Bare Act Search Results

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 2000 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2000

.....Tribunal who is authorised by the Presiding Officer to function as Registrar;'. (i) "registry" means the registry of the Appellate Tribunal; (j) "rules" means the rules made under the Act; (k) "recognised stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (f) of Sec. 2 of the Act; (l) "stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (J') of Sec. 2 of the Act; (2) words and expressions used and not defined in these rules but defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act. RULE 03: LIMITATION FOR FILING APPEAL (1)Where a recognised stock exchange acting in pursuance of any power given to it by its bye-laws, refuses to list the securities of any company, the company shall be entitled to be furnished with reasons for such refusal and may,- (a) within 15 days from the date on which the reasons for such refusal are furnished to it, or (b) where the stock exchange had omitted or failed to dispose of, within the time specified in sub-sec. (1-A) of Sec. 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter in this rule referred to as the "specified time"), the application for permission for.....

Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench & Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court. Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication [deleted by Mah. Act No. 27 of 2008, and with the previous......State Government. w.e.f. 1.7.1987] [* * *] prescribed that such of that application referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. 3. Abolition of appeal from judgment or order of single Judge of High Court made in exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction.:- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the.....

Tamil Nadu Village Servant Classification Control and Appeal Rules, 1983 Complete Act

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1983

.....is satisfied that the delay is due to just and sufficient cause. (2) The Revenue Divisional Officer may, pending exercise of his powers under sub-rule (1), stay the execution of any order which is the subject matter of appeal. 7. Revision.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, of his own motion, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Tahsildar and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order, or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed or remit for re-consideration such order on any of the grounds specified in subrule (3). (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the collector may of his own motion, or on the application of the person aggrieved, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Revenue Division Officer and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed, or remit for reconsideration such order on any of the grounds specified in sub-rule(3). (3) The grounds.....

The Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Chattisgarh

Year: 2006

.....if the petitioner satisfies the Division Bench that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such period. Explanation.--The fact that the petitioner was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may by sufficient cause within the meaning of this sub-section. (3) An appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed, heard and decided in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed by the High Court. Section 3 - Power to make rules (1) The High Court may, from time to time, make rules for carrying out all or any of the purpose of the Act. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for the procedure of filing, hearing and disposal of appeal under sub-section (3) of section 2. Section 4 - Repeal and Saving (1) The Chhattisgarh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Letter Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 (No. 29 of 1981) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under or in pursuance of the said Act and which has attained finality shall not be reopened in any court of law. .....

Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court: Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication and with the previous approval of the State Government prescribe that such of the applications referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a Single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. SECTION 03: ABOLITION OF APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT MADE IN EXERCISE OF ORIGINAL OR APPELLATE JURISDICTION (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the 28th December 1865 and in any other instrument.....

Company Law Board (Fees on Applications and Petitions) Rules, 1991 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1991

.....means the Schedule to these rules; (i) "Security" means security as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 22A of the Securities Contracts Act; (j) "Securities Contracts Act" means the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956). 3. Fees on application or petition.- (1) Every petition made to the Company Law Board shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee specified in the Schedule to these Rules: Provided that no fee shall be payable on applications or petitions made by the Regional Director, Registrar of Companies, or by the Central Government, or by any officer on behalf of the Government or by the Government of a State. (2) Every interlocutory application made to the Company Law Board for an interim order or direction shall be accompanied by a fee of rupees fifty. 4. The fees payable under these rules shall be paid by means of.- A bank draft drawn in favour of Pay and Accounts Officer, Department of Company Affairs, New Delhi/Bombay/Calcutta/Madras. 5. The fees received by the Pay and Accounts Officer under these rules shall be credited to.- The Public Account of India under the Head of Account 1475 - Other General Economic.....

Calcutta Pilots Act, 1859 Section 10

Title: Trial How to Proceed Lf Any Jurors Does Not Attend

State: Central

Year: 1859

It for any cause any of the persons summoned to attend as jurors shall not be in attendance at the time fixed for the commencement of the trial, the trial may with the consent of the prosecutor and the party accused be held before the Judge and such jurors as shall be in attendance. If such consent be not given, the place of the absent juror shall be supplied by some other person selected by the Judge from the same profession or calling as the person originally summoned and who shall consent to serve, provided no objection to such person be made and allowed in manner aforesaid. If the parties or either of them do not consent that the trial shall be held before the Judge and such jurors as may be in attendance and the place of the absent juror cannot be supplied by a person consenting to serve, the trial shall be postponed to another day and the Judge shall either re-summon the same jury or appoint and summon another jury in the manner hereinbefore provided.

Calcutta Pilots Act, 1859 Section 16

Title: Verdict of Jurors

State: Central

Year: 1859

Upon the completion of the trial the jurors shall give their verdict upon the charge, or, if there be more than one, upon each separate charge. The verdict shall be according to the opinion of the majority of jurors. If the jurors are equally divided, the Judge shall declare his opinion, and the verdict shall be according to the opinion of the Judge and the jurors with whom he concurs.

Calcutta Pilots Act, 1859 Section 11

Title: Register of Jurors Who Have Served

State: Central

Year: 1859

The Judge shall register in a book the names of all jurors' mentioned in either of the said two lists who have attended and served on a trial held under this Act. A juror who has served shall not be required again to serve and his name shall be excluded in reading over the jury lists until all the persons named in the said lists who are present in Calcutta and capable of attending as jurors shall have served.

Coroners Act, 1871 Section 34

Title: Jurors Not to Be Summoned Twice Within the Year

State: Central

Year: 1871

Unless in case of necessity, no person who has appeared, or has been summoned to appear, as a juror on an inquest, and has not made default shall, within one year after such appearance or summons, be summoned to appear as a juror under this Act.