Bare Act Search Results

Bombay Building (Control on Erection, Re-erection and Conversion) (Repeal) Act, 1971, (Maharashtra) Preamble

Title: the Bombay Building (Control on Erection, Re

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1971

THE BOMBAY BUILDING (CONTROL ON ERECTION, RE-ERECTION AND CONVERSION) (REPEAL) ACT 1971 [Act No. XLI of 1971]1 [08th November, 1971] PREAMBLE An Act to repeal the Bombay Building (Control on Erection, Re-erection and Conversion) Act, 1948. WHEREAS, it is expedient to repeal the Bombay Building (Control on Erection, Re-erection and Conversion) Act, 1948; it is hereby enacted in the Twenty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows :- INTRODUCTION In 1948, the Bombay Building (Control on Erection, Re-erection and Conversion) Act. 1948 was enacted. At that time, there was an acute shortage of having accommodation for industrial towns and cities in the State therefore, to regulate the supply of building materials (e.g. bricks, iron and steel, cement etc.) and rationing the supply to the needy, such Act to control the construction of buildings was enacted. During that shortage period, non-essential construction work was not allowed without permission. But when such situation was eased, the old Act, is now repealed. ______________ 1. For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Maharashtra Government Gazette. 1971, Part V, Extra, p. 197.

Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Trnsactions in Securities) Act, 1992 Preamble 1

Title: Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions Insecurities) Act, 1992

State: Central

Year: 1992

THE SPECIAL COURT (TRIAL OF OFFENCES RELATING TO TRANSACTIONS INSECURITIES) ACT, 1992 [Act, No. 27 of 1992] [18th August, 1992.] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for the establishment of a Special Court for the trial of offences relating to transactions in securities for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Forty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:--

Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Trnsactions in Securities) Act, 1992 Complete Act

Title: Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Trnsactions in Securities) Act, 1992

State: Central

Year: 1992

Preamble1 - SPECIAL COURT (TRIAL OF OFFENCES RELATING TO TRANSACTIONS INSECURITIES) ACT, 1992 Section1 - Short title and commencement Section2 - Definitions Section3 - Appointment and functions of Custodian Section4 - Contracts entered into fraudulently may be cancelled Section5 - Establishment of Special Court Section5A - Distribution of cases amongst Judges of Special Court Section6 - Cognizance of case by Special Court Section7 - Jurisdiction of Special Court Section8 - Jurisdiction of Special Court as to joint trials Section9 - Procedure and powers of Special Court Section9A - Jurisdiction, powers, authority and procedure of Special Court in civil matters Section9B - Powers of the Special Court in arbitration matters Section10 - Appeal Section11 - Discharge of liabilities Section11A - Power to punish for contempt Section12 - Protection of action taken in good faith Section13 - Act to have overriding effect Section14 - Power to make rules Section15 - Repeal and savings

Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Trnsactions in Securities) Act, 1992 Section 8

Title: Jurisdiction of Special Court as to Joint Trials

State: Central

Year: 1992

The Special Court shall have jurisdiction to try and person concerned in the offence referred to in sub-section (2) of section 3 either as a principal, conspiration or abettor and all other offences and accused persons as can be jointly tried therewith at one trial in accordance with the Code.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1898

.....as such Magistrate, exercised the powers of an Assistant Sessions Judge, he may be invested with the powers under this section notwithstanding the fact that he has not exercised the powers of Magistrate of the first class for not less than ten years." Act 19 of 1969, Section 3 and Schedule, Item 14 (in Delhi on 2-10-1969). WEST BENGAL In its application to the State of West Bengal, for Section 30, substitute the following, namely: "30. Offences punishment with imprisonment not exceeding seven years.-Notwithstanding any thing contained in Section 28 or Section 29, the State Government may, in consultation with the High Court, invest any Judicial Magistrate of the first class with power to try as a Magistrate all offences not punishable with death or with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years : Provided that no Judicial Magistrate of the first class has, prior to his appointment as such powers unless he has, for not less than ten years, exercised powers not inferior to those of a Judicial Magistrate of the first class : Provided further that if any Judicial Magistrate of the first class has, prior to his appointment as such Magistrate,.....

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....under the Government; (d) every officer of a Court of Justice whose duty it is, as such officer, to investigate or report on any matter of law or fact, or to make, authenticate or keep any document, or to take charge or dispose of any property, or to execute any judicial process, or to administer any oath, or to interpret, or to preserve order in the Court, and every person especially authorized by a Court of Justice to perform any of such duties; (e) every person who holds any office by virtue of which he is empowered to place or keep any person in confinement; (f) every officer of the Government whose duty it is, as such officer, to prevent offences, to give information of offences, to bring offenders to justice, or to protect the public health, safety or convenience; (g) every officer whose duty it is, as such officer, to take, receive, keep or expend any property on behalf of the Government, or to make any survey, assessment or contract on behalf of the Government, or to execute any revenue process, or to investigate, or to report on, any matter affecting the pecuniary interests of the Government, or to make, authenticate or keep any document relating to the pecuniary.....

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Chapter 24

Title: General Provisions as to Inquiries and Trials

State: Central

Year: 1973

.....theft as a servant and acquitted. He cannot afterwards, while the acquittal remains in force, be charged with theft as a servant, or upon the same facts, with theft simply, or with criminal breach of trust. (b) A is tried for causing grievous hurt and convicted. The person injured afterwards dies. A may be tried again for culpable homicide. (c) A is charged before the Court of Session and convicted of the culpable homicide of B. A may not afterwards be tried on the same facts for the murder of B. (d) A is charged by a Magistrate of the first class with, and convicted by him of voluntarily causing hurt to B. A may not afterwards be tried for voluntarily causing grievous hurt (o B on the same facts, unless the case comes within sub-section (3) of this section. (e) A is charged by a Magistrate of the second class with, and convicted by him of, theft of property from the person of B. A may subsequently be charged with, and tried for, robbery on the same facts. (f) A, B and C are charged by a magistrate of the first class with, and convicted by him of, robbing D. A, B and C may afterwards be charged with, and tried for, dacoity on the same facts. Section 301 -.....

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 16 to 29

Title: Procedure of Hearing

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....appealed from Where the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has omitted to frame or try any issue, or to determine any question of fact, which appears to the Appellate Court essential to the right decision of the suit upon the merits, the Appellate Court may, if necessary, frame issues, and refer the same for trial to the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred, and in such case shall direct such Court to take the additional evidence required ; and such Court shall proceed to try such issues, and shall return the evidence to the Appellate Court together with its findings thereon and the reasons therefor 1d[within such time as may be fixed by the Appellate Court or extended by it from time to time]. 26. Findings and evidence to be put on record--Objections to finding (1) Such evidence and findings shall form part of the record in the suit; and either party may, within a time to be fixed by the Appellate Court, present a memorandum of objections to any finding. (2) Determination of appeal.--After the expiration of the period so fixed for presenting such memorandum the Appellate Court shall proceed to determine the appeal. 1e[26A. Order of.....

The Legal Practitioners Fees Rules, 1973 Complete Act

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1973

.....and includes an Advocate, Vakil, Attorney or Pleader authorised by any law for the time being in force to practice before Civil Courts. (2) The fact of a promissory note or other agreement to pay the fee having been given or made by the client does not entitle the legal practitioner to certify that he has received the fee. CASE LAW (1) Change of Counsel" Previous Counsel cannot insist upon fees till conclusion of proceedings. Work, however, completed by previous Counsel till settlement of issues and leading evidence on behalf of party partly " Trial of suits thus, partly concluded. One-fourth of scheduled fees under the Tamil Nadu Legal Practitioners' Fees Rules directed to be paid by party. Counsel directed to give unconditional consent to engage another advocate. [C.S. Venkata Subramanian versus State Bank of India (AIR 1997 SC 2329)]. (2) Pleaders fees should be commensurate with the volume and quantum of expertise put in the respective cases by the Legal Practitioners. Legal Practitioners work is more onerous in the case of mortgage suit based on negotiable instruments and loan. Suit based on a mortgage should necessarily fall under Rule 3 (2) (b) of the Legal.....

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Chapter 19

Title: Trial of Warrant-cases by Magistrates

State: Central

Year: 1973

.....that it shall not be in the interest of justice to discharge the accused." _______________________ 1. Vide West Bengal Act 24 of 1988 section 5. Section 246 - Procedure where accused is not discharged (1) If, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence triable under this Chapter, which such Magistrate is competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by him, he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused. (2) The charge shall then be read and explained to the accused, and he shall be asked whether he pleads guilty or has any defence to make. (3) If the accused pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall record the plea, and may, in his discretion, convict him thereon. (4) If the accused refuses to plead, or does not plead or claims to be tried or if the accused is not convicted under sub-section (3) he shall be required to stale, at the commencement of the next hearing of the case or, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith whether he wishes to.....