Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: loiterCantonments Act, 1924 Section 236
Title: Penalty for Loitering and Importuning for Purposes of Prostitution
State: Central
Year: 1924
.....Naval] or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the3[Officer Commanding the station], in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of a sub-inspector4[or a sergeant] who is employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the3[Officer Commanding the station]4[with the concurrence of the District Magistrate]. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 134, for "two hundred rupees" (w.e.f. 1-10-1983). 2. Inserted by Act 15 of 1983, section 134 (w.e.f. 1-10-1983). 3. Substituted by Act 7 of 1925, section 14, for "commanding Officer of the Cantonment". 4. Inserted by Act 7 of 1931, sec 7.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 2006 Section 300
Title: Penalty for Loitering and Importuning for Purposes of Prostitutionn
State: Central
Year: 2006
(1) Whoever in a cantonment loiters for the purpose of prostitution or importunes any person to the commission of sexual immorality, shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees and in case of subsequent offence shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year. (2) No prosecution for an offence under this section shall be instituted except on the complaint of the person importuned, or of a military officer in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a member of the Military, Naval or Air Force Police, being employed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station, in whose presence the offence was committed, or of a police officer not below the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector, who is deployed in the cantonment and authorised in this behalf by the Officer Commanding the Station with the concurrence of District Magistrate.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionEDUCATION ACT, 1983 Section 26
Title: Prohibition of loitering near examination's centre, etc.
State: Karnataka
Year: 1983
No person, save in the discharge of his duties or orders of his superiors, shall during the hours when an examination is conducted or any evaluation or tabulation work relating to any examination is done and one hour preceding the commencement of such examination, evaluation or tabulation work, loiter within the premises wherein the examination is held or evaluation or tabulation work is done or at any public or private place within a distance of one hundred meters from such premises: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply in respect of bonafide activities of any such person.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 1924 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1924
.....any farm, cattle-shed, milk-store, milk-shop or other place from which milk is supplied or in which milk is kept for purposes of sale or is manufactured for sale into butter, ghee, cheese or curds, and, in relation to a dairyman who does not occupy any premises for the sale of milk, includes any place in which he keeps the vessels used by him for the storage or sale of milk; (xi) "dairyman" includes the keeper of a cow, buffalo, goat, ass or other animal, the milk of which is offered or is intended to be offered for sale for human consumption, and any purveyor of milk and any occupier of a dairy; a[(xia) "Defence Estates Officer" means the officer appointed by the Central Government to perform the duties of the Defence Estates Officer for the purposes of this Act and the rules made thereunder; (xib) "Director" means the officer appointed by the Central Government to perform the duties of the Director, Defence Lands and Cantonments, the Command, for the purposes of this Act and rules made thereunder and includes the Joint Director;] a[c[(xic) "entitled consumer" means a person in a cantonment who is paid from the Defence Services Estimates and is authorised by general or.....
List Judgments citing this sectionTerrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1985
.....(t) the entry into, and search of, any place whatsoever reasonably suspected of being used for harbouring terrorists or disruptionists or for manufacturing or storing anything for use for purpose of terrorist acts or disruptive activities. (3) The rules made under sub -section (1) may further- (a) provide for the arrest and trial of persons contravening any of the rules or any order issued thereunder; (b) provide that any contravention of, or any attempt to contravene, or any abetment of, or any attempt to abet the contravention of any of the provisions of the rules or any order issued under any such provision, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years or for a term which may not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years or with fine or with imprisonment as aforesaid and fine; (c) provide for the seizure, detention and forfeiture of any property in respect of which such contravention, attempt or abetment as is referred to in clause (b) has been committed and for the adjudication of such seizure and forfeiture, whether by any court or by any other authority; (d) confer powers and impose duties as respects any matter upon.....
List Judgments citing this sectionTerrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1987
.....the said Act was restricted to a period of two years from the date of commencement. However, it was subsequently realised that on account of various factors, what were stray incidents in the beginning have now become a continuing menace specially in State like Punjab. On the basis of experience, it was felt that in order to combat and cope with terrorist and disruptive activities effectively it is not only necessary to continue the said law but also to strengthen it further. The aforesaid Act of 1985 was due to expire on the 23rd May, 1987. Since both Houses of Parliament were not in session, and it was necessary to take immediate action, the President promulgated the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Ordinance, 1987 (2 of 1987), on the 23rd May, 1987, which came into force with effect from the 24th May, 1987. 2. The Ordinance included all the provisions of the Act of 1985, except the following main changes, namely :(a) punishments for terrorist acts and disruptive were made more deterrent; (b) the Central Government has also been empowered to constitute Designated Courts; (c) the exhaustive enumeration of rule-making powers, as contained in Sec. 5 of the 1985 Act,.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 2006 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 2006
.....any farm, cattle-shed, milk-store, milk-shop or other place from which milk is supplied or in which milk is kept for purposes of sale or is manufactured for the sale into butter, ghee, cheese or curds, and, in relation to a dairyman who does not occupy any premises for the sale of milk, includes any place in which he keeps the vessels used by him for the storage or sale of milk; (l) "dairyman" includes the keeper of a cow, buffalo, goat, ass or other animal, the milk of which is offered or is intended to be offered for sale for human consumption, and any supplier of milk and any occupier of a dairy; (m) "dangerous disease" means cholera, leprosy, enteric fever, smallpox, tuberculosis, diphtheria, plague, influenza, venereal disease, hepatitis, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome and any other epidemic, endemic, infectious or communicable disease which the Board may by public notice, declare to be, an infectious, contagious or communicable disease for the purposes of this Act; (n) "Defence Estates Circle" means one of the circles into which India is, for the purposes of defence estates management, for the time being divided, and includes any area which the Central.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Orissa Conduct of Examinations Act, 1988 Complete Act
State: Orissa
Year: 1988
THE ORISSA CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS ACT, 1988 THE ORISSA CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS ACT, 1988 ORISSA ACT 2 OF 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE SECTIONS 1. Short title 2. Definitions 3. Prohibition of use of unfair means at examinations 4. Restriction on coples of question paper and offer of information 5. Prevention of leakage by person entrusted with examination work 6. Restriction of fake papers 7. Prohibition of loitering, etc. near Examination Centre, etc. 8. Refusal of duties connected with examination prohibited 9. Penalty 10. Investigation, etc. 11. Effect of other laws SCHEDULE [THE ORISSA CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS ACT, 1988] [For Statement of Objects and Reasons see Orissa Gazette, Extraordinary, dated the 26th February, 1988 (No. 367).] ORISSA ACT 2 OF 1988 [Received the assent of the Governor on the 11th March 1988, first published in an extraordinary issue of the Orissa Gazette, dated the 11th March 1988] AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR FINAL ACTION FOR ADOPTION OF UNFAIR MEANS AT CERTAIN EXAMINATIONS HELD IN THE STATE AND OTHER MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH BE it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Orissa in the Thirty-ninth.....
List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 1924 Chapter XIV
Title: Removal and Exclusion from Cantonments and Suppression of Sexual Immorality
State: Central
Year: 1924
..... ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 15of 1983, section 136, for "Armed Forces of the Union" (w.e.f. 1-10-1983). 2.Substituted by Act 7 of1925, section 14, for "Commanding Officer of the cantonment". 3.Substituted by the A.O.1937, for "L.G.". 4.Substituted by the A.O.1937, for "refer the case to the G.G. in C., who shall pass such ordersthereon as he thinks fit". Section 240 - Penalty Whoever-- (a) fails to comply with an order issued under this Chapter within the period specified therein, or, whilst an order prohibiting him from re-entering a cantonment without permission is in force, re-enters the cantonment without such permission, or (b) knowing that any person has, under this Chapter, been required to remove from the cantonment and has not obtained the requisite permission to re-enter it, harbours or conceals such person in the cantonment, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to1[five hundred rupees], and, in the case of a continuing offence, with an additional fine which may extend to2[fifty rupees] for every day after the first during which he has persisted in the offence. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 15 of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCriminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 Section 7
Title: Molesting a Person to Prejudice of Employment or Business
State: Central
Year: 1932
.....to five hundred rupees, or with both. Explanation.-- Encouragement of indigenous industries or advocacy of temperance, without the commission of any of the acts prohibited by this section is not an offence under this section. (2) No Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under this section except upon a report in writing of facts which constitute such offence made by a police officer not below the rank of officer in charge of a police station. OBJECTS AND RFASONS The explanation emphasises the fact that the section is not intended to hamper lawful advocacy of swadeshi or abstention from intoxicating liquor. See S.C.R. ________________________ 1. Section 7 was enforced in Kutch, Saurashtra and Hyderabad areas of the State of Bombay from 24-8-1959. It was also enforced in the districts of Dehra Dun, Saharanpur, Moradabad, Mirzapur, Basil, Gorakhpur, Deoria Muzaffarnagar, Aligarh and Rampur; Lalitpur and Gaziabad w.e.f. 31-8-1977.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial