Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: load shedding Page 1 of about 781 results (0.009 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialThe Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 Complete Act
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1969
.....AND WELFARE) ACT, 1969 MAHARASHTRA ACT No. XXX of 1969 [ MAHARASHTRA MATHADI, HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND WELFAI ACT, 1969] [Act received the assent of the Vice-President acting as the President, on the 5th June 1969; assent was first published in Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary, Part IV, on the 13th June 1969]. Amended by Mah. 27 of 1972 Amended by Mah. 40 of 19742 (10.9.1974) Amended by Mah. 27 of 1977 (1.6.1977) Amended by Mah. 62 of 1981 (15.1.1982) Amended by Mah. 28 of 1987 (5.8.1987) Amended by Mah. 27 of 1990. For Statement of Objects and Reasons see Maharashtra Government Gazette 1968 Part V pages 503 -506. An Act for regulating the employment of unprotected manual workers employed in certain employments in the State of Maharashtra to make provision for their adequate supply and proper and full utilization in such employments, and for matters connected therewith. WHEREAS, it is expedient to regulate the employment of unprotected manual workers such as, Mathadi, Hamal etc., engaged in certain employments, to make better provision for their terms and conditions of employments, to provide for their welfare, and for health.....
List Judgments citing this sectionWest Bengal Mazdoor, Tindal, Loader, Godownman and Other Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 Complete Act
State: West Bengal
Year: 1981
.....or a representative of an employer, who is a defaulter in paying contribution under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952,or the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, or the West Bengal Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1974. (2) The State Government may remove from office any member of a Board if he (a) is or has become subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in sub-section (1); or (b) is absent without leave of the Board in more than three consecutive meetings of the Board. (3) Where, in the opinion of the State Government, any person nominated to represent the employers or the unprotected workers on a Board has ceased to represent such employers or workers, the State Government may by notification declare that with effect from such date as may be specified therein such person shall cease to be a member of the Board. Section 12 Resignation of office by member Any member of a Board may at any time resign his office by writing under his hand addressed to the State Government, and his office shall, on acceptance of the resignation, become vacant. Section 13 Filling up of vacancies In the event of any vacancy occurring in the office of a.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978 [1] Complete Act
State: Kerala
Year: 1978
.....objections and suggestions received within one month of the publication of such draft in the Gazette. (2) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder a scheme made under sub section (1) may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:- (a) for the welfare of headload workers; (b) for health and safety measures for headload workers; (c) for the constitution of any fund or funds including provident fund for the benefit of headload workers, the vesting of such funds, the payment of contributions to be made to such funds and all matters relating thereto; (d) for regulating the recruitment and entry into the scheme of the headload workers, and the registration of headload workers and employers including the maintenance of registers, removal either temporarily or permanently, of names from the registers and the imposition of fee for registration; (e) for regulating the employment of headload workers and the terms and conditions of such employment, including maternity benefit, leave with wages, provision for gratuity and conditions as to weekly and other holidays and pay in respect thereof; (f) for pooling of headload workers who.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMinimum Wages Act, 1948 Schedule I
Title: Schedule
State: Central
Year: 1948
.....of this Act in any area in respect of any employment specified in such entry, and such rates shall, subject to the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the principal Act, continue in force in such area as if they are specified in the Schedule to the principal Act as amended by this section. [Vide Gujarat Act 22 of 1961, sec. 5 (w.e.f. 18-5-1961)] Maharashtra.--(1) In the Schedule to the principal Act, in Part I, the following entries shall be deleted, namely:-- (a) the entries-- (i) "Employment in salt pan industry", (ii) "Employment in any residential hotel, restaurant or eating house as defined in the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948", (iii) "Employment in any industry in which any process of printing by letter-press, lithography, photogravure or other similar work, or work incidental to such process or book-binding is carried on", and (iv) "Employment in any cotton ginning or cotton pressing manufactory", as added to the said Schedule in its application to Bombay area of the State of Maharashtra: (b) the entries-- (i) "13. Employment in glass Industry", (ii) "14. Employment in oil mills", (iii) "15. Employment of transport.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Kerala Loading and Unloading ( Regulation of Wages and Restriction of Unlawful Practices)act, 2002 [1] Complete Act
State: Kerala
Year: 2002
.....OF UNLAWFUL PRACTICES)ACT, 2002 [1] ACT 10 OF 2002 THE KERALA LOADING AND UNLOADING ( REGULATION OF WAGES AND RESTRICTION OF UNLAWFUL PRACTICES)ACT, 2002 [1] An Act to regulate the wages and to restrict unlawful practices connected with loading and unloading and transportation of goods and articles and for matters connected therewith. Preamble .-WHEREAS it is expedient to regulate the wages and to restrict unlawful practices connected with loading and unloading and transportation of goods and articles and for matters connected therewith ; BE it enacted in the Fifty-Third year of the Republic of India as follows:- CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement :- (1) This Act may be called the Kerala Loading and Unloading (Regulation of wages and Restriction of Unlawful Practices) Act, 2002. (2) It extends to the whole of the State of Kerala. (3) It shall come into force on such date as the Government may by notification in the Official Gazette appoint and different dates may be appointed for different areas and for different provisions of this Act. 2. Definitions:- In this Act, unless the context otherwise.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMerchant Shipping Act, 1958 Section 323
Title: Inspection and Control of Load Line Convention Ships Other Than Indian Ships
State: Central
Year: 1958
.....lines on the ship are not in the position specified in the certificate, the ship may be detained until the matter has been rectified to the satisfaction of the surveyor. (5) If it is found 5 [on any inspection under sub-section (2) or, as the case may be, sub-section (2A)] that the ship has been so materially altered in respect of the matters referred to in clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (2) that the ship is manifestly unfit to proceed to sea without danger to human life, the ship shall be deemed to be unsafe for the purpose of section 336 (in the case of an Indian ship) or for the purpose of section 342 (in the case of any other ship): Provided that where the ship has been detained under either of the last-mentioned sub-sections, the Central Government shall order the ship to be released as soon as, it is satisfied that the ship is fit to proceed to sea without danger to human life. (6) If a valid international load line certificate 6 [or, as the case may be, international load line exemption certificate] is not produced to the surveyor on such demand as aforesaid the surveyor shall have the same power of inspecting the ship, for the purpose of seeing that the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 1924 Section 162
Title: Destruction of Infectious Hut or Shed
State: Central
Year: 1924
(1) Where the destruction of any hut or shed in a cantonment is, in the opinion of the1[Board], necessary to prevent the spread of any infectious or contagious disease, the1[Board] may, by notice in writing, require the owner to destroy the hut or shed and the materials thereof within such time as may be specified in the notice. (2) Where the President of a Board2[* * *] is satisfied that the destruction of any hut or shed in the cantonment is immediately necessary for the purpose of preventing the spread of any infectious or contagious disease, he may order the owner or occupier of the hut or shed to destroy the same forthwith, or may himself cause it to be destroyed after giving not less than two hours notice to the owner or occupier thereof. (3) The1[Board] shall pay compensation to the owner of any hut or shed destroyed under this section. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 24 of 1936, section 69, for "Cantonment Autority". 2. The words "for, where there is no Board, the Officer Commanding the station" omitted by Act 24 of 1936, section 40.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNew Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 Section 280
Title: Insanitary Huts and Sheds
State: Central
Year: 1994
Where the Chairperson upon any information in his possession is satisfied that any hut or shed used as a dwelling house or as a stable or for any other purpose, is likely, by reason of its being constructed without a plinth or upon a plinth of insufficient height or without proper means of drainage or on account of the impracticability of scavenging and cleansing it or owing to the manner in which it and other huts or sheds are crowded together, to cause risk of disease to the inmates thereof or to the inhabitants of the neighbourhood, or is for any reason likely to endanger public health or safety, he may by notice in writing require the owner or occupier of the hut or shed or the owner or occupier of the land on which the hut or shed stands to remove or alter the hut or shed or carry out such improvement thereof as the Chairperson may deem necessary within such time as may be specified in the notice.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNew Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 Section 285
Title: Destruction of Infectious Huts or Sheds
State: Central
Year: 1994
(1) Where the destruction of any hut or shed is in the opinion of the Chairperson necessary to prevent the spread of any dangerous disease, the Chairperson may by notice in writing require the owner to destroy the hut or shed and the materials thereof within such time as may be specified in the notice. (2) Where the Chairperson is satisfied that the destruction of any hut or shed is immediately necessary for the purpose of preventing the spread of any dangerous disease, he may order the owner or occupier of the hut or shed to destroy the same forthwith or may himself cause it to be destroyed after giving not less than six hours' notice to the owner or occupier. (3) Compensation may be paid by the Chairperson, in any case which he thinks fit, to any person who sustains substantial loss by the destruction of any such hut or shed, but, except as so allowed by the Chairperson, no claim for compensation shall lie for any loss or damage caused by any exercise of the power conferred by this section.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCantonments Act, 2006 Section 169
Title: Destruction of Infection Hut or Shed
State: Central
Year: 2006
(1) Where the destruction of any hut or shed in a cantonment is, in the opinion of the Board, necessary to prevent the spread of any infectious or contagious disease, the Board may, by notice in writing, require the owner to destroy the hut or shed and the materials thereof within such time as may be specified in the notice. (2) Where the President of a Board is satisfied that the destruction of any hut or shed in the cantonment is immediately necessary for the purpose of preventing the spread of any infectious or contagious disease, he may order the owner or occupier of the hut or shed to destroy the same forthwith, or may himself cause it to be destroyed after giving not less than two hours' notice to the owner or occupier thereof. (3) The Board shall pay compensation to the owner of any hut or shed destroyed under this section.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial