Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: lodging

The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1947

.....respect of the same premises have been duly fixed by a competent Court pn the merits of the case, without any fraud or collusion or an error of the facts, and there has been no structural alterations or change in the amentities or in respect of any other factor which are relevant to the fixation of the standard rent, or change in such increases, thereafter in the premises.] _________________________ 1. Section 11A was inserted by Mah. 14 of 1963, section 4. Section 12 - No ejectment ordinarily to be made if tenant pays or is ready and willing to pay standard rent and permitted increases (1) A landlord shall not be entitled to the recovery of possession of any premises so long as the tenant pays, or is ready and willing to pay, the amount of the standard rent and permitted increases, if any, and observes and performs the other conditions of the tenancy, in so far as they are consistent with the provisions of this Act. (2) No suit for recovery of possession shall be instituted by a landlord against tenant on the ground of non-payment of the standard rent or permitted increases due, until the expiration of one month next after notice in writing of the demand of the.....

List Judgments citing this section

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Repealed] Chapter V

Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses

State: Central

Year: 1958

.....of this clause, "nuisance" shall be deemed to include anyact which constitutes an offence under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic inWomen and Girls Act, 1956 (104 of 1956); (b)that the accommodation is reasonably and bona fide required by the owner of thehotel or lodging house, as the case may be, either for his own occupation or forthe occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held, or anyother cause which may be deemed satisfactory to the Controller; (c)that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of theperiod of the agreement in respect thereof; (d)that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose forwhich the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adverselyor substantially- the owner's interest therein; (c)that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Delhi Rent Act, 1995 Chapter V

Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses

State: Central

Year: 1995

.....the purposes of this clause, "nuisance" shall be deemed to include any act which constitutes an offence under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956(104 of 1956); (b) that the accommodation is reasonably and bona fide required by the owner of the hotel or lodging house, as the case may be either for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held or any other cause which may be deemed satisfactory to the Rent Authority; (c) that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of the period of the agreement in respect thereof; (d) that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adversely or substantially the owner's interest therein; (e) that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Repealed] Chapter IV

Title: Hotels and Lodging Houses

State: Central

Year: 1952

.....for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held, or any other cause which may be deemed satisfactory by the Controller; (c) that the lodger has failed to vacate the accommodation on the termination of the period of the agreement in respect thereof; (d) that the lodger has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which the accommodation was given to him or which is likely to affect adversely or substantially the owner's interest therein; (e) that the lodger has failed to pay the rent due from him. Section 29 - Appeals (1) Any person aggrieved by the order of the Controller under this Chapter may, within fifteen days on which the order is communicated to him, prefer an appeal in writing to the Chief Commissioner. (2) The Chief commissioner shall call for the record of the Controller and after examining the record and after making such further inquiry as he thinks fit either personally or through the Controller, shall decide the appeal. (3) The decision of the Chief Commissioner and subject only to such decision, the order of the Controller shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be final. .....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Rajasthan Tax on Luxuries (in Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act, 1990 Complete Act

State: Rajasthan

Year: 1990

.....stay the recovery of such demand or any part thereof, during the tendency of the appeal if the hotelier furnishes sufficient security to his satisfaction in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed : Provided further that where recovery of tax or any part thereof is stayed under the preceding proviso, the amount of such demand shall be recoverable with interest at the prescribed rate on the amount ultimately found due, and such interest shall be payable on such amount from the date it first became due. (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (3), the Luxury Tax Officer may recover the demand payable in the prescribed manner by attachment and sale of movable or immovable property of the defaulting hotelier. 19. Special mode of recovery.- The provisions of special mode of recovery under section (Substituted by Raj. Act No. 9 of 1997, w.e.f. 30.3.1997.) [53] of the Sales Tax Act shall mutatis mutandis apply in the case of recovery of tax including penalty and interest under this Act. 20. Levy of Interest.- If a hotelier does not pay tax within the time he is required to pay tax under the provisions of this Act or does not deposit any demand.....

List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 148A

Title: Right to Lodge a Caveat

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....of the application on the caveator. (4) Where a notice of any caveat has been served on the applicant, he shall forthwith furnish the caveator at the caveator's expense, with a copy of the application made by him and also with copies of any paper or document which has been, or may be, filed by him in support of the application. (5) Where a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), such caveat shall not remain in force after the expiry of ninety days from the date on which it was lodged unless the application referred to in sub-section (1) has been made before the expiry of the said period.] _________________ 1. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 50 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries (Hotels & Lodging Houses) (Amendment) Act, 1991 Complete Act

State: Meghalaya

Year: 1991

THE MEGHALAYA TAX ON LUXURIES (HOTELS & LODGING HOUSES) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1991 THE MEGHALAYA TAX ON LUXURIES (HOTELS & LODGING HOUSES) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1991 An Act Further to amend the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries( Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act 1991. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Meghalaya in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows :- Short title and commencement. 1. (1) The Act may be called the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries Hotel and Lodging Houses) (Amendment) Act, 2011. (2) It shall come into force at once. Amendment of Section 3 2. In section 3 of the Meghalaya Tax on Luxuries(Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act, 1991, for clauses (a),(b),(c),(d),(e) and (f), the following new clauses (a),(b),(c), ),(d),(e) and (f), shall be substituted, namely:- "(a) is below Rs.200/- .5% (b) exceeds Rs.200/- but does not exceed Rs.500/- .......7% (c) exceeds Rs.500/- but does not exceed Rs.1000/- .8% (d) exceeds Rs 1000/- but does not exceed Rs.2500/- 10% (e) exceeds Rs.2500/- 20% Meghalaya State Acts

List Judgments citing this section

The Tripura Tax on Luxuries in Hotels and Lodging Houses Act, 1990 Complete Act

State: Tripura

Year: 1990

.....the proprietor within the time specified therefor in the notice or in the order permitting payment of instalments or in any other provision of this Act or rule made thereunder, the proprietor shall pay, in addition to the amount of such tax, penalty or instalment, interest at the rate of two rupees for every one hundred rupees or part thereof for each month or part thereof, from the date specified for its payment. 11. Appeal- (1) Any proprietor aggrieved by the order of assessment made under section 7 or section 8 or by an order imposing penalty under section 9 may within thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, appeal to the appellate authority : Provided that the appellate authority may admit an appeal preferred after the period of thirty days aforesaid, if it is satisfied that the proprietor had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within that period. (2) The appeal shall be in such form and verified in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be accompanied by a fee calculated at the rate of two per cent of the tax or penalty under dispute subject to minimum of rupees fifty and maximum of rupees one thousand. (3) On receipt of an appeal under.....

List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Section 308B

Title: Lodging of Account with the Returning Officer

State: Karnataka

Year: 1993

Section 308B - Lodging of account with the returning officer 1 [308B. Lodging of account with the returning officer.-- Every contesting candidate at the election to the Zilla Panchayat or Taluk Panchayat under this Act shall within thirty days from the date of election of the returned candidate or, if there are more than one returned candidate at the election and the dates of the election are different, the later of those two dates lodge with the Returning Officer appointed at an election under this Act an account of his election expenses which shall be a true copy of the account kept by him or by his election agent under section 308A.] ______________________ 1. 308A to 308D Inserted by Act 37 of 2003 w.e.f. 1.10.2003.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Section 308C

Title: Failure to Lodge an Account of Election Expenses

State: Karnataka

Year: 1993

Section 308C - Failure to lodge an account of election expenses 1 [308C. Failure to lodge an account of election expenses.-- If the State Election Commission is satisfied that any person,- (a) has failed to lodge an account of election expenses within the time and in the manner required by or under this Act; and (b) has no good reason or justification for the failure; the State Election Commission shall by order published in the Official Gazette declare him to be disqualified and any such person shall be disqualified for a period of six years from the date of the order.] ______________________ 1. 308A to 308D Inserted by Act 37 of 2003 w.e.f. 1.10.2003.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //