Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: owner s equitySign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialRAILWAYS ACT, 1989 Section 97
Title: Goods carried at owner's risk rate
State: Central
Year: 1989
Notwithstanding anything contained in section 93, a railway administration shall not be responsible for any loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery in transit, of any consignment carried at owner's risk rate, from whatever cause arising, except upon proof, that such loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery was due to negligence or misconduct on its part or on the part of any of its servants: Provided that-- (a) where the whole of such consignment or the whole of any package forming part of such consignment is not delivered to the consignee or the endorsee and such non-delivery is not proved by the railway administration to have been due to fire or to any accident to the train; or (b) where in respect of any such consignment or of any package forming part of such consignment which had been so covered or protected that the covering or protection was not readily removable by hand, it is pointed out to the railway administration on or before delivery that any part of that consignment or package had been pilfered in transit, the railway administration shall be bound to disclose to the consignor, the consignee or the endorsee how the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionEMPLOYEE'S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 Chapter 2
Title: EMPLOYEES'S COMPENSATION
State: Central
Year: 1923
.....(2)" (w.e.f. 1-6-1959). 13. The words "solely and" omitted by Act 15 of 1933, sec. 3. 14. Substituted by the Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 [Act No. 45 of 2009] to be effective from 23rd December, 2009 previous text was:- "workman" 15. Substituted by the Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 [Act No. 45 of 2009] to be effective from 23rd December, 2009 previous text was:- "Workmen" Section 4 - Amount of compensation 1[(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the amount of compensation shall be as follows, namely:-- (a) where death results an from the injury amount equal to 2[fifty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the deceased 14[employee] multiplied by the relevant factor; or an amount of 9[one lakh and twenty thousand rupees], whichever is more; (b) where permanent total disablement results from the injury an amount equal to 4[sixty per cent.] of the monthly wages of the injured 14[employee] multiplied by the relevant factor; or an amount of 10[one lakh and forty thousand rupees], whichever is more; .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionHire-purchase Act, 1972 [Repealed] Chapter V
Title: Rights and Obligations of the Owner
State: Central
Year: 1972
.....of the arrears of hire due shall be subject to the provisions of section 17; (b) subject to the conditions specified in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (2) of section 10, to forfeit the initial deposit, if so provided in the agreement; (c) subject to the provisions of section 17 and section 20 and subject to any contract to the contrary, to enter he premises of the hirer and seize the goods; (d) subject to the provisions of section 21 and section 22, to recover possession of the goods by application under section 20 or by suit; (e) without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 14 and of section 15, to damages for non-delivery of the goods, from the date on which termination is effective, to the date on which the goods are delivered to or seized by the owner. Section 20 - Restriction on owner's right to recover possession of goods otherwise than through court (1) Where goods have been let under a hire-purchase agreement and the statutory proportion of the hire-purchase price has been paid, whether in pursuance of the judgment of a court or otherwise, or tendered by or on behalf of the hirer or any surely, the owner shall not enforce any right to.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionFactories Act, 1948 Section 93
Title: Liability of Owner of Premises in Certain Circumstances
State: Central
Year: 1948
.....sub-section (1). (3) Where is any premises, independent or self-contained, floors or flats are leased to different occupiers for use as separate factories, the owner of the premises shall be liable as if he were the occupier or manager of a factory, for any contravention of the provisions of this Act in respect of-- (i) latrines, urinals and washing facilities in so far as the maintenance of the common supply of water for these purposes is concerned; (ii) fencing of machinery and plant belonging to the owner and not specifically entrusted to the custody or user of an occupier; (iii) safe means of access to the floors or flats and maintenance and cleanliness of staircases and common passages; (iv) precautions in case of fire; (v) maintenance of hoists and lifts; and (vi) maintenance of any other common facilities provided in the premises. (4) The Chief Inspector shall have, subject to the control of the State Government, power to issue orders to the owner of the premises in respect of the carrying out the provisions of sub-section (3). (5) The provisions of sub-section (3) relating to the liability of the owner shall apply where in any premises independent.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNorthern India Canal and Drainage Act, I873 Section 40
Title: When Occupier is to Pay Both Owners Rate and Occupiers Rate
State: Central
Year: 1873
If such land is occupied by the owner, or if it is occupied by a tenant whose rent is not liable to enhancement on the ground that the value of the produce of the land or the productive-powers of the land has or have been increased by irrigation, such owner or tenant shall pay the owner's rate as well as the occupier's rate. {Sections.40 to 43 have been rep.in the Punjab by the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 (16 of 1887)section3 and Sch,}
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1976 Section 115
Title: Owner's obligation to give notice of construction or re-construction or demolition of building
State: Karnataka
Year: 1976
(1) (a) If any building in the city is constructed or re-constructed, the owner shall give notice thereof to the Commissioner, within fifteen days from the date of completion or occupation of the building whichever is earlier. (b) If such date falls within the last two months of a half-year, the owner shall, subject to notice being given under clause (a), be entitled to a remission of the whole of the tax of enhanced tax, as the case may be, payable in respect of the building only, for that half-year. (c) If such date falls within the first four months of a half-year, the owner shall, subject to notice being given under clause (a), be entitled to a remission of so much, not exceeding a half of the tax or enhanced tax, as the case may be, payable in respect of the building only, for that half-year as is proportionate to the number of days in that half-year preceding such date. (2) (a) If any building in the city is demolished or destroyed, the owner shall, until notice thereof is given to the Commissioner, be liable for the payment of the property tax for which he would have been liable had the building not been demolished or destroyed. (b) If such notice is given within t
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNorthern India Canal and Drainage Act, I873 Section 37
Title: Owners Rate
State: Central
Year: 1873
In addition to the occupier's rate, a rate to be called the " owner's rate" may be imposed, according to rules to be made by the State Government, on the owners of canal-irrigated lands, in respect of the benefit which they derive from such irrigation.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionHIRE-PURCHASE ACT, 1972 [REPEALED] Section 20
Title: Restriction on owner's right to recover possession of goods otherwise than through court
State: Central
Year: 1972
.....(1), the hire-purchase agreement, if not previously terminated, shall terminate, and-- (a) the hirer shall be released from all liability under the agreement and shall be entitled to recover from the owner all sums paid by the hirer under the agreement or under any security given by him in respect thereof; and (b) the surety shall be entitled to recover from the owner all sums paid by him under the contract of guarantee or under any security given by him in respect thereof. (3) Where, by virtue of the provisions of sub-section (1), the owner is precluded from enforcing a right to recover possession of the goods, he may make an application for recovery of possession of the goods to any court having jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the same relief, (4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in any case in which the hirer has terminated the agreement by virtue of any right vested in him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMAJOR PORT TRUSTS ACT, 1963 Section 60
Title: Ship-owner's lien for freight and other charges
State: Central
Year: 1963
(1) If the master or owner of any vessel or his agent, at or before the time of landing from such vessel any goods at any dock, wharf, quay, stage, jetty, berth, mooring or pier belonging to or in the occupation of a Board, gives to the Board a notice in writing that such goods are to remain subject to a lien for freight or other charges payable to the ship-owner, to an amount to be mentioned in such notice, such goods shall continue to be liable to such lien to such amount. (2) The goods shall be retained in the custody of the Board at the risk and expense of the owners of the goods until such lien is discharged as hereinafter mentioned; and godown or storage rent shall be payable by the party entitled to such goods for the time during which they may be so retained. (3) Upon the production before any officer appointed by the Board in that behalf of a document purporting to be a receipt for, or release from, the amount of such lien, executed by the person by whom or on whose behalf such notice has been given, the Board may permit such goods to be removed without regard to such lien, provided that the Board shall have used reasonable care in respect to the authenticity of such
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDelhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Repealed] Section 28
Title: Recovery of Possession by Manager of a Hotel or the Owner of a Lodging House
State: Central
Year: 1952
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, a manager of a hotel or owner of a lodging house shall be entitled to recover possession of the accommodation provided by him on obtaining a certificate from the Controller certifying- (a) that the lodger has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance or which causes annoyance to any adjoining or neighbouring lodger; (b) that the accommodation is reasonably and bona fide required by the owner of the hotel or lodging house, as the case may be, either for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held, or any other cause which may be deemed satisfactory by the Controller; (c) that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of the period of the agreement in respect thereof; (d) that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adversely or substantially the owner's interest therein; (e) that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial