Bare Act Search Results

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 97 to 106

Title: Resistance of Delivery of Possession to Decree-holder or Purchaser

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....(including questions relating to right, title or interest in the property) arising between the parties to a proceeding on an application under rule 97 or rule 99 or their representatives, and relevant to the adjudication of the application, shall be determined by the Court dealing with the application, and not by a separate suit and for this purpose, the Court shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law for the time being in force, be deemed to have jurisdiction to decide such questions.] 2[102. Rules not applicable to transferee pendente lite Nothing in rules 98 and 100 shall apply to resistance or obstruction in execution of a decree for the possession of immovable property by a person to whom the judgment-debtor has transferred the property after the institution of the suit in which the decree was passed or to the dispossession of any such person. Explanation.--In this rule, "transfer" includes a transfer by operation of law.] 2[103. Orders to be treated as decrees Where any application has been adjudicated upon under rule 98 or rule 100, the order made thereon shall have the same force and be subject to the same conditions as.....

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 74

Title: Resistance to Execution

State: Central

Year: 1908

Resistance to execution Where the Court is satisfied that the holder of a decree for the possession of immovable property or that the purchaser of immovable property sold in execution of a decree has been resisted or obstructed in obtaining possession of the properly by the judgment-debtor or some person on his behalf and that such resistance or obstruction was without any just cause, the Court may, at the instance of the decree-holder or purchaser, order the judgment-debtor or such other person to be detained in the civil prison for a term which may extend to thirty days and may further direct that the decree-holder or purchaser be put into possession of the properly.

Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 Section 6

Title: Resistance to the Taking Measurements, Etc

State: Central

Year: 1920

(1) If any person who under this Act is required to allow his measurements or photograph to be taken resists or refuses to allow the taking of the same, it shall be lawful to use all means necessary to secure the taking thereof. (2) Resistance to or refusal to allow taking of measurements or photograph under this Act shall be deemed to be an offence under section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860).

Railways Act, 1989 Section 155

Title: Entering into a Compartment Reserved or Resisting Entry into a Compartment Not Reserved

State: Central

Year: 1989

(1) If any passenger-- (a) having entered a compartment wherein no berth or seat has been reserved by a railway administration for his use, or (b) having unauthorisedly occupied a berth or seat reserved by a railway administration for the use of another passenger, refuses to leave it when required to do so by any railway servant authorised in this behalf, such railway servant may remove him or cause him to be removed, with the aid of any other person, from the compartment, berth or seat, as the case may be, and he shall also be punishable with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees. (2) If any passenger resists the lawful entry of another passenger into a compartment not reserved for the use of the passenger resisting, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 183

Title: Resistance to the Taking of Property by the Lawful Authority of a Public Servant

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever offers any resistance to the taking of any properly by the lawful authority of any public servant, knowing or having reason to believe that he is such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 224

Title: Resistance or Obstruction by a Person to His Lawful Apprehension

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself for any offence with which he is charged or of which he has been convicted, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained for any such offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Explanation.--The punishment in this section is in addition to the punishment for which the person to be apprehended or detained in custody was liable for the offence with which he was charged, or of which he was convicted.

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 225

Title: Resistance or Obstruction to Lawful Apprehension of Another Person

State: Central

Year: 1860

.....of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; or, if the person to be apprehended or rescued, or attempted to be rescued, is under sentence of death, shall be punished with 1 [imprisonment for life] or imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 26 of 1955, section 117 and Schedule, for "transportation for life" (w.e.f. 1-1-1956). 2. The words "or to" omitted by Act 36 of 1957, section 3 and Schedule II (w.e.f. 17-9-1957). 3. The words "transportation" omitted by Act 26 of 1955, section 117 and Schedule (w.e.f. 1-1-1956). 4. The words "penal servitude" omitted by Act 17 of 1949, section 2 (w.e.f. 6-4-1949).

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 225B

Title: Resistance or Obstruction to Lawful Apprehension, or Escape or Rescue in Cases Not Otherwise Provided for

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever, in any case not provided for in section 224 or section 225 or in any other law for the time being in force, intentionally offers any resistance or illegal obstruction to the lawful apprehension of himself or of any other person, or escapes or attempts to escape from any custody in which he is lawfully detained, or rescues or attempts to rescue any other person from any custody in which that person is lawfully detained, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.]

Specific Relief Act 1963 Section 33

Title: Power to Require Benefit to Be Restored or Compensation to Be Made when Instrument is Cancelled or is Successfully Resisted as Being Void or Voidable

State: Central

Year: 1963

(1) On adjudging the cancellation of an instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted, to restore, so far as may be any benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make anycompensation to him which justice may require. (2) Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground-- (a) that the instrument sough to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if the defendant hasreceived any benefit under the instrument from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation for it; (b) that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his not having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the court may, if the defendant has received any benefit under the agreement from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, suchbenefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has benefited thereby.

Delhi Police Act, 1978 Complete Act

State: Delhi

Year: 1978

.....Act, 1955, or under section 12 of that Act in so far as it relates to satta gambling or on two or more occasions under any other provisions of that Act (including section 12 of that Act in so far as it does not relate to satta gambling); or (c) of any offence under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; or (d) of any offence under section 25, section 26, section 27, section 28 or section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959; or (e) of any offence under section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962; or (f) of any offence under section 61, section 63 or section 66, of the Punjab Excise Act, 1955, as in Delhi; or (g) on two or more occasions of an offence under (i) the Opium Act, 1878; or (ii) the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; or (iii) the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; or (iv) section 11 of the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, as in force in Delhi; or (h) on three or more occasions of an offence under section 105 or section 107 of this Act, the Commissioner of Police may, if he has reason to believe that such person is likely again to engage himself in the commission of any of the offences referred to in this section, by order in writing, direct such.....