Bare Act Search Results

The Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 Complete Act

State: Kerala

Year: 1958

THE KERALA COMPENSATION FOR TENANTS IMPROVEMENTS ACT, 1958 THE KERALA COMPENSATION FOR TENANTS IMPROVEMENTS ACT, 1958 ACT 29 Of 1958 [1] An Act To Make Provisions For Payment Of Compensation For Improvements Made by thetenants in the state of kerala . Preamble.-WHEREAS it is necessary to make provisions for the payment of compensation for improvements made by tenants in the State of Kerala ; BE it enacted in the Ninth Year of the Republic of India as follows: 1. Short title, extent and commencement.-(1) This Act may be called the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958. (2) It extends to the whole of the State of Kerala (3) It shall come into force at once. 2. Definitions.-In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires. (a) "eviction" means the recovery of possession of land from a tenant; (b) "improvement" means any work or product of a work which adds to the value of the holding, is suitable to it and consistent with the purpose for which the holding is let, mortgaged or occupied, but does not include such clearances, embankments, leveling , enclosures, temporary wells and water-channels as are made by the tenant in the ordinary course of.....

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 88A

Title: Presumption as to Electronic Messages

State: Central

Year: 1872

1 [88A. Presumption as to electronic messages The Court may presume that an electronic message, forwarded by the originator through an electronic mail server to the addressee to whom the message purports to be addressed corresponds with the message as fed into his computer for transmission; but the Court shall not make any presumption as to the person by whom such message was sent. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, the expressions "addressee" and "originator" shall have the same meanings respectively assigned to them in clauses (b) and (za) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.] ________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 21 of 2000, section 92 and Schedule II (w.e.f. 17-10-2000).

Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 36A

Title: Presumption as to Documents in Certain Cases

State: Central

Year: 1944

1[36A. Presumption as to documents in certain cases Where any document is produced by any person or has been seized from the custody or control of any person, in either case, under this Act or under any other law and such document is tendered by the prosecution in evidence against him or against him and any other person who is tried jointly with him, the Court shall, -- ( a) unless the contrary is proved by such person, presume -- ( i) the truth of the contents of such documents; ( ii) that the signature and every other part of such document which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person or which the Court may reasonably assume to have been signed by, or to be in the handwriting of, any particular person, is in that person's handwriting, and in the case of a document executed or attested, that it was executed or attested by the person by whom it purports to have been so executed or attested; ( b) admit the document in evidence, notwithstanding that it is not duly stamped; if such document is otherwise admissible in evidence.] ________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 36 of 1973, section 23 (w.e.f. 1-9-1973).

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 113A

Title: Presumption as to Abetment of Suicide by a Married Woman

State: Central

Year: 1872

1 [113A. Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman When thequestion is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted byher husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she hadcommitted suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriageand that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her tocruelty, the Court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances ofthe case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relativeof her husband. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,"cruelty" shall have the same meaning asin section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)]. _______________________ 1. Inserted by Act 46 of 1983, section 7.

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 113B

Title: Presumption as to Dowry Death

State: Central

Year: 1872

1 [113B. Presumption as to dowry death When the question is whether a person has committed the dowry death of a woman and it is shown that soon before her death such woman has been subjected by such person to cruelty or harassment for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, the Court shall presume that such person had caused the dowry death. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section "dowry death" shall have the same meaning as in section 304B, of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)]. _______________________ 1. Inserted by Act 43 of 1986, section 12 (w.e.f. 5-1-1986).

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 114A

Title: Presumption as to Absence of Consent in Certain Prosecutions for Rape

State: Central

Year: 1872

1 [114A. Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecutions for rape In a prosecution for, rape under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) or clause (e) or clause (g) of sub-section (2) of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860), where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the woman alleged to have been raped and she states in her evidence before the Court that she did not consent, the Court shall presume that she did not consent.] _______________________ 1. Inserted by Act 43 of 1983, section 6.

Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 Section 24

Title: Presumption in the Case of Conduct of Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques

State: Central

Year: 1994

1 [24. Presumption in the case of conduct of pre-nataldiagnostic techniques.-- Notwithstanding anything contained in the IndianEvidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872),the court shall presume unless thecontrary is proved that the pregnant woman was compelled by her husband or any other relative, as the case may be, to undergo pre-nataldiagnostic technique for the purposes otherthan those specified in subsection(2) of section 4 and suchperson shall be liable forabetment of offence under sub-section(3) of section 23 and shall be punishable for the offence specified under thatsection.] _______________________ 1.Substituted by Act 14 of 2003,sec. 20, for section 24 (see Annexe).

Central Excise Act, 1944 Chapter 6B

Title: Presumption as to Documents

State: Central

Year: 1944

1[Chapter VIB Presumption as to Documents] ________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 44 of 1980, section 50 and Schedule V (w.e.f. 11-10-1982).

Anti Hijacking Act 1982 Section 10A

Title: Presumptions as to Offences Under Sections 4 and 5

State: Central

Year: 1982

1[" 10A . Presumptions as to offences under sections 4 and 5-- In a prosecution for an offence under section 4 or section 5 if it is proved:-- (a) that the arms, ammunition or explosives were recovered from the possession of the accused and there is reason to believe that such arms, ammunition or explosives of similar nature were used in the commission of such offence; or (b) that there is evidence of sue of force, threat of force or any other form o intimidation caused to the crew or passengers in connection with the commission of such offence, the Designated Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the accused had committed such offence. "] ____________________________ 1. Inserted by the Anti Hijacking (Amendment) Act, 1994

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 90A

Title: Presumption as to Electronic Records Five Years Old

State: Central

Year: 1872

1[90A. Presumption as to electronic records five years old Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the 2[Electronic signature] which purports to be the digital signature of any particular person was so affixed by him or any person authorised by him in this behalf. Explanation.-Electronic records are said to be in proper custody if they are in the place in which, and under the care of the person with whom, they naturally be; but no custody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin, or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to render such an origin probable. This Explanation applies also to section 81A.] ________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 21 of 2000, section 92 and Schedule II (w.e.f. 17-10-2000). 2. Substituted vide IT Amendment Act, 2008 prior text was "digital signature"