Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: in writing Page 1 of about 7,843 results (0.052 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 145
Title: Cross-examination as to Previous Statements in Writing
State: Central
Year: 1872
1 145. Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him. _______________________ 1. As to the application of section 145 to police-diaries, see the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), section 172.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 73
Title: Comparison of Signature, Writing or Seal with Others Admitted or Proved
State: Central
Year: 1872
In order to ascertain whether a signature, writing, or seal is that of the person by whom it purports to have been written or made, any signature, writing, or seal admitted or proved to the satisfaction of the Court to have been written or made by that person may be compared with the one which is to be proved, although that signature, writing, or seal has not been produced or proved for any other purpose. The Court may direct any person present in court to write any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the Court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person. 1[This section applies also, with any necessary modifications, to finger-impressions. ________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 5 of 1899, section 3.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 261
Title: Effacing, Writing from Substance Bearing Government Stamp, or Removing from Document a Stamp Used for It, with Intent to Cause Loss to Government
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to the Government, removes or effaces from any substance, bearing any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, any writing or document for which such stamp has been used, or removes from any writing or document a stamp which has been used for such writing or document, in order that such stamp may be used for a different writing or document, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPatents Act, 1970 (39 of 1970) Section 68
Title: Assignments, Etc., Not to Be Valid Unless in Writing and Duly Executed
State: Central
Year: 1970
.....embodying all the terms and conditions governing their rights and obligations and the application for registration of such document is filed in the prescribed manner with * [the Controller within six months from the execution of the document or within such further period] not exceeding six months in the aggregate as the Controller on application made in the prescribed manner allows: Provided that the document shall when registered, have effect from the date of its execution. ___________________ * Substituted for "the Controller within six months from the commencement of this Act or the execution of the document, whichever is later or within such further period" by Patents (Amdt) Act, 2002. dated 25.06.2002 w.e.f 20.05.2003.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Contract Act, 1872 Section 25
Title: Agreement Without Consideration, Void, Unless It is in Writing and Registered, or is a Promise to Compensate for Something Done, or is a Promise to Pay a Debt Barred by Limitation Law
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....pay A's expenses in so doing. This is a contract. (e) A owes B Rs. 1,000, but the debt is barred by the Limitation Act. A signs a written promise to pay B Rs. 500 on account of the debt. This is a contract. (f) A agrees to sell a horse worth Rs. 1,000 for Rs. 10. A's consent to the agreement was freely given. The agreement is a contract notwithstanding the inadequacy of the consideration. (g) A agrees to sell a horse worth Rs. 1,000 for Rs. 10. A denies that his consent to the agreement was freely given. The inadequacy of the consideration is a fact which the Court should take into account in considering whether or not A's consent was freely given. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 12 of 1891, section 2 and Schedule II Pt. I, for "assurances".
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Section 71
Title: Power to Write off Irrecoverable Amount
State: Karnataka
Year: 1966
1 [71. Power to write off irrecoverableamount A market committee may write off any amount (other than market fee) whatsoever due to it, whether under a contract or otherwise, or any amount payable in connection therewith if in its opinion such amount is irrecoverable: Provided that the market committee shall before writing off any such amount, obtain the sanction of,- (i) the Director of Agricultural Marketing, if the amount exceeds five hundred rupees but does not exceed five thousand rupees; (ii) the State Government, if the amount exceeds five thousand rupees;] _______________ 1. Substituted by Act 16 of 1991 w.e.f.1.8.1991
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 218
Title: Public Servant Framing Incorrect Record or Writing with Intent to Save Person from Punishment or Property from Forfeiture
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever, being a public servant, and being as such public servant, charged with the preparation of any record or other writing, frames that record or writing in a manner which he knows to be incorrect, with intent to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, loss or injury to the public or to any person, or with intent thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any properly from forfeiture or other charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Khadi and Village Industries Act, 1960, (Maharashtra) Section 26B
Title: Power of Board to Write off Losses
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1960
.....losses upto two hundred rupees in an individual case, but not exceeding two thousand rupees, in the aggregate in any financial year. (2) On any loss being written off, the Board shall send to the State Government detailed report thereof, together with a report on the action taken (if any) against any person or persons, responsible for the loss : Provided that, cases involving losses not exceeding two hundred rupees need not be reported to the State Govern ment, unless in the opinion of the Board there are important features connected with such losses, which required proper investigation and consideration.] _________________ 1. Section 26B was inserted by Mah. 28 of 1965, section 33.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, (Maharashtra) Section 73
Title: Orders Under Parts Iii, V, Vi and Vii to Be Passed After Investigation in Writing
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1874
.....investigation for the completion of the register. Such details as may not be forthcoming shall be obtained by such further investigation as the Collector may deem necessary. ______________ 1. As to local repeal of part of section 73, see Bom. 6 of 1887. 2. The words "of this Act" were repealed by the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1886 (Bom. 3 of 1886), Sch. B. This Schedule has been printed as an Appendix to the Bombay General Clauses, 1904 (Bom. 1 of 1904). 3. The words "Provincial Government" were substituted for the words "Governor in Council" by the Adaptation of Indian Laws Order in Council. 4. This word was substituted for the word " Provincial" by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. 5. These words were repealed by the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1886 (Bom. 3 of 1886), and re-inserted by the Amending Act, 1895 (16 of 1895). 6. The word "thereof" was repealed by the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1886 (Bom. 3 of 1886), Schedule B. This Schedule has been printed as an Appendix to the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 (Bom. 1 of 1904).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 161
Title: Right of Adverse Party as to Writing Used to Refresh Memory
State: Central
Year: 1872
1 [161. Right of adverse party as to writing used to refresh memory Any writing referred to under the provisions of the two last preceding sections must be produced and shown to the adverse party if he requires it; such party may, if he pleases, cross-examine the witness thereupon. _______________________ 1. As the application of section 161 to Police-Diaries, see the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974), section 172.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial