Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: recklessnessMajor Port Trusts Act, 1963 Chapter XI
Title: Miscellaneous
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....the words "or produce a guarantee acceptable or produce a bank guarantee in respect of the amount as in the opinion of the High Court is satisfactory and the amount so deposited or guarantee so given" shall be substituted; (d) for sub-sections (5) and (6), the following sub-sections shall be substituted, namely:- "(5) Where the person referred to in sub-section (1) or his insurer establishes that he has paid is whole or in part any claims in respect of which he can limit his liability under this Part, the High Court shall place him in the same position and to the same extent in relation to the Fund as the claimant whose claim has been paid and allow to acquire by subrogation the rights which the 30 person so compensated would have enjoyed under this Part: Provided that the right of subrogation provided for in this sub-section may also be exercised by persons other than those therein mentioned in respect of any amount of compensation which they might, have paid to that extent if prescribed by the rules made in this behalf under this Part. (6) Where the person liable or any other person has established that he may at a later date be required to pay in whole or in.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMajor Port Trusts Act, 1963 Amending Act 1
Title: Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....the words "or produce a guarantee acceptable or produce a bank guarantee in respect of the amount as in the opinion of the High Court is satisfactory and the amount so deposited or guarantee so given" shall be substituted; (d) for sub-sections (5) and (6), the following sub-sections shall be substituted, namely:- "(5) Where the person referred to in sub-section (1) or his insurer establishes that he has paid is whole or in part any claims in respect of which he can limit his liability under this Part, the High Court shall place him in the same position and to the same extent in relation to the Fund as the claimant whose claim has been paid and allow to acquire by subrogation the rights which the 30 person so compensated would have enjoyed under this Part: Provided that the right of subrogation provided for in this sub-section may also be exercised by persons other than those therein mentioned in respect of any amount of compensation which they might, have paid to that extent if prescribed by the rules made in this behalf under this Part. (6) Where the person liable or any other person has established that he may at a later date be required to pay in whole or in.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping Act, 1958 Amending Act II
Title: Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002
State: Central
Year: 1958
.....the words "or produce a guarantee acceptable or produce a bank guarantee in respect of the amount as in the opinion of the High Court is satisfactory and the amount so deposited or guarantee so given" shall be substituted; (d) for sub-sections (5) and (6), the following sub-sections shall be substituted, namely:- "(5) Where the person referred to in sub-section (1) or his insurer establishes that he has paid is whole or in part any claims in respect of which he can limit his liability under this Part, the High Court shall place him in the same position and to the same extent in relation to the Fund as the claimant whose claim has been paid and allow to acquire by subrogation the rights which the 30 person so compensated would have enjoyed under this Part: Provided that the right of subrogation provided for in this sub-section may also be exercised by persons other than those therein mentioned in respect of any amount of compensation which they might, have paid to that extent if prescribed by the rules made in this behalf under this Part. (6) Where the person liable or any other person has established that he may at a later date be required to pay in whole or in.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002 Chapter 2
Title: Amendment of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958
State: Central
Year: 2002
.....the words "or produce a guarantee acceptable or produce a bank guarantee in respect of the amount as in the opinion of the High Court is satisfactory and the amount so deposited or guarantee so given" shall be substituted; (d) for sub-sections (5) and (6), the following sub-sections shall be substituted, namely:- "(5) Where the person referred to in sub-section (1) or his insurer establishes that he has paid is whole or in part any claims in respect of which he can limit his liability under this Part, the High Court shall place him in the same position and to the same extent in relation to the Fund as the claimant whose claim has been paid and allow to acquire by subrogation the rights which the 30 person so compensated would have enjoyed under this Part: Provided that the right of subrogation provided for in this sub-section may also be exercised by persons other than those therein mentioned in respect of any amount of compensation which they might, have paid to that extent if prescribed by the rules made in this behalf under this Part. (6) Where the person liable or any other person has established that he may at a later date be required to pay in whole or in.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping Act, 1958 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1958
.....in 1867, 1882andagain in 1893and 1896 but all these attempts failed owing to legal and constitutional difficulties.Two of the principal contributory factors were the then limited powers of the Indian Legislature to legislate regarding shipping and the fact that part of the British Statute law on the subject, including parts of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, which is the principal United-Kingdom enactment on the subject, applied to Indian and any Indian enactment had to be in legal harmony with that law. A fresh attempt was made in 1921-22 to codify the Indian law on merchant shipping by the Statute Law Revision Committee, which decided that only consolidation, and not revision should be attempted immediately. The result was the Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1923, which is now on the Statute Book and which consolidated some 21 existing Indian Acts on the subject. This Act has also been amended from time to time, the two major amendments being those made in 1933 and in 1953 so as to take power to implement the provisions of the international conventions with respect to load lines, 1930, and with respect to safety of life at sea, 1948, respectively, which have been ratified by.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMotor Vehicles Act, 1939 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1939
.....cab notwithstanding that the passengers may pay separate fares; 12 [* * * * * * *] 13[(4) "dealer" includes a person who 18 engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles or in building bodies for attachment to chassis;] Clause 2-Sub-clause (a).- At present a State Government may make rules under clause (k) of sub-section (2) of section 41 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939-to exempt, from the provisions of the Act relating to registration motor vehicles in the possession of dealers and specify the conditions subject to which such exemptions may be granted and the fees payable therefor. This sub-clause seeks to define the expression "dealer" so as to include a person who is engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles or in building bodies for attachment to chassis.-S.O.R. Gaz. of India. 17-8-78, Pt. II 8.2, Ext., p. 1120. (5) "driver" includes, where a separate person acts as steersman of a motor vehicle, that person as well as any other person engaged in the driving of the vehicle; 14[(5A) "driving licence" means the document issued by a competent authority under Chapter II authorising the person specified therein to drive a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any specified.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Indian Penal Code 1860 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1860
.....Court of Justice (including a liquidator, receiver or Commissioner) whose duty is, as such officer, to investigate or report on any matter of law or fact, or to make, authenticate, or keep any document, or to take charge or dispose of any property or to execute any judicial process, or to a administrator any oath, or to interpret, or to preserve order in the Court, and every person specially authorized by a Court of Justice to perform any of such duties; Fifth--Every juryman, assessor, or member of a Panchayat assisting a Court of Justice or public servant; Sixth--Every arbitrator or other person to whom any cause or matter has been referred for decision or report by any Court of Justice, or by any other competent public authority; Seventh--Every person who holds any office by virtue of which he is empowered to place or keep any person in confinement; Eighth--Every officer of the Government, whose duty it is, as such officer, to prevent offences, to give information of offences, to being offenders to justice, or to protect the public health, safety or convenience; Ninth--Every officer whose duty it is, as such officer, to take, receive, keep or expend any property on behalf of.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCarriage by Air Act, 1972 Schedule 2
Title: The Second Schedule
State: Central
Year: 1972
.....relating to the weight, dimensions and packing of the cargo, as well as those relating to the number of packages, are prima facie evidence of the facts stated; those relating to the quantity, volume and conditions of the cargo do not constitute evidence against the carrier except so far they both have been, and are stated in the air waybill to have been checked by him in the presence of the consignor, or relate to the apparent condition of the cargo. 12. (1) Subject to his liability to carry out all his obligations under the contract of carriage, the consignor has the right to dispose of the cargo by withdrawing it at the aerodrome of departure or destination, or by stopping it in the course of the journey on any landing, or by calling for it to be delivered at the place of destination or in the course of the journey to a person other than the consignee named in the air waybill, or by requiring it to be returned to the aerodrome of departure. He must not exercise this right of disposition in such a way as to prejudice the carrier or other consignors and he must repay any expenses occasioned by the exercise of this right. (2) If it is impossible to carry out the orders of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCarriage by Air Act, 1972 Schedule 3
Title: The Third Schedule
State: Central
Year: 1972
.....relating to the weight, dimensions and packing of the cargo, as well as those relating to the number of packages, are prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein; those relating to the quantity, volume and condition of the cargo do not constitute evidence against the carrier except so far as they both have been, and are stated in the air waybill or the cargo receipt to have been, checked by it in the presence of the consignor, or relate to the apparent condition of the cargo. 12. (1) Subject to its liability to carry out all its obligations under the contract of carriage, the consignor has the right to dispose of the cargo by withdrawing it at the airport of departure or destination, or by stopping it in the course of the journey on any landing, or by calling for it to be delivered at the place of destination or in the course of the journey to a person other than the consignee originally designated, or by requiring it to be returned to the airport of departure. The consignor shall not exercise this right of disposition in such a way as to prejudice the carrier or other consignors and shall reimburse any expenses occasioned by the exercise of this right. (2) If it is.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCarriage by Air (Amendment) Act 2009 Section 10
Title: Insertion of Third Schedule and Anexure
State: Central
Year: 2009
.....relating to the weight, dimensions and packing of the cargo, as well as those relating to the number of packages, are prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein; those relating to the quantity, volume and condition of the cargo do not constitute evidence against the carrier except so far as they both have been, and are stated in the air waybill or the cargo receipt to have been, checked by it in the presence of the consignor, or relate to the apparent condition of the cargo. 12. (1) Subject to its liability to carry out all its obligations under the contract of carriage, the consignor has the right to dispose of the cargo by withdrawing it at the airport of departure or destination, or by stopping it in the course of the journey on any landing, or by calling for it to be delivered at the place of destination or in the course of the journey to a person other than the consignee originally designated, or by requiring it to be returned to the airport of departure. The consignor shall not exercise this right of disposition in such a way as to prejudice the carrier or other consignors and shall reimburse any expenses occasioned by the exercise of this right. (2) If it is.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial