Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: letter ruling

Bombay High Court (Letters Patent) Act, 1866, (Maharashtra) Preamble

Title: the Bombay High Court (Letters Patent) Act, 1866

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1866

.....of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, and also in respect of all such persons beyond such limits over whom the said High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal shall have criminal jurisdiction at the date of the publication of these presents;" And whereas it is expedient to correct the two clerical errors in such section which are hereinbefore indicated by italics; It is hereby enacted as follows :- ____________________ 1. For Proceedings in Council relating to this Act, which was introduced and passed at one sitting see Gazette of India, 1886, Supplement p. 255. The short title was given by Bom. 2 of 1921. 2. General Statutory Rules and Orders.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Bombay High Court Letters Patents (Amendment) Act, 1948, (Maharashtra) Preamble

Title: the Bombay High Court Letters Patents (Amendment) Act, 1948

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1948

THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT LETTERS PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1948 [Act No. 41 of 19481] [4th May 1948] PREAMBLE An Act to amend the Letters Patent establishing the Supreme Court of Judicature at Bombay, bearing date the eighth day of December, One thousand Eight hundred and Twenty-three and to amend the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature for the Presidency of Bombay, bearing date the twenty-eighth day of December, One thousand and Eight hundred and Sixty-five. WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the Letters Patent establishing the Supreme Court of Judicature at Bombay, bearing date the eighth day of December, One thousand Eight hundred and Twenty-three and to amend the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature for the Presidency of Bombay, bearing date the twenty-eighth day of December, One Thousand Eight hundred and Sixty-five, for the purposes hereinafter appearing; It is hereby enacted as follows :- _______________________ 1. For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1948 Part V, p. 220.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Bombay High Court Letters Patents (Amendment) Act, 1948, (Maharashtra) Section 2

Title: Amendment of Letters Patent of 8th December, 1823

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1948

In the Letters Patent establishing the Supreme Court of Judicature at Bombay, bearing date the eighth day of December, One thousand Eight hundred and Twenty-three - (1) in paragraph 21 - (a) after the words "Judicature at Bombay" where they occur for the first time, the words "and of the Bombay City Civil Court" shall be inserted; (b) after the words "Judicature at Bombay" where they occur for the second time, the words "or to the said Bombay City Civil Court, as the case may be," shall be inserted; (c) after the word "respectively" the words "or by the Bombay City Civil Court or by any Judge of the said Court" shall be inserted; (2) in paragraph 22 - (a) after the words "Judicature at Bombay" where they occur for the first time, the words "or the Bombay City Civil Court" shall be inserted; (b) after the words "Judicature at Bombay" where they occur for the second time, the words "or the said Bombay City Civil Court, as the case may be," shall be inserted; (c) for the word "Court" where it occurs at the end, the word "Courts" shall be substituted; (3) in paragraph 23 - (a) after the words "said Court" where they occur for the first time, the words "or of the sa

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Bombay High Court Letters Patents (Amendment) Act, 1948, (Maharashtra) Section 3

Title: Amendment of Letters Patent of 28th December, 1865

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1948

(1) In the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature for the Presidency of Bombay, bearing date the twenty-eighth day of December, One thousand Eight hundred and Sixty-five - (1) in clause 12, for the words "in which the debt, or damage, or value of property sued for does not exceed one hundred rupees" the words "or the Bombay City Civil Court" shall be substituted; (2) in clause 22 - (a) the words "within the local limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, and also" shall be deleted; (b) for the words "such limits" the local limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction" shall be substituted. (2) For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby declared that the amendments made by clause (2) of sub-section (1) shall not be deemed to affect any of the powers of the High Court under the provisions, for the time being in force, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 20

Title: Judgement and Decree

State: Central

Year: 1908

..... 1. Substituted by Act 66 of 1956, section 14, for rule 1. (w.e.f. 1-1-1957). 2. The provisions of rules 1, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable to the Chief Court of Oudh; see the Oudh Court Act, 1925 (U.P. 4 of 1925), section 16 (2). 3. Rule 1 renumbered as sub-rule (1) of that rule by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and substituted by Act 22 of 2002, section 13 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 4. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 5. Certain words omitted by Act 46 of 1999, section 28 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 6. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for "A Judge may" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 7. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for "names and description of the parties" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 8. Rules 6A and 6B inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and substituted by Act 46 of 1999, section 28 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 9. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 10. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for clause (b) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 2

Title: Payment Under Decree

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....any money payable under a decree of any kind is paid out of Court, 1 [or a decree of any kind is otherwise adjusted] in whole or in part to the satisfaction of the decree-holder, the decree-holder shall certify such payment of adjustment to the Court whose duty it is to execute the decree, and the Court shall record the same accordingly. (2) The judgment-debtor 2 [or any person who has become surety for the judgment-debtor] also may inform the Court of such payment or adjustment, and apply to the Court to issue a notice to the decree-holder to show cause, on a day to be fixed by the Court, why such payment or adjustment should not be recorded as certified ; and if, after service of such notice, the decree-holder fails to show cause why the payment or adjustment should not be recorded as certified, the Court shall record the same accordingly, 3 [(2A) No payment or adjustment shall be recorded at the instance of the judgment-debtor unless-- (a) the payment is made in the manner provided in rule 1; or (b) the payment or adjustment is proved by documentary evidence; or (c) the payment or adjustment is admitted by, or on behalf of, the decree-holder in his reply to the.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 97 to 106

Title: Resistance of Delivery of Possession to Decree-holder or Purchaser

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....or objection made under rule 58.] 3[106. Setting aside orders passed ex parte, etc. (1) The applicant, against whom an order is made under sub-rule (2) rule 105 or the opposite party against whom an order is passed ex parte under sub-rule (3) of that rule or under sub-rule (1) of rule 23, may apply to the Court to set aside the order, and if he satisfies the Court that there was sufficient cause for his non-appearance whom the application was called on for hearing, the Court shall set aside the order or such terms as to costs, or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for the further hearing of the application. (2) No order shall be made on an application under sub-rule (1) unless notice of the application has been served on the other party. (3) An application under sub-rule (1) shall be made within thirty days from the date of the order, or where, in the case of an ex parte order, the notice was not duly served, within thirty days from the date when applicant had knowledge of the order.] __________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 72(xxxiii), for sub-rule (2) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 2. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 35 to 37

Title: Decree in Appeal

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....to the Appellate Court and at their expense. 37. Certified copy of decree to be sent to Court whose decree appealed from A copy of the judgment and of the decree, certified by the Appellate Court or such officer as it appoints in this behalf, shall be sent to the Court which passed the decree appealed from and shall be filed with the original proceedings in the suit, and an entry of the judgment of the Appellate Court shall be made in the register of civil suits. _______________________ 1. This rule is not applicable to the Chief Court of Oudh in the exercise of its appellate Jurisdiction; see the Oudh Courts Act, 1925 (U.P. Act 4 of 1925), section 16(3).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Mulki Rules Act, 1972 Amending Act 1

Title: Mulki Rules (Repeal) Act, 1973

State: Central

Year: 1972

THE MULKI RULES (REPEAL) ACT, 1973 [Act, No. 68 of 1973] [28th December, 1973] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for the repeal of Mulki Rules. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-fourth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-- 1. Short title and commencement.-- (1) This Act may be called the Mulki Rules (Repeal) Act, 1973. (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 2. Definition.-- In this Act, "Mulki Rules" shall have the same meaning as in the Mulki Rules Act, 1972 (79 of 1972). 3. Repeal of Mulki Rules.-- Upon the commencement of this Act, the Mulki Rules as in force immediately before such commencement shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Mulki Rules Act, 1972, (79 of 1972) cease to have effect and are hereby repealed: Provided that such repeal shall not affect the validity of any appointment previously made in accordance with those rules.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Mulki Rules Act, 1972 Complete Act

Title: Mulki Rules Act, 1972

State: Central

Year: 1972

Preamble1 - MULKI RULES ACT, 1972 Section1 - Short title Section2 - Definitions Section3 - Limitation, during a specified period, of application of Mulki Rules to appointments to certain posts and validation of other appointments Section4 - Validation of certain specified appointments Section5 - Repeal of Mulki Rules except as to appointments to Certain posts Section6 - Repeal of Mulki Rules in respect of appointments to Schedule posts in the Capital area Section7 - Repeal of Mulki Rules in respect of appointments to Schedule posts in the remaining areas of Telangana ScheduleI - FIRST SCHEDULE ScheduleII - SECOND SCHEDULE Amending Act1 - MULKI RULES (REPEAL) ACT, 1973

List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //