Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: high Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 57 results (0.009 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialUttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1962 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1962
.....Court on the date immediately preceding the date of commencement of this section shall be heard and disposed of as if this section had not been enacted.] SECTION 05: ABOLITION OF APPEALS FROM THE JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF ONE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT MADE IN THE EXERCISE OF WRIT JURISDICTION IN CERTAIN OTHER CASES (1) No appeal, arising from an application or proceeding instituted or commenced, whether prior or subsequent to the commencement of this section, shall lie to the High Court from a judgment or order of one Judge of the High Court, made in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution, in respect of a judgment or order made or purported to be made in the exercise or purported exercise of appellate or revisory jurisdiction by a District Judge, Additional District Judge, Civil Judge or Additional Civil Judge under any Uttar Pradesh Act (including any Central Act as amended by an Uttar Pradesh Act) anything to the contrary contained in clause 10 of the Letters Patent of Her Majesty, dated March 17, 1866, read: with clauses 7 and 17 of the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, or in any other law notwithstanding. (2).....
List Judgments citing this sectionState of Nagaland Act, 1962 Part IV
Title: High Court
State: Central
Year: 1962
.....Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura. Section 14 - Provisions as to Advocates (1) As from the appointed day, (a) in the Advocates Act, 1961, in section 3, in sub-section (1), for clause (b), the following clause shall be substituted, namely : "(b) for the States of Assam and Nagaland and the Union Territory of Manipur, to be known as the Bar Council of Assam and Nagaland;"; (b) the Bar Council of Assam shall be deemed to be the Bar Council of Assam and Nagaland. (2) Any person who immediately before the appointed day is an advocate entitled to practise in the High Court of Assam shall be entitled to practise as an advocate in the common High Court. (3) All persons who immediately before the appointed day are advocates on the roll of the Bar Council of Assam shall as from that day become advocates on the roll of the Bar Council of Assam and Nagaland. (4) The right of audience in the common High Court shall be regulated in accordance with the like principles as, immediately before the appointed day, are in force with respect to the right of audience in the High Court of Assam; Provided that as between the Advocate-General of Assam and the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState of Nagaland Act, 1962 Section 13
Title: Common High Court for Assam and Nagaland
State: Central
Year: 1962
(1) As from the appointed day,- (a) there shall be a common High Court for the State of Assam and the State of Nagaland to be called the High Court of Assam and Nagaland1(hereinafter referred to as the common High Court); (b) the Judges of the High Court of Assam holding office immediately before that day shall, unless they have elected otherwise, become on that day the Judges of the common High Court. (2) Expenditure in respect of the salaries and allowances of the Judges of the common High Court shall be allocated between the Stale of Assam and the State of Nagaland in such proportion as the President may by order determine. ________________________ 1. A new High Court called the Gauhati High Court has been created which is a Common High Court for the States of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCustoms Act, 1962 Section 130A
Title: Application to High Court
State: Central
Year: 1962
.....which an application for reference has been made and such memorandum shall be disposed of by the High Court as if it were an application presented within the time specified in subsection (1). 2[(3A) The High Court may admit an application or permit the filing of a memorandum of cross-objections after the expiry of the relevant period referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (3), if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the same within that period." (4) If, on an application made under subsection (1), the High Court directs the Appellate Tribunal to refer the question of law raised in the application, the Appellate Tribunal shall, within one hundred and twenty days of the receipt of such direction, draw up a statement of the case and refer it to the High Court.] _________________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 27 of 1999, w.e.f 11.05.1999. 2. Inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009, w.e.f. 1st July, 1999.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 Section 12
Title: Power of High Court to Make Rules
State: Central
Year: 1962
The High Court may, from time to time, make rules, consistent with this Act, to provide for all or any of the following matters, namely: (a) the translation of any papers filed in the High Court and the preparation of paper-books for hearing all appeals and the copying, typing or printing of any such papers or translation and the recovery from the persons at whose instance or on whose behalf papers are filed of the expenses thereby incurred. (b) the court-fees payable for instituting proceedings in the High Court, the fees to be charged for processes issued by the High Court or by any officer of the court and the amount payable in any proceeding in the High Court in respect of fees of the advocate of any party to such proceedings; (c) the procedure to be followed in the High Court; (d) the approval, admission, enrolment, removal and suspension of advocates from Pondicherry.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCustoms Act, 1962 Section 130
Title: Statement of Case to High Court
State: Central
Year: 1962
.....file, within forty five days of the receipt of the notice, a memorandum of cross objections verified in such manner as may be specified by rules made in this behalf against any part of the order in relation to which an application for reference has been made and such memorandum shall be disposed of by the Appellate Tribunal as if it were an application presented within the time specified in subsection (1). 3[(2A) The High Court may admit an appeal after the expiry of the period of one hundred and eighty days referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (2), if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the same within that period.] (3) If, on an application made under subsection (1), the Appellate Tribunal refuses to state the case of the ground that no question of law arises, the 1[Commissioner of Customs], or, as the case may be, the other party may, within six months from the date on which he is served with notice of such refusal, apply to the High Court and the High Court may, if it is not satisfied with the correctness of the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, require the Appellate Tribunal to state the case and to refer it, and on receipt of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 Section 10
Title: Jurisdiction of High Court
State: Central
Year: 1962
.....former French Establishments pending immediately before the appointed day before the Cour de Cassation or the Cour Superieur d' Arbitrage or the Counseil d' Etat of France and all original proceedings in relation to those Establishments pending immediately before the appointed day before the Counseil d' Etat shall, by virtue of this Act, stand transferred to the High Court and shall be disposed of by the High Court in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred on it by this Act, as if such appeals and other proceedings had been filed before the High Court. Explanation.-All appeals and other proceedings filed before the appointed day but not transmitted to the Cour de Cassation or the Cour Superieur d' Arbitrage or the Counseil d' Etat shall be deemed to be appeals or proceedings, as the case may be, pending before the court for the purposes of this sub-section. ________________________ 1. Substituted for 'Madras' by Madras State (Alteration of Name) A.L.O; 1970 (G.S.R. 112 of 1970).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCustoms Act, 1962 Section 130C
Title: Case Before High Court to Be Heard by Not Less Than Two Judges
State: Central
Year: 1962
(1) When any case has been referred to the High Court 1[under section 130, or section 130A] it shall be heard by a bench of not less than two judges of the High Court and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such judges or of the majority, if any of such judges. (2) Where there is no such majority, the judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then be heard upon that point only one or more of the other judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the judges who have heard the case including those who first heard it. ___________________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 27 of 1999, w.e.f. 11.05.1999 for the words : - "under section 130"
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 Section 11
Title: Advocates Entitled to Practice Before High Court
State: Central
Year: 1962
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Advocates Act, 1961, but subject to such rules as may be framed by the High Court, any person who is entitled to practice before the Tribunal Superieur d' Appeal at Pondicherry shall be recognised as an advocate entitled to practice in the High Court in relation to cases coming before the High Court from Pondicherry.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 Section 44
Title: Appeal to the High Court
State: Karnataka
Year: 1962
The Board or any person aggrieved by a decision of the Tribunal may within three months from the date of the decision, or such further time as the High Court may for sufficient cause allow, appeal to the High Court and the High Court shall pass such orders on the appeal as it thinks fit.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial