Bare Act Search Results
The Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 1949 Chapter 79
Title: CHAPTER XIV
State: Assam
Year: 1949
COMMENTS In the case of Abdul Gafur Darbhuyan v. Mustakim Ali [AIR 1970 Assam & Nagaland 96], their Lordships held that by virtue of sub-S. (2), the jurisdiction of the civil court is not barred where the
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Section 3
Title: Amendments to Enactment; Power of State Government to Confer Powers and Impose Duties on Commission???ers Under Any Law
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1957
capability of its abuse or misuse cannot alter the nature of the powers. In the instant case, their Lordships have already said that the power was only a power to give effect to the conditions attached to
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Assam Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Preamble 5
Title: Restrictions on power of Licensing Authority
State: Assam
Year: 1953
the cinematograph Act, 1952. in the case of Tajdin Javerbhai v. Union Territory [AIR 1967 Goa 158], their Lordships observed that the order of the Licensing Authority on the application for license, is purely administrative and as
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBrief the judgments behind these acts
The Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 Section 3
Title: lays down classes of Civil Courts and as such the Registrar of a High Court is not authorised to determine the question
State: Assam
Year: 1887
the Court of Assistant District Judge. [Mangilal Agarwalla v. Jamunalal Agarwalla, AIR 1971 Assam and Nagaland 122]. Their Lordships in the case of Satish Chandra Bairhya v. Pannatal Jain [AIR 1978 Gau 2] considered the amendment to
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMussalman Wakf Validating Act 1930 Section 1
Title: MUSSALMAN WAKF VALIDATING ACT 1930
State: Central
Year: 1930
Act. A doubt was cast on this doctrine by the Privy Council in several cases in which their Lordships held such bequests illegal as obnoxious to the rule against perpetuities As Act 6 of 1913 was merely
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLand Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 Section 4
Title: NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BEFORE WORKING MINES LYING UNDER LAND If the person for the time being immediately entitled to work
State: Central
Year: 1885
except as regards the further progress of the working. The opposite view, as was pointed out by their Lordships would involve somewhat serious consequences, and it is obviously necessary that there should be no mistake as to
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionHindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930 Preamble 1
Title: Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930
State: Central
Year: 1930
the latter-day commentators and the decisions based thereon, The opinion of many eminent British Indian Judges, including their Lordships of the Privy Council, who have approached the subject without prepossession, is distinctly in favour of the principle
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionHindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930 Section 1
Title: HINDU GAINS OF LEARNING ACT, 1930
State: Central
Year: 1930
the latter-day commentators and the decisions based thereon, The opinion of many eminent British Indian Judges, including their Lordships of the Privy Council, who have approached the subject without prepossession, is distinctly in favour of the principle
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPublic Suits Validation Act, 1932 Section 1
Title: SHORT TITLE AND EXTENT
State: Central
Year: 1932
to the Collector, or to the special officer, generally, and not in respect of each particular suit. Their Lordships of the Privy Council, however, have in a recent case held that the previous sanction of the Local
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 1949 Preamble 1
Title: Preamble.
State: Assam
Year: 1949
factory run by a Co-operative Society, when exempted on payment of such duty was discriminatory or not. Their Lordships held that such exemption does not fall under discrimination. Similar question also arose in the cases of P.V.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI research tools - 7 days free