Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: extinguishment Year: 1882 Page 1 of about 26 results ( seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialIndian Trusts Act, 1882 Section 77
Title: Trust How Extinguished
State: Central
Year: 1882
A trust is extinguished-- (a) when its purpose is completely fulfilled; or (b) when its purpose becomes unlawful; or (c) when the fulfilment of its purpose becomes impossible by destruction of the trust-property or otherwise; or (d) when the trust, being revocable, is expressly revoked.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 5
Title: The Extinction, Suspension and Revival of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....to B, and lawfully imposes an easement on the land in favour of C in accordance with the provisions of section 10. The land is sold to D in satisfaction of the mortgage-debt. The easement is not thereby extinguished. Section 38 - Extinction by release An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or impliedly, to the servient owner. Such release can be made only in the circumstances and to the extent in and to which the dominant owner can alienate the dominant heritage. An easement may be released as to part only of the servient heritage. Explanation I.--An easement is impliedly released-- (a) where the dominant owner expressly authorises an act of a permanent nature to be done on the servient heritage, the necessary consequence of which is to prevent his future enjoyment of the easement, and such act is done in pursuance of such authority; (b) where any permanent alteration is made in the dominant heritage of such a nature as to show that the dominant owner intended to cease to enjoy the easement in future. Explanation II.--Mere non-user of an easement is not an implied release within the meaning of this section. Illustrations .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Easements Act, 1882 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....appears, be deemed to pass the easement to the person in whose favour the transfer or devolution takes place. SECTION 20: RULES CONTROLLED BY CONTRACT OR TITLE The rules contained in this Chapter are controlled by any contract between the dominant and servient owners relating to the servient heritage, and by the provisions of the instrument or decree, if any, by which the easement referred to was imposed. Incidents of customary easements and when any incident of any customary easement is inconsistent with such rules, nothing in this Chapter shall affect such incident. SECTION 21: BAR TO USE UNCONNECTED WITH ENJOYMENT An easement must not be used for any purpose not connected with the enjoyment of the dominant heritage. SECTION 22: EXERCISE OF EASEMENT -- CONFINEMENT OF EXERCISE OF Easement The dominant owner must exercise his right in the mode which is least onerous to the servient owner; and when the exercise of an easement can without detriment to the dominant owner be confined to a determinate part of the servient heritage, such exercise shall, at the request of the servient owner, be so confined. SECTION 23: RIGHT TO ALTER MODE OF ENJOYMENT Subject to the provisions of.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 46
Title: Extinction by Unity of Ownership
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....mortgages his field to C. Then C forecloses both mortgages and becomes thereby absolute owner of both house and field. The right of way is extinguished. (b) The dominant owner acquires only pan of the servient heritage; the easement is not extinguished, except in the ease illustrated in section 41. (c) The servient owner acquires the dominant heritage in connection with a person; the easement is not extinguished. (d) The separate owners of two separate dominant heritages jointly acquire the heritage which is servient to the two, separate heritages; the easements are not extinguished. (e) The joint owners of the dominant heritage jointly acquire the servient heritage; the easement is extinguished. (f) A single right of way exists over two servient heritages for the beneficial enjoyment of a single dominant heritage. The dominant owner acquires only one of the servient heritages. The easement is not extinguished. (g) A has a right of way over B's road. B dedicates the road to the public A's right of ways is not extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 47
Title: Extinction by Non-enjoyment
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....or that a right accessory thereto was enjoyed, or that dominant owner was not aware of its existence, or that he enjoyed it in ignorance of his right to do so, does not prevent its extinction under this section. An easement is not extinguished under this section-- (a) where the cessation is in pursuance of a contract between the dominant and servient owners; (b) where the dominant heritage is held in co-ownership, and one of the co-owners enjoys the easement within the said period; or (c) where the easement is a necessary easement. Where several heritages are respectively subject to rights of way for the benefit of a single heritage, and the ways are continuous, such rights shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be a single easement. Illustration A has, as annexed to his house, rights of way from the high road thither over the heritages X and Z and the intervening heritage Y. Before the twenty years expire, A exercises his right of way over X. His rights of way over V and Z are not extinguished. ______________________ 1. See now the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 37
Title: Extinction by Dissolution of Right of Servient Owner
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....and openly as an easement without interruption for twenty-nine years, B's interest in Sultanpur then ends, and with it C's easement. (c) A and B, tenants of C, have permanent transferable interests in their respective holdings. A imposes on his holding an easement to draw water from a tank for the purpose of irrigating B's land. B enjoys the easement for twenty years. Then A's rent falls into arrear and his interest is sold. B's easement is extinguished. (d) A mortgages Sultanpur to B, and lawfully imposes an easement on the land in favour of C in accordance with the provisions of section 10. The land is sold to D in satisfaction of the mortgage-debt. The easement is not thereby extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 48
Title: Extinction of Accessory Right
State: Central
Year: 1882
When an easement is extinguished, the rights (if any) accessory thereto are also extinguished. Illustration A has an easement to draw water from B's well. As accessory thereto, he has a right of way over B's land to and from the well. The easement to draw water is extinguished under section 47. The right of way is also extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 51
Title: Revival of Easement
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....the destroyed heritage is a dominant building and before twenty years have expired such building is rebuilt upon the same site and in such a manner as not to impose a greater burden on the servient heritage. An easement extinguished under section 46 revives when the grant or bequest by which the unity of ownership was produced is set aside by the decree of a competent court. A necessary easement extinguished under the same section revives when the unity of ownership ceases from any other cause. A suspended easement revives if the cause of suspension is removed before the right is extinguished under section 47. Illustration A, as the absolute owner of field Y, has right of way thither over B's field Z, A obtains from B a lease of Z for twenty years. The easement is suspended so long as A remains lessee of Z. But when A assigns the lease to C, or surrenders it to B, the right of way revives.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 44
Title: Extinctionon Permanent Alteration of Servient Heritage by Superior Force
State: Central
Year: 1882
An easement is extinguished where the servient heritage is by superior force so permanently altered that the dominant owner can no longer enjoy such easement: Provided that, where a way of necessity is destroyed by superior force, the dominant owner has a right to another way over the servient heritage; and the provisions of section 14 apply to such way. Illustrations (a) A grants to B, as the owner of a certain house, a right to fish in a river running through A's land. The river changes its course permanently and runs through C's land. B's easement is extinguished. (b) Access to a path over which A has a right of way is permanently cut off by an earthquake. A's right is extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 50
Title: Servient Owner Not Entitled to Require Continuance
State: Central
Year: 1882
The servient owner has no right to require that an easement be continued; and, notwithstanding the provisions of section 26, he is not entitled to compensation for damage caused to the servient heritage in consequence of the extinguishment or suspension of the easement, if the dominant owner has given to the servient owner such notice as will enable him, without unreasonable expense, to protect the servient heritage from such damage. Compensation for damage caused by extinguishment or suspension.--Where such notice has not been given, the servient owner is entitled to compensation for damage caused to the servient heritage in consequence of such extinguishment or suspension. Illustration A, in exercise of an easement, diverts to his canal the water of B's stream. The diversion continues for many years, and during that time the bed of the stream partly fills up. A then abandons his easement, and restores the stream to its ancient course. B's land is consequently flooded. B sues A for compensation for the damage caused by the flooding. It is proved that A gave B a month's notice of his intention to abandon the easement, and that such notice was sufficient to enable B,.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial