Bare Act Search Results

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 101

Title: Rules of Construction Where Will Purports to Make Two Bequests to Same Person

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....intended to make the second bequest instead of or in addition to the first; if there is nothing in the Will to show what he intended, the following rules shall have effect in determining the construction to be put upon the Will: (a) If the same specific thing is bequeathed twice to the same legatee in the same Will or in the Will and again in the codicil, he is entitled to receive that specific thing only. (b) Where one and the same Will or one and the same codicil purports to make, in two places, a bequest to the same person of the same quantity or amount of anything, he shall be entitled to one such legacy only. (c) Where two legacies of unequal amount are given to the same person in the same Will, or in the same codicil, the legatee is entitled to both. (d) Where two legacies, whether equal or unequal in amount, are given to the same legatee, one by a Will and the other by a codicil, or each by a different codicil, the legatee is entitled to both legacies. Explanation: In clauses (a) to (d) of this section, the word "Will" does not include a codicil. Illustrations (i) A, having ten shares, and no more, in the Imperial Bank of India, made his Will, which contains.....

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 157

Title: Order of Payment Where Portion of Fund Specifically Bequeathed to One Legatee, and Legacy Charged on Same Fund to Another, and Testator Having Received Portion of That Fund, Remainder Insufficient to Pay Both Legacies

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....extent in payment of the demonstrative legacy, and the rest of the demonstrative legacy shall be paid out of the general assets of the testator. Illustration A bequeaths to B 1,000 rupees, part of the debt of 2,000 rupees due to him from W. He also bequeaths to C 1,000 rupees to be paid out of the debt due to him from W. A afterwards receives 1 [500] rupees, part of that debt, and dies leaving only 1,500 rupees due to him from W. Of these 1,500 rupees, 1,000 rupees belong to B, and 500 rupees are to be paid to C. C is also to receive 500 rupees out of the general assets of the testator. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 10 of 1927, section 2 and Schedule I, for "5,000".

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 204

Title: Bar to Appointment of Second Curator for Same Property

State: Central

Year: 1925

If the Judge of any district has appointed a curator, in respect of the whole of the property of a deceased person, such appointment shall preclude the Judge of any other district within the same State from appointing any other curator, but the appointment of a curator in respect of a portion of the property of the deceased shall not preclude the appointment within the same State of another curator in respect of the residue or any portion thereof: Provided that no Judge shall appoint a curator or entertain a summary proceeding in respect of property which is the subject of a summary proceeding previously instituted under this Part before another Judge: Provided, further, that if two or more curators are appointed by different Judges for several parts of an estate, the High Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the appointment of one curator of the whole property.

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 216

Title: Grantee of Probate or Administration Alone to Sue, Etc., Until Same Revoked

State: Central

Year: 1925

After any grant of probate or letters of administration, no other than the person to whom the same may have been granted shall have power to sue or prosecute any suit, or otherwise act as representative of the deceased, throughout the State in which the same may have been granted, until such probate or letters of administration has or have been recalled or revoked.

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 40

Title: Where Intestate Leaves Lineal Descendants Not All in Same Degree of Kindred to Him, and Those Through Whom the More Remote Are Descended Are Dead

State: Central

Year: 1925

(1) If the intestate has left lineal descendants who do not all stand in the same degree of kindred to him, and the persons through whom the more remote are descended from him are dead, the property shall be divided into such a number of equal shares as may correspond with the number of the lineal descendants of the intestate who either stood in the nearest degree of kindred to him at his decease, or, having been of the like degree of kindred to him, died before him, leaving lineal descendants who survived him. (2) One of such shares shall be allotted to each of the lineal descendants who stood in the nearest degree of kindred to the intestate at his decease; and one of such shares shall be allotted in respect of each of such deceased lineal descendants; and the share allotted in respect of each of such deceased lineal descendants shall belong to his surviving child or children or more remote lineal descendants, as the case may be; such surviving child or children or more remote lineal descendants always taking the share which his or their parent or parents would have been entitled to respectively if such parent or parents had survived the intestate. Illustrations (i) A had

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 123

Title: One of Two Separate and Independent Bequests to Same Person May Be Accepted, and Other Refused

State: Central

Year: 1925

Where a will contains two separate and independent bequests to the same person, the legatee is at liberty to accept one of them and refuse the other, although the former may be beneficial and the latter onerous. Illustration A, having a lease for a term of years of a house at a rent which he and his representatives are bound to pay during the term, and which is higher than the house can be let for, bequeaths to B the lease and a sum of money. B refuses to accept the lease. He will not by this refusal forfeit the money.

Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....(b) fire. unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier: (c) perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable waters: (d) act of God; (e) act of war; (f) act of public enemies: (g) arrest or restraint of princes, rulers of people, or seizure under legal process; (h) quarantine restriction; (i) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods, his agent, or representative; (j) strikes or lock-outs or stoppage or restraint of labour from whatever cause, whether partial or general; (k) riots and civil commotions; (1) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea; (m) wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss or damage arising from inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods; (n) insufficiency of packing; (o) insufficiency or inadequacy of marks; (p) latent defects not discoverable by due diligence; (q) any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or neglect of the.....

Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 (26 of 1925) Schedule 1

Title: Rules Relating to Bills of Ladings

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....fire, unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier; (c) perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable waters; (d) act of God; (e) act of war; (f) act of public enemies; (g) arrest or restraint of princes, rulers of people, or seizure under legal process; (h) quarantine restriction; (i) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods, his agent, or representative; (j) strikes or lock-outs or stoppage or restraint of labour from whatever cause, whether partial or general; (k) riots and civil commotions; (l) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea; (m) wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss or damage arising from inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods; (n) insufficiency of packing; (o) insufficiency or inadequacy of marks; (p) latent defects not discoverable by due diligence; (q) any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or.....

Provident Funds Act, 1925 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....policy. In order to rive effect to these suggestions and also to certain other minor points it is considered desirable to amend the existing Act and to re-enact it in a consolidated form." -Gazette of India. 1924, Part V, p. 122. Amending Act 46 of 1975; At present every retired Central Service Class I officer entitled to pension is prohibited from taking up commercial employment before the expiry of two years from the date of his retirement unless he obtains the previous sanction of the President for taking up such employment. If such a pensioner accents any commercial employment without the previous sanction of the President. no pension is payable to him in respect of any period for which he is so employed or for such longer period as The President may direct [vide rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1972.] 2. In the interest of purity of administration. it is considered necessary to impose similar restrictions, with suitable safeguards in the case also of members of Central Ser- vices Class I entitled to the benefits of a contributory Provident Fund. For this purpose. the Bill seeks to amend the Provident Funds Act. 1925. 3. The Bill seeks to achieve.....

Succession Act, 1925 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1925

.....under this section or exempted from the operation of any of the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1865(10 of 1865), under section 332 of that Act are in this Act referred to as "exempted persons". PART 02 OF DOMICILE SECTION 04: APPLICATION OF PART This Part shall not apply if the deceased was a Hindu, Muhammadan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jaina. SECTION 05: LAW REGULATING SUCCESSION TO DECEASED PERSON'S IMMOVABLE AND MOVABLE PROPERTY, RESPECTIVELY (1) Succession to the immovable property in India of a person deceased shall be regulated by the law of India, wherever such person may have had his domicile at the time of his death. (2) Succession to the movable property of a person deceased is regulated by the law of the country in which such person had his domicile at the time of his death. SECTION 06: ONE DOMICILE ONLY AFFECTS SUCCESSION TO MOVABLES A person can have only one domicile for the purpose of the succession to his movable property. SECTION 07: DOMICILE OF ORIGIN OF PERSON OF LEGITIMATE BIRTH The domicile of origin of every person of legitimate birth is in the country in which at the time of his birth his father was domiciled; or, if he is a posthumous.....