Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: oral surgerySign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialDentists Act, 1948 Schedule I
Title: Schedule
State: Central
Year: 1948
.....7-9-1988. 36[37. Magadh University Bachelor of Dental Surgery B.D.S Magadh] PART II [See sub-section (3) of section 10] Recognised Dental Qualifications for the purposes of Registration when the Register is first prepared Authority or Institution Recognised dental qualification Abbreviation for registration 1 2 3 1. The University of Vienna (Austria) Post-graduate Certificate of Dentistry Z.D.S (Vienna) 2 The Tulane University of Louisiana (U.S.A.) Doctor of Dental Surgery D.D.S (Louisiana) (U.S.A.) 3 Dusseldorf (Germany) Zahnarzt Diploma PART III [See sub-section (4) of section 10] Recognised Dental Qualifications granted by Authorities or Institutions outside India only when granted to a citizen of India Authority or Institution Recognised dental qualification Abbreviation for registration 1 2 3 1. The University of Punjab-Lahore Bachelor of Dental Surgery Master of Dental.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionControl of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 14
Title: Authorization of Interception of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communication
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....investigating or law enforcement officer making the application and the head of the department authorizing the application; (b) A statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant, to justify his belief that an order should be issued including- (i) Details as to the offence of organized crime that has been, is being or is about to be committed; (ii) A particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; (iii) A particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; and (iv) The identity of the person, if known, committing the offence of organized crime and whose communications is to be intercepted; (c) A statement as to whether or not other modes of enquiry or intelligence gathering have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous or is likely to expose the identity of those connected with the operation of interception; (d) A statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained, if the nature of the enquiry is such that the authorization.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Chapter 6
Title: Of the Exclusion of Oral or Documentary Evidence
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....is drawn in a set of three, one only need be proved. (d) A contracts, in writing, with B for the delivery of indigo upon certain terms. The contract mentions the fact that B had paid A the price of other indigo contracted for verbally on another occasion. Oral evidence is offered that no payment was made for the other indigo. The evidence is admissible. (e) A gives B receipt for money paid by B. Oral evidence is offered of the payment. The evidence is admissible. _________________________ 1. Where, however, a criminal court finds that a confession or other statements or an accused person has not been recorded in the manner prescribed, evidence may be taken that the recorded statement was duly made see the Code or Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974), section, 463. 2. Substituted by Act 18 of 1872, section 7, for "under the Indian Succession Act". 3. Substituted by Act 3 of 1951, section 3 and Schedule, for "the States". Section 92 - Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement When the terms of any such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or any matter required by law to be reduced to the form of a document have been proved according to the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPrevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 [Repealed] Section 47
Title: Interception and Disclosure of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communications Prohibited
State: Central
Year: 2002
.....communication in violation of this Chapter; (e) intentionally discloses, or endeavours to disclose, to any other unauthorised person the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, intercepted by means authorised by section 39; (f) intentionally continues the interception of wire, electronic or oral communication after the issue of an order of rejection by the Competent Authority under this Chapter; (g) intentionally continues the interception of wire, electronic or oral communication after the issue of an order of disapproval by the Review Committee under sub-section (3) of section 46, shall for such violation be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine up to rupees fifty thousand.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionControl of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 17
Title: Interception and Disclosure of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communications Prohibited
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....by section 14; (ii) Knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of such a communication in connection with a criminal investigation under this Act; (iii) Having obtained or recorded any information in connection with a criminal investigation; and (iv) With intend to improperly obstruct, impede or interfere with a duly authorized criminal investigation; or (v) Intentionally continues the interception of wire, electronic or oral communication after the specific order of disapproval by the Review Committee under sub-section (4) of section 16; Shall for such violation be punished with imprisonment for a term, which may extend to one year and fine which may extend to rupees fifty thousand.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 92
Title: Exclusion of Evidence of Oral Agreement
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....or their representatives in interest, for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to, or subtracting from, its terms: Proviso (1).-Any fact may be proved which would invalidate any document, or which would entitle any person to any decree or order relating thereto; such as fraud, intimidation, illegality, want of due execution, want of capacity in any contracting party 1 [want or failure] of consideration, or mistake in fact or taw: Proviso (2).-The existence of any separate oral agreement as to any matter on which a document is silent, and which is not inconsistent with its terms, may be proved. In considering whether or not this proviso applies, the Court shall have regard to the degree of formality of the document: Proviso (3).-The existence of any separate oral agreement, constituting a condition precedent to the attaching of any obligation under any such contract, grant or disposition of property, may be proved. Proviso (4).-The existence of any distinct subsequent oral agreement to rescind or modify any such contract, grant or disposition of property, may be proved, except in cases in which such contract, grant or disposition of property is by law.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Chapter 4
Title: Of Oral Evidence
State: Central
Year: 1872
..... Section 60 - Oral evidence must be direct Oral evidence must, in all cases whatever, be direct; that is to say-- If it refers to a fact which could be seen, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he saw it; If it refers to a fact which could be heard, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he heard it; If it refers to a fact which could be perceived by any other sense or in any other manner, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he perceived it by that senseor in that manner; If it refers to an opinion or to the grounds on which that opinion is held, it must be the evidence of the person who holds that opinion on those grounds: Provided that the opinions of experts expressed in any treatise commonly offered for sate, and the grounds on which such opinions are held, may be proved by the production of such treatises if the author is dead or cannot be found, or has become incapable of giving evidence, or cannot be called as a witness without an amount of delay or expense which the Court regards as unreasonable: Provided also that, if oral evidence refers to the existence or condition of any material thing other than a document, the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 314
Title: Oral Arguments and Memorandum of Arguments
State: Central
Year: 1973
(1) Any party to a proceeding may, as soon as may be after the close of his evidence, address concise oral arguments, and may, before he concludes the oral arguments, if any, submit a memorandum to the Court setting forth concisely and under distinct headings, the arguments in support of his case and every such memorandum shall form part of the record. (2) A copy of every such memorandum shall be simultaneously furnished to the opposite party. (3) No adjournment of the proceedings shall be granted for the purpose of filing the written arguments unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, considers it necessary to grant such adjournment. (4) The Court may, if it is of opinion that the oral arguments are not concise or relevant, regulate such arguments.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPrevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 [Repealed] Section 38
Title: Application for Authorization of Interception of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communication
State: Central
Year: 2002
.....identity of the investigating officer making the application, and the head of the department authorising the application; (b) a statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that an order should be issued, including- (i) details as to the offence of terrorist act that has been, is being, or is about to be committed; (ii) a particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; (iii) a particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; and (iv) the identity of the person, if known, committing the terrorist act whose communications are to be intercepted; (c) a statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained, if the nature of the enquiry is such that the authorisation of interception should not automatically terminate after the described type of communication has been first obtained; (d) a particular description of facts establishing probable cause to believe that additional communications of the same type will occur thereafter; and (e) where the application is for the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIncome Tax Act, 1961 Section 164A
Title: Charge of Tax in Case of Oral Trust
State: Central
Year: 1961
Where a trustee receives or is entitled to receive any income on behalf or for the benefit of any person under an oral trust, then, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, tax shall be charged on such income at the maximum marginal rate. Explanation: For the purposes of this section, - (i) [Omitted by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, with effect from 1st April, 1989;] (ii) oral trust shall have the meaning assigned to it in Explanation 2 below sub-section (1) of section 160.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial