Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: lessIncome Tax Act, 1961 Section 259
Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges (Omitted)
State: Central
Year: 1961
1[***] _________________________________ 1. Omitted by the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005, with effect from 28th December, 2005. Prior to omission, section 259 stood as under: 259. Case before High Court to be heard by not less than two Judges. (1) When any case has been referred to the High Court under section 256, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ, and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCentral Excise Act, 1944 Section 35J
Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges
State: Central
Year: 1944
1[xxx] ________________________________ 1. Omitted by the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005. Prior to omission, it read as under: "35J. Case before High Court to be heard by not less than two Judges. -- (1) When any case has been referred to the High Court under section 35G or section 35H, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it."
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, (Maharashtra) Section 40A
Title: Model Standing Orders in Respect of Additional or Altered Matters to Apply to Certain Workmen, if They Are Not Less Advantageous
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1946
1[40A. Model standing orders in respect of additional or altered matters to apply to certain workmen, if they are not less advantageous Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, any model standing orders made and notified in this Official Gazette by the State Government from time to time, in respect of any additional matters included in Schedule I, or any alteration made in that Schedule, on or after the date of commencement of Bombay Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 1977 (Mah. XLVII of 1977), shall unless such model standing orders are held by the Commissioner of Labour, to be less advantageous to the employees than the corresponding standing orders applicable to them, also apply in relation to such employees in the undertakings in respect of which standing orders have already been settled under section 35]. ___________________________ 1. This section was added by Mah. 47 of 1977, s. 5.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMinimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 15
Title: Wages of Worker Who Works for Less Than Normal Working Day
State: Central
Year: 1948
If an employee whose minimum rate of wages has been fixed under this Act by the day works on any day on which he was employed for a period less than the requisite number of hours constituting a normal working day, he shall, save as otherwise hereinafter provided, be entitled to receive wages in respect of work done by him on that day as if he had worked for a full normal working day: Provided, however, that he shall not be entitled to receive wages for a full normal working day-- (i) in any case where his failure to work is caused by his unwillingness to work and not by the omission of the employer to provide him with, and (ii) in such other cases and circumstances as may be prescribed.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionGovernment of India Act, 1858 [Repealed] Section 35
Title: Not Less Than One Tenth of Persons Recommended for Military Cadetships to Be Selected from Sons of Persons Who Have Served in India
State: Central
Year: 1858
Not less than One Tenth of the whole Number of Persons to be recommended in any Year for Military Cadetships (other than Cadetships in the Engineers and Artillery) shall be selected according to such Regulations as the Secretary of State in Council may from Time to Time make in this Behalf from among the Sons of Persons who have served in India in the Military or Civil Services of Her Majesty, or of the East India Company.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIncome Tax Act, 1961 Section 260B
Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges
State: Central
Year: 1961
(1) When an appeal has been filed before the High Court under section 260A, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court, and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority, if any, of such Judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then be heard upon that point only by one or more of the other Judges of the High Court and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it.]
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionWorking Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 Section 13
Title: Working Journalists Entitled to Wages at Rates Not Less Than Those Specified in the Order
State: Central
Year: 1955
On the coming into operation of an order of the Central Government under section 12, every working journalist shall be entitled to be paid by his employer wages at the rate which shall in no case be less than the rate of wages specified in the order.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionChristian Marriage Act1872 Section 43
Title: Petition to High Court to Order Certificate in Less Than Fourteen Days
State: Central
Year: 1872
When one of the parties intending marriage is a minor, and both such parties are at the time resident in any of the towns of Calcutta, Madras and Bombay, and are desirous of being married in less than fourteen days after the entry of such notice as aforesaid, they may apply by petition to a Judge of the High Court, for an order upon the Marriage Registrar to whom the notice of marriage has been given, directing him to issue his certificate before the expiration of the said fourteen days required by section 41. Order on petition. And on sufficient cause being shown, the said Judge may, in his discretion, make an order upon such Marriage Registrar, directing him to issue his certificate at any time to be mentioned in the said order before the expiration of the fourteen days so required. And the said Marriage Registrar on receipt of the said order, shall issue his certificate in accordance therewith.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 433
Title: Mischief by Destroying, Moving or Rendering Less Useful a Light-house or Sea-mark
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever commits mischief by destroying or moving any light-house or other light used as a sea-mark or any sea-mark or buoy or other thing placed as a guide for navigators, or by any act which renders any such light-house, sea-mark, buoy or other such thing as aforesaid less useful as a guide for navigators, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNavy Act, 1957 Section 125
Title: Finding That the Offence Was Committed with Intent Involving Less Degree of Punishment
State: Central
Year: 1957
Where the amount of punishment for any offence depends upon the intent with which it has been committed and any person is charged with having committed such an offence with an intent involving a greater degree of punishment, a court-martial may find that the offence was committed with an intent involving less degree of punishment and award such punishment accordingly.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial