Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: final judgment ruleGOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 5
Title: Appeals to Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Judicial Commissioner's Court
State: Central
Year: 1964
Subject to any rules made under Article 145 or any other law as to the time within which appeals to the Supreme Court are to be entered, an appeal shall lie to that Court from a judgment, decree or final order of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, under the provisions of Article 132 or Article 133, or from a judgment, final order or sentence of such Court under the provisions of Article 134: PROVIDED that an appeal may be preferred within ninety days from the date of passing of this Act from a judgment, decree, final order or sentence passed or made by the Judicial Commissioners Court before that date.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionJudicial Commissioners Courts (Declaration as High Courts) Act, 1950[Repealed] Section 5
Title: Appeals to Lie to the Supreme Court from Judgment, Decree, Etc., Whether Passed or Made Before or After the Commencement of the Act
State: Central
Year: 1950
Subject to any rules made under Article 145 or any other law as to the time within which appeals to the Supreme Court are to be altered, an appeal shall lie to that Court from a judgment, decree or final order of a Judicial Commissioners Court, under the provisions of Article 132 or Article 133, or from a judgment, final order or sentence of such Court under the provisions of Article 134 whether such judgment, decree, final order or sentence, as the case may be, was passed or made before or after the commencement of this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionGOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 7
Title: Appeals to lie to the Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Tribunal de Relacao
State: Central
Year: 1964
Any person aggrieved- (a) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made before the 20th December, 1961, against which an appeal would lie to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law but could not be preferred by reason of Goa, Daman and Diu becoming part of the territory of India, or against which an appeal having been preferred to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law had not been disposed of before the said date; or (b) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made on or after the 20th December, 1961, may, within ninety days from the date of passing of this Act, prefer an appeal from such judgment, decree, order or sentence to the Supreme Court as if such judgment, decree, order or sentence had been passed or made by the Judicial Commissioner's Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMulki Rules Act, 1972 Section 3
Title: Limitation, During a Specified Period, of Application of Mulki Rules to Appointments to Certain Posts and Validation of Other Appointments
State: Central
Year: 1972
.....area, which carries a scale of pay the minimum of which does not exceed three hundred rupees per mensem or a fixed pay not exceeding that amount; (d) appointment for the filing of the second vacancy (hereafter in this section and in section 4 referred to as reversed vacancy) in every unit of three vacancies which are to be filled by direct recruitment in non-gazetted posts in the Secretariat Departments and the offices of the Heads of Departments of the State Government situated in the Capital area. (3) Notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court, tribunal or other authority, no appointment of any person made during the period referred to in sub-section (1) to a post other than a post referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) or to a vacancy other than a reserved vacancy in a post referred to in clause (d) of that sub-section and no action taken or thing done by or before such person shall be deemed to be illegal or void or ever to have become illegal or void merely on the ground that such appointment was not made in accordance with the Mulki Rules.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 20
Title: Judgement and Decree
State: Central
Year: 1908
..... 1. Substituted by Act 66 of 1956, section 14, for rule 1. (w.e.f. 1-1-1957). 2. The provisions of rules 1, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable to the Chief Court of Oudh; see the Oudh Court Act, 1925 (U.P. 4 of 1925), section 16 (2). 3. Rule 1 renumbered as sub-rule (1) of that rule by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and substituted by Act 22 of 2002, section 13 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 4. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 5. Certain words omitted by Act 46 of 1999, section 28 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 6. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for "A Judge may" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 7. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for "names and description of the parties" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 8. Rules 6A and 6B inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and substituted by Act 46 of 1999, section 28 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 9. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 10. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 70, for clause (b) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 10
Title: Written Statement, Set-off and Counter-claim
State: Central
Year: 1908
..... (a) produced for the cross-examination of the plaintiffs witnesses, or (b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.] 2. New facts must be specially pleaded The defendant must raise by his pleading all matters which show the suit not to be maintainable, or that the transaction is either void or voidable in point of law, and all such grounds of defence as, if not raised, would be likely to take the opposite party by surprise, or would raise issues of fact not arising out of the plaint, as, for instance, fraud, limitation, release, payment, performance, or facts showing illegality. 3. Denial to be specific It shall not be sufficient for a defendant in his written statement to deny generally the grounds alleged by the plaintiff, but the defendant must deal specifically with each allegation of fact of which he does not admit the truth, except damages. 4. Evasive denial Where a defendant denies an allegation of fact in the plaint, he must not do so evasively, but answer the point of substance. Thus, if it is alleged that he received a certain sum of money, it shall not be sufficient to deny that he received that particular amount, but he must deny.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 30 to 34
Title: Judgment in Appeal
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....Court decides in favour of X. It has power to pass a decree against Y. 34. Dissent to be recorded Where the appeal is heard by more judges than one, any judge dissenting from the judgment of the Court shall state in writing the decision or order which he thinks should be passed on the appeal, and he may state his reasons for the same. __________________________ 1. Rule 30 re-numbered as sub-rule (1) of that rule by Act 104 of 1976, section 87(xv) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 2. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 87(xv), (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 2a. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 87(xvi), (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 3. Inserted by Act 9 of 1922, section 4 which under section 1(2) thereof, may be brought into force in any State by the State Government on any specified date. The Act has been brought into force in Bombay, Bengal, U.P., Punjab, Bihar, C.P. Assam, Orissa, and Tamil Nadu.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 41
Title: Relevancy of Certain Judgments in Probate, Etc., Jurisdiction
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....came into operation; that any legal character, to which it declares any such person to be entitled, accrued, to that person at the time when such judgment, 1 [order or decree] declares it to have accrued to that person; that any legal character which it takes away from any such person ceased at the time from which such judgment, 1 [order or decree] declared that it had ceased or should cease; and that anything to which it declares any person to be so entitled was the property of that person at the time from which such judgment, 1 [order or decree] declares that it had been or should be his property. ________________ 1. Inserted by Act 18 of 1872, section 3.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionGOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 4
Title: Appeals to the Supreme Court not to be barred on account of judgment, etc., being of a single Judge
State: Central
Year: 1964
An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court under the provisions of Article 133 from any judgment, decree or final order of the Judicial Commissioner's Court notwithstanding that such judgment, decree or final order is that of a single Judge.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionJudicial Commissioners Courts (Declaration as High Courts) Act, 1950[Repealed] Section 4
Title: Appeals to the Supreme Court Not to Be Barred on Ground of Judgment, Etc., Being of a Single Judge
State: Central
Year: 1950
An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court under the provisions of Article 133 from any judgment, decree or final order of a Judicial Commissioner's Court notwithstanding that such judgment, decree or final order is that of a single Judge.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial