as may be specified in the notice. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 113, for "Board" w.e.f. 1-10-1983. 2. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 113, for "A Board" w.e.f 1-10-1983. 3. Substituted by Act 15 of 9183, section 113, for "orders of the Board" w.e.f. 1-10-1983. 4. Substituted by Act 24 of 1936, section 69, for "Cantonment Authority" 5. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 113, for "Board" w.e.f. 1-10-1983.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 194

Title: Procedure

State: Central

Year: 1925

If the District Judge is satisfied that there is sufficient ground for believing as aforesaid but not otherwise, he shall summon the party complained of, and give notice of vacant or disturbed possession by publication, and, after the expiration of a reasonable time, shall determine summarily the right to possession (subject to a suit as hereinafter provided) and shall deliver possession accordingly: Provided that the Judge shall have the power to appoint an officer who shall take an inventory of effects, and seal or otherwise secure the same, upon being applied to for the purpose, without delay, whether he shall have concluded the inquiry necessary for summoning the party complained of or not.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Government of India Act, 1935 [Repealed] Section 194

Title: Appeal by State to Railway Tribunal from Certain Directions of Railway Authority

State: Central

Year: 1935

1 [194. Appeal by State to Railway Tribunal from Certain Directions of Railway Authority If the Authority, in the exercise of any executive authority of the Federation in relation to interchange of traffic, or maximum or minimum rates and fares, or station or service terminal charges, give any direc-tion to a Federated State, the State may complain that the direction discriminates unfairly against, the railways of the State ,or imposes on the State an obligation to afford facilities which are not in the circumstances reasonable, and any such complaint shall be determined by the Railway Tribunal. ________________________ 1. Omitted, by the India (Provisional Constitution) Order, 1947.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Army Act, 1950 Section 194

Title: Repeals

State: Central

Year: 1950

[Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1957 (36 of 1957), sec. 2 and Sch. I.]

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Air Force Act, 1950 Section 194

Title: Powers of British Officer

State: Central

Year: 1950

A British officer shall have all the powers conferred by this Act on an officer of corresponding rank or holding a corresponding appointment.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Companies Act, 1956 Section 194

Title: Minutes to Be Evidence

State: Central

Year: 1956

1 [194. Minutes to he evidence Minutes of meetings kept in accordance with the provisions of section 193 shall be evidence of the proceedings recorded therein.] ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 65 of 1960, Section 53, for section 194 (w.e.f. 28-12-1960).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 Section 194

Title: General Offences Against Discipline

State: Central

Year: 1958

A seaman lawfully engaged or an apprentice shall be guilty of an offence against discipline if he commits any of the following acts, namely:- (a) if he quits the ship without leave after her arrival at her port of delivery and before she is placed in security; (b) if he is guilty of wilful disobedience to any lawful command or neglect of duty; (c) if he is guilty of continued wilful disobedience to lawful commands or continued wilful neglect of duty; (d) if he assaults the master or any other1[officer of or a seaman or an apprentice belonging to, the ship]; (e) if he combines with any of the crew to disobey lawful commands or to neglect duty or to impede the navigation of the ship or retard the progress of the voyage; (f) if he wilfully damages his ship or commits criminal misappropriation or breach of trust in respect of, or wilfully damages any of, her stores or cargo. ________________________ 1. Substituted for the words "officers of the ship" by Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act (41 of 1984), Section 16 (15-7-85).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 194

Title: Dividends

State: Central

Year: 1961

.....or to any of the four companies (hereafter in this proviso referred to as such company), formed by virtue of the schemes framed under sub-section (1) of section 16 of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (57 of 1972), in respect of any shares owned by the Corporation or such company or in which the Corporation or such company has full beneficial interest; (c) any other insurer in respect of any shares owned by it or in which it has full beneficial interest;] 3[Provided also that no such deduction shall be made in respect of any dividends referred to in section 115-O.] _____________________________________ 1. Substituted for first and second provisos by the Finance Act, 2002, with effect from 1st June, 2002. Prior to substitution, first and second provisos as amended by the Finance Act, 1997, with effect from 1st June, 1997, stood as under: Provided that no such deduction shall be made in the case of a shareholder, being an individual, of a company in which the public are substantially interested, if - (a) the dividend is paid by such company by an account payee cheque; and (b) the amount of such dividend or, as the case may be, the.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //