Bare Act Search Results

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Schedule 1

Title: The First Schedule (Chapter Xi to Xix)

State: Central

Year: 1973

..... Any Magistrate. 484 Counterfeiting a property mark used by a public servant, or any mark used by him to denote the manufacture, quality, etc., of any property. Imprisonment for 3 years and fine. Non-cognizable Bailable Magistrate of the first class. 485 Fraudulently marking or having possession of any die, plate or other instrument for counterfeiting any public or private property mark. Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both. Non-cognizable Bailable Magistrate of the first class. 486 Knowingly selling goods marked with a counterfeit property mark. Imprisonment for 1 year, or fine, or both. Non-cognizable Bailable Any Magistrate. 487 Fraudulently marking a false mark upon any package or receptacle containing goods, with intent to cause it to be believed that it contains goods which it does not contain, etc. Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both. Non-cognizable Bailable Any Magistrate. 488 Making use of any.....

Indian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 3

Title: The Incidents of Easements

State: Central

Year: 1882

.....of his mill. He cannot thereby increase his right to divert water. (b) A has acquired an easement to pollute a stream by carrying on a manufacture on its banks by which a certain quantity of foul matter is discharged into it. A extends his works and thereby increases the quantity discharged. He is responsible to the lower riparian owners for injury done by such increase. (c) A as the owner of a farm, has a right to lake for the purpose of manuring his farm: leaves which have fallen from the trees on B's land. A buys a field and unites it to his farm. A is not thereby entitled to take leaves to manure this fields. Section 30 - Partition of dominant heritage Where a dominant heritage is divided between two or more persons, the easement becomes annexed to each of the shares, but not so as to increase substantially the burden on the servient heritage: Provided that such annexation is consistent with the terms of the instrument, decree or revenue proceeding (if any) under which the division was made, and in the case of prescriptive rights, with the user during the prescriptive period. Illustrations (a) A house to which a right of way by a particular path is annexed.....

Indian Easements Act, 1882 Section 24

Title: Right to Do Acts to Secure Enjoyment

State: Central

Year: 1882

.....detriment to the dominant owner, to cause the servient owner as little inconvenience as possible; and the dominant owner must repair, as far as practicable, the damage (if any) caused by the act to the servient heritage. Accessory rights.--Rights to do acts necessary to secure the full enjoyment of an easement are called accessory rights. Illustrations (a) A has an easement to lay pipes in B's land to convey water to A's cistern. A may enter and dig the land in order to mend the pipes, but he must restore the surface to its original state. (b) A has an easement of a drain through B's land. The sewer with which the drain communicates is altered. A may enter upon B's land and after the drain, to adapt it to the new sewer, provided that he does not thereby impose any additional burden on B's land. (c) A as owner of a certain house, has a right of way over B's land. The way is out of repair, or a tree is blown it own and falls across it. A may enter on B's land and repair the way or remove the tree from it. (d) A as owner of a certain field, has a right of way over B's land. B renders the way impassable A may deviate from the way and pass over the adjoining land to B.....

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Chapter 17

Title: Of Offences Against Property

State: Central

Year: 1860

.....a reasonable time to enable the owner to claim it. What are reasonable means or what is a reasonable time in such a case, is a question of fact. It is not necessary that the finder should know who is the owner of the property, or that any particular person is the owner of it; it is sufficient if, al the time of appropriating it, he does not believe it to be his own properly, or in good faith believe that the real owner cannot be found. Illustrations (a) A finds a rupee on the high road, not knowing to whom the rupee belongs. A picks up the rupee. Here A has not committed the offence defined in this section. (b) A finds a letter on the road, containing a bank note. From the direction and contents of the letter he learns to whom the note belongs. He appropriates the note. He is guilty of an offence under this section. (c) A finds a cheque payable to bearer. He can form no conjecture as to the person who has lost the cheque. But the name of the person, who has drawn the cheque, appears. A knows that this person can direct him to the person in whose favour the cheque was drawn. A appropriates the cheque without attempting to discover the owner. He is guilty of an.....

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 431

Title: Mischief by Injury to Public Road, Bridge, River or Channel

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which renders or which he knows to be likely to render any public road, bridge, navigable river or navigable channel, natural or artificial, impassable or less safe for travelling or conveying property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.

National Highways Act, 1956 Section 8B

Title: Punishment for Mischief by Injury to National Highway

State: Central

Year: 1956

Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which renders or which he knows to be likely to render any national highway referred to in sub-section (1) of section 8A impassable or less safe for traveling or conveying property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with a fine, or with both.]

Karnataka Highways Act, 1964 Section 19B

Title: Punishment for Mischief by Injury to Highway

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which renders or which he knows to be likely to render any highway referred to in sub-section (1) of section 19A impassable or less safe for travelling or conveying property shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both. Explanation.-- For the purpose of this section, the expression "mischief" shall not include any peaceful demonstration or agitation held by any person or group of persons on any highway urging fulfilment of any legitimate demand. ________________________ 1. Chapter IIIA Inserted by Act 35 of 1998 w.e.f. 23.12.98.

National Highways Act, 1956 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1956

.....revised estimate is not likely to exceed, or does not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs: Provided further that the excess of expenditure is caused only by routine factors such as increase in the cost of labour or material and not due to revision in the scope or enlargement of the work or specifications already approved. (4) Where the expenditure upon any original work on a national highway is likely at any time to exceed, or exceeds, the amount of the estimate of the cost for such work no funds shall be allotted to the work by the Central Government in the cases provided for in sub-rule (1), (2) or (3), unless the provisions of those sub-rules are complied with except in cases where the Central Government directs otherwise.Explanation.- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that in cases where the excess of expenditure is less than the percentage or amount specified in sub-rule (1) or sub- rule (2), it is not necessary to obtain technical approval and financial sanction of the Centrali Government for the revised estimate in accordance with those sub-rules only if the excess of expenditure is caused by routine factors such as increase in the cost of labour or material and not due to.....

The Indian Penal Code 1860 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1860

.....Court of Justice (including a liquidator, receiver or Commissioner) whose duty is, as such officer, to investigate or report on any matter of law or fact, or to make, authenticate, or keep any document, or to take charge or dispose of any property or to execute any judicial process, or to a administrator any oath, or to interpret, or to preserve order in the Court, and every person specially authorized by a Court of Justice to perform any of such duties; Fifth--Every juryman, assessor, or member of a Panchayat assisting a Court of Justice or public servant; Sixth--Every arbitrator or other person to whom any cause or matter has been referred for decision or report by any Court of Justice, or by any other competent public authority; Seventh--Every person who holds any office by virtue of which he is empowered to place or keep any person in confinement; Eighth--Every officer of the Government, whose duty it is, as such officer, to prevent offences, to give information of offences, to being offenders to justice, or to protect the public health, safety or convenience; Ninth--Every officer whose duty it is, as such officer, to take, receive, keep or expend any property on behalf of.....

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Complete Act

State: Assam

Year: 1973

.....faith in his aid and under his direction, to make such an examination of the person arrested as is reasonably necessary in order to ascertain the facts which may afford such evidence, and to use such force as is reasonably for that purpose. (2) Whenever the person of a female is to be examined under this section, the examination shall be made only by, or under the supervision of, a female registered medical practitioner. Explanation.-In this section and in section 54, "registered medical practitioner" means a medical practitioner who possesses any recognized medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a State Medical Register. 54. Examination of arrested person by medical practitioner at the request of the arrested person. When a person who is arrested, whether on a charge or otherwise alleges, at the time when he is produced before a Magistrate or at any time during the period of his detention in custody that the examination of his body will afford evidence which will disprove the commission by him of any offence or which will establish the commission by any other.....