Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: sea captainSign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialIndian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 (26 of 1925) Preamble 1
Title: Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....-- ___________________ 1. The Act has been extended to the new Provinces and Merged States by the Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949 (59 of 1949), section 3, (w.e.f. 1-1-1950) and to the Union Territories of Manipur, Tripura and Vindhya Pradesh by the Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 (30 of 1950), section 3 (w.e.f 16-4-1950). Vindhya Pradesh now forms part of State of Madhya Pradesh -- See Act 37 of 1956, section 9(1)(e); but Manipur and Tripura are States now -- See Act 81 of 1971. It has now been extended to the Union Territories of -- (1) Goa, Daman and Diu by Reg. 12 of 1962. (2) Pondicherry by Reg. 7 of 1963 (w.e.f. 1-10-1963). (3) Lakshadweep Islands by Reg. 8 of 1965 and Act 34 of 1973. 2. Words "including the delegates representing His majesty" omitted by Act 52 of 1964, section 3 and Schedule II (w.e.f. 29-12-1964). 3. Substituted by Act 52 of 1964, section 3 and Schedule II, for Paras 3 and 4 (w.e.f. 29-12-1964).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 (26 of 1925) Complete Act
Title: Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 (26 of 1925)
State: Central
Year: 1925
Preamble1 - INDIAN CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT, 1925 Section1 - Short title and extent Section2 - Application of rules Section3 - Absolute warranty of seaworthiness not to be implied in contracts to which rules apply Section4 - Statement as to application of rules to be included in bills of lading Section5 - Modification of Article VI of Rules in relation to goods carried in sailing ships and by prescribed routes Section6 - Modification of rules 4 and 5 of Article III in relation to bulk cargoes Section7 - Saving and operation Schedule1 - RULES RELATING TO BILLS OF LADINGS
List Judgments citing this sectionEMPLOYEE'S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 Section 15A
Title: Special provisions relating to captains and other members of crew of aircrafts
State: Central
Year: 1923
.....in any case to prove the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed any such deposition and a certificate by such person that the defendant or the person accused had an opportunity of cross-examining the witness and that the deposition if made in a criminal proceeding was made in the presence of the person accused shall, unless the contrary is proved, be sufficient evidence that he had that opportunity and that it was so made.] ___________________________ 1. Ins. by Act 30 of 1995, sec. 8 (w.e.f. 15-9-1995). 2. Substituted by the Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 [Act No. 45 of 2009] to be effective from 23rd December, 2009 previous text was:- "Workmen"
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAir Force Act, 1950 Section 64
Title: Disobedience of Lawful Command of Captain of Aircraft
State: Central
Year: 1950
Any person subject to this Act who, whatever his rank, commits any of the following offences, that is to say,-- (a) while he is in an aircraft disobeys any lawful command given by the captain of the aircraft, whether such captain is subject to this Act or not, as respects all matters relating to the flying or handling of the aircraft, or affecting the safety thereof; or (b) being the captain of a glider aircraft towed by another aircraft disobeys any lawful command given by the captain of the towing aircraft, whether the latter is subject to this Act or not, as respects all matters aforesaid; shall, on conviction by court-martial, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNavy Act, 1957 Section 55 D
Title: Disobedience of Lawful Command of Captain of an Aircraft
State: Central
Year: 1957
1[55D. Disobedience of lawful command of captain of an aircraft Every person subject to naval law, who while he is in an aircraft belonging to or in the use of the Government, disobeys any lawful command given by the captain of the aircraft, whether such captain is subject to naval law or not, in relation to all matters relating to flying or handling of the aircraft or affecting the safety thereof, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such other punishment as is hereinafter mentioned.] ________________________ 1. Inserted by the Navy (Amdt.) Act, 1974 (53 of 1974), Section 14 (15-12-1974).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCoast Guard Act, 1978 Section 31
Title: Disobedience of Lawful Command of Captain of an Aircraft
State: Central
Year: 1978
Any person subject to this Act; who while he is in an aircraft belonging to or in the service of the Coast Guard, disobeys any lawful command given by the captain of the aircraft whether such captain is subject to this Act or not, in relation to all matters relating to flying or handling of the aircraft or affecting the safety thereof, shall, on conviction by a Coast Guard Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil) Rules, 1974 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1974
.....which are being loaded and water round the ship's side shall be inspected to ascertain that no oil is escaping; (c) if loading is proceeding satisfactorily, the rate of loading may be gradually increased until the desired loading rate is obtained; (d) after obtaining the desired rate of loading, a further inspection shall be made of the tank being loaded and water around ship's side for detecting any possible escape of oil; (e) only such number of tanks may be loaded simultaneously as could be safely watched and controlled; (f) the depth of oil in each cargo tank which is being loaded shall be constantly watched and the receiving rate shall be appropriately reduced towards the final stages of loading; (g) to allow time for orderly control, the slowing down of receiving rate that may be necessary during the topping off process shall be anticipated and appropriate notice given to the shore staff ; (h) after any tank valve been closed, the liquid level in the tank shall be checked to ensure that the valve is properly closed. (4) Before commencement of unloading operations, the tanker shall be inspected to ensure that (a) all cargo deck line valves, sea valves and any stern.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCarriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....(b) fire. unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier: (c) perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable waters: (d) act of God; (e) act of war; (f) act of public enemies: (g) arrest or restraint of princes, rulers of people, or seizure under legal process; (h) quarantine restriction; (i) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods, his agent, or representative; (j) strikes or lock-outs or stoppage or restraint of labour from whatever cause, whether partial or general; (k) riots and civil commotions; (1) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea; (m) wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss or damage arising from inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods; (n) insufficiency of packing; (o) insufficiency or inadequacy of marks; (p) latent defects not discoverable by due diligence; (q) any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or neglect of the.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 (26 of 1925) Schedule 1
Title: Rules Relating to Bills of Ladings
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....fire, unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier; (c) perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable waters; (d) act of God; (e) act of war; (f) act of public enemies; (g) arrest or restraint of princes, rulers of people, or seizure under legal process; (h) quarantine restriction; (i) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods, his agent, or representative; (j) strikes or lock-outs or stoppage or restraint of labour from whatever cause, whether partial or general; (k) riots and civil commotions; (l) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea; (m) wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss or damage arising from inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods; (n) insufficiency of packing; (o) insufficiency or inadequacy of marks; (p) latent defects not discoverable by due diligence; (q) any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRailways Act, 1989 Section 111
Title: Extent of Liability of Railway Administration in Respect of Accidents at Sea
State: Central
Year: 1989
.....and accidents of the seas, rivers and navigation of whatever nature and kind shall, without being expressed, be deemed to be part of the contract, and, subject to that condition, the railway administration shall, irrespective of the nationality or ownership of the ship used for the carriage by sea, be responsible for any loss of life, personal injury or loss of or damage to goods which may happen during the carriage by sea, to the extent to which it would be responsible under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958), if the ships were registered under that Act and the railway administration were owner of the ship and not to any greater extent. (2) The burden of proving that any such loss, injury or damage as is mentioned in sub-section (1) happened during the carriage by sea shall lie on the railway administration.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial