Bare Act Search Results

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 2000 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2000

.....Tribunal who is authorised by the Presiding Officer to function as Registrar;'. (i) "registry" means the registry of the Appellate Tribunal; (j) "rules" means the rules made under the Act; (k) "recognised stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (f) of Sec. 2 of the Act; (l) "stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (J') of Sec. 2 of the Act; (2) words and expressions used and not defined in these rules but defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act. RULE 03: LIMITATION FOR FILING APPEAL (1)Where a recognised stock exchange acting in pursuance of any power given to it by its bye-laws, refuses to list the securities of any company, the company shall be entitled to be furnished with reasons for such refusal and may,- (a) within 15 days from the date on which the reasons for such refusal are furnished to it, or (b) where the stock exchange had omitted or failed to dispose of, within the time specified in sub-sec. (1-A) of Sec. 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter in this rule referred to as the "specified time"), the application for permission for.....

Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench & Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court. Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication [deleted by Mah. Act No. 27 of 2008, and with the previous......State Government. w.e.f. 1.7.1987] [* * *] prescribed that such of that application referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. 3. Abolition of appeal from judgment or order of single Judge of High Court made in exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction.:- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the.....

Tamil Nadu Village Servant Classification Control and Appeal Rules, 1983 Complete Act

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1983

.....is satisfied that the delay is due to just and sufficient cause. (2) The Revenue Divisional Officer may, pending exercise of his powers under sub-rule (1), stay the execution of any order which is the subject matter of appeal. 7. Revision.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, of his own motion, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Tahsildar and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order, or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed or remit for re-consideration such order on any of the grounds specified in subrule (3). (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the collector may of his own motion, or on the application of the person aggrieved, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Revenue Division Officer and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed, or remit for reconsideration such order on any of the grounds specified in sub-rule(3). (3) The grounds.....

The Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Chattisgarh

Year: 2006

.....if the petitioner satisfies the Division Bench that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such period. Explanation.--The fact that the petitioner was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may by sufficient cause within the meaning of this sub-section. (3) An appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed, heard and decided in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed by the High Court. Section 3 - Power to make rules (1) The High Court may, from time to time, make rules for carrying out all or any of the purpose of the Act. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for the procedure of filing, hearing and disposal of appeal under sub-section (3) of section 2. Section 4 - Repeal and Saving (1) The Chhattisgarh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Letter Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 (No. 29 of 1981) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under or in pursuance of the said Act and which has attained finality shall not be reopened in any court of law. .....

Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court: Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication and with the previous approval of the State Government prescribe that such of the applications referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a Single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. SECTION 03: ABOLITION OF APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT MADE IN EXERCISE OF ORIGINAL OR APPELLATE JURISDICTION (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the 28th December 1865 and in any other instrument.....

Company Law Board (Fees on Applications and Petitions) Rules, 1991 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1991

.....means the Schedule to these rules; (i) "Security" means security as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 22A of the Securities Contracts Act; (j) "Securities Contracts Act" means the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956). 3. Fees on application or petition.- (1) Every petition made to the Company Law Board shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee specified in the Schedule to these Rules: Provided that no fee shall be payable on applications or petitions made by the Regional Director, Registrar of Companies, or by the Central Government, or by any officer on behalf of the Government or by the Government of a State. (2) Every interlocutory application made to the Company Law Board for an interim order or direction shall be accompanied by a fee of rupees fifty. 4. The fees payable under these rules shall be paid by means of.- A bank draft drawn in favour of Pay and Accounts Officer, Department of Company Affairs, New Delhi/Bombay/Calcutta/Madras. 5. The fees received by the Pay and Accounts Officer under these rules shall be credited to.- The Public Account of India under the Head of Account 1475 - Other General Economic.....

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Chapter VI

Title: Appeal and Revision

State: Karnataka

Year: 1957

.....Act 4 of 1999 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. 3. Inserted by Act 18 of 1994 w.e.f. 1.4.1994. 4. Inserted by Act 7 of 1997 w.e.f. 1.4.1997. 5. Substituted by Act 9 of 1970 w.e.f. 1.4.1970. 6. Omitted by Act 16 of 1989 w.e.f. 1.4.1989. 7. Inserted by Act 16 of 1989 w.e.f. 1.4.1989. 8. Substituted by Act 15 of 1970 w.e.f. 1.4.1964. 9. Substituted by Act 18 of 1978 w.e.f. 1.9.1978. Section 20 - Appeals 1 [20. Appeals 2 [(1) Any person objecting to an order affecting him passed under the provisions of this Act by any officer not above the rank of a Deputy Commissioner may appeal to the Joint Commissioner:] 3 [Provided that no such appeal shall lie against an order in respect of which an application under section 12-D has been made.] (2) The appeal shall be preferred within thirty days,-- (i) in respect of an order of assessment, from the date on which the notice of assessment was served on the appellant, and (ii) in respect of any other order, from the date on which the order was communicated to the appellant: Provided that the appellate authority may admit an appeal preferred after the period of thirty days aforesaid, 4 [but within a further period of one hundred and.....

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix G

Title: Appeal, Reference and Review

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....on the .................... day of .................... 19 ............ the .................... files this memorandum of cross objection under rule 22 of Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and sets forth the following grounds of objection to the decree appealed from, namely:- ...................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................... No.9 DECREE IN APPEAL (O. XLI, r. 35) (Title) Appeal No. .................... of 19 ............ from the decree of the Court of .................... dated the .................... day of .................... 19.... Memorandum of Appeal .............................................................................................................Plaintiff. .............................................................................................................Defendant. The ....................above-named appeals to the ............................. Court at .................... from the decree of............................ in the.....

Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 Chapter V

Title: Appeal and Revision

State: Karnataka

Year: 1979

.....other person objecting to an order passed by the appellate authority 1 [under section 13 or an order passed by a revisional authority under 2 [sub-section (3)] of section 15] may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal within a period of sixty days from the date on which the order was communicated to him. (2) The Appellate Tribunal may admit an appeal preferred after the period of sixty days referred to in sub-section (1) 3 [but within a further period of one hundred and eighty days] if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within that period. 4 [(2A) The officer authorised under sub-section (1) or the person against whom an appeal has been preferred, as the case may be, on receipt of notice that an appeal against the order of the 5 [Deputy Commissioner] or the 5 [Joint Commissioner] has been preferred under sub-section (1) by the other party, may, notwithstanding that he has not appealed against such order or any part thereof, file 6 [at any time before the appeal is finally heard] a memorandum of cross objections, verified in the prescribed manner against any part of the order of the 5 [Deputy Commissioner] or the 5 [Joint.....

Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 Section 14

Title: Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal

State: Karnataka

Year: 1979

.....its discretion, give such directions as it thinks fit, in regard to the payment of tax, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to its satisfaction in such form and manner as may be prescribed. (7) (a) The Appellate Tribunal may, on the application either of the appellant or of the respondent, review any order passed by it under subsection (5) on the basis of facts which were not before it when it passed the order : Provided that no such application shall be preferred more than once in respect of the same order. (b) The application for review shall be preferred in the prescribed manner within six months from the date on which the order to which application relates was communicated to the applicant ; and where the application is preferred by any person other than an officer empowered by the State Government under sub-section (1), it shall be accompained by a fee equal to that which had been paid in respect of the appeal : Provided that if the application for review is preferred within ninety days from the date on which the order to which application relates is communicated to the applicant, the application shall be accompained by half the fee which had been paid.....