Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: dominant heritage Page 1 of about 242 results (0.006 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialHampi World Heritage Area Management Authority Act, 2002 Complete Act
Title: Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority Act, 2002
State: Karnataka
Year: 2002
.....16 - Levy of Fee Section 17 - Authority fund Section 18 - Budget Section 19 - Annual report Section 20 - Subventions and loans to the Authority Section 21 - Power of Authority to borrow Section 22 - Accounts and audit Chapter V Section 23 - Directions by the Authority Section 24 - Penalty for breach of the provisions of the Act Section 25 - Offences by companies Section 26 - Sanction of Prosecution Section 27 - Authority may compromise claims by or against it Section 28 - Fines realised to be credited to the Fund Section 29 - Members and officers to be public servants Section 30 - Protection of action taken in good faith Section 31 - Control by the State Government etc Section 32 - Act to over-ride other laws Section 33 - Power to make rules Section 34 - Regulations Section 35 - Removal of difficulties Section 36 - Amendment of Karnataka Town and Country Planning act, 1961 Section 37 - Application of (Karnataka Act 32 of 1974) to Authority Premises Schedule I - SCHEDULE
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Easements Act, 1882 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....appears, be deemed to pass the easement to the person in whose favour the transfer or devolution takes place. SECTION 20: RULES CONTROLLED BY CONTRACT OR TITLE The rules contained in this Chapter are controlled by any contract between the dominant and servient owners relating to the servient heritage, and by the provisions of the instrument or decree, if any, by which the easement referred to was imposed. Incidents of customary easements and when any incident of any customary easement is inconsistent with such rules, nothing in this Chapter shall affect such incident. SECTION 21: BAR TO USE UNCONNECTED WITH ENJOYMENT An easement must not be used for any purpose not connected with the enjoyment of the dominant heritage. SECTION 22: EXERCISE OF EASEMENT -- CONFINEMENT OF EXERCISE OF Easement The dominant owner must exercise his right in the mode which is least onerous to the servient owner; and when the exercise of an easement can without detriment to the dominant owner be confined to a determinate part of the servient heritage, such exercise shall, at the request of the servient owner, be so confined. SECTION 23: RIGHT TO ALTER MODE OF ENJOYMENT Subject to the provisions of.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 3
Title: The Incidents of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....of his mill. He cannot thereby increase his right to divert water. (b) A has acquired an easement to pollute a stream by carrying on a manufacture on its banks by which a certain quantity of foul matter is discharged into it. A extends his works and thereby increases the quantity discharged. He is responsible to the lower riparian owners for injury done by such increase. (c) A as the owner of a farm, has a right to lake for the purpose of manuring his farm: leaves which have fallen from the trees on B's land. A buys a field and unites it to his farm. A is not thereby entitled to take leaves to manure this fields. Section 30 - Partition of dominant heritage Where a dominant heritage is divided between two or more persons, the easement becomes annexed to each of the shares, but not so as to increase substantially the burden on the servient heritage: Provided that such annexation is consistent with the terms of the instrument, decree or revenue proceeding (if any) under which the division was made, and in the case of prescriptive rights, with the user during the prescriptive period. Illustrations (a) A house to which a right of way by a particular path is annexed.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 29
Title: Increaseof Easement
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....diminished. Save as aforesaid, no easement is effected by any change in the extent of the dominant or the servient heritage. Illustrations (a) A, the owner of a mill, has acquired a prescriptive right, to divert to his mill part of the water of a stream. A alters the machinery of his mill. He cannot thereby increase his right to divert water. (b) A has acquired an easement to pollute a stream by carrying on a manufacture on its banks by which a certain quantity of foul matter is discharged into it. A extends his works and thereby increases the quantity discharged. He is responsible to the lower riparian owners for injury done by such increase. (c) A as the owner of a farm, has a right to lake for the purpose of manuring his farm: leaves which have fallen from the trees on B's land. A buys a field and unites it to his farm. A is not thereby entitled to take leaves to manure this fields.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 5
Title: The Extinction, Suspension and Revival of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....to B, and lawfully imposes an easement on the land in favour of C in accordance with the provisions of section 10. The land is sold to D in satisfaction of the mortgage-debt. The easement is not thereby extinguished. Section 38 - Extinction by release An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or impliedly, to the servient owner. Such release can be made only in the circumstances and to the extent in and to which the dominant owner can alienate the dominant heritage. An easement may be released as to part only of the servient heritage. Explanation I.--An easement is impliedly released-- (a) where the dominant owner expressly authorises an act of a permanent nature to be done on the servient heritage, the necessary consequence of which is to prevent his future enjoyment of the easement, and such act is done in pursuance of such authority; (b) where any permanent alteration is made in the dominant heritage of such a nature as to show that the dominant owner intended to cease to enjoy the easement in future. Explanation II.--Mere non-user of an easement is not an implied release within the meaning of this section. Illustrations .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 46
Title: Extinction by Unity of Ownership
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....mortgages his field to C. Then C forecloses both mortgages and becomes thereby absolute owner of both house and field. The right of way is extinguished. (b) The dominant owner acquires only pan of the servient heritage; the easement is not extinguished, except in the ease illustrated in section 41. (c) The servient owner acquires the dominant heritage in connection with a person; the easement is not extinguished. (d) The separate owners of two separate dominant heritages jointly acquire the heritage which is servient to the two, separate heritages; the easements are not extinguished. (e) The joint owners of the dominant heritage jointly acquire the servient heritage; the easement is extinguished. (f) A single right of way exists over two servient heritages for the beneficial enjoyment of a single dominant heritage. The dominant owner acquires only one of the servient heritages. The easement is not extinguished. (g) A has a right of way over B's road. B dedicates the road to the public A's right of ways is not extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 43
Title: Extinction by Permanent Change in Dominant Heritage
State: Central
Year: 1882
Where, by, any permanent change in the dominant heritage, the burden on the servient heritage is materially increased and cannot be reduced by the servient owner without interfering with the lawful enjoyment Of the easement, the easement is extinguished unless-- (a) it was intended for the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, to whatever extent the easement should be used; or (b) the injury caused to the servient owner by the change is so slight that no reasonable person would complain of it; or (c) the easement is an easement of necessity. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to an easement entitling the dominant owner to support of the dominant heritage.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 30
Title: Partition of Dominant Heritage
State: Central
Year: 1882
Where a dominant heritage is divided between two or more persons, the easement becomes annexed to each of the shares, but not so as to increase substantially the burden on the servient heritage: Provided that such annexation is consistent with the terms of the instrument, decree or revenue proceeding (if any) under which the division was made, and in the case of prescriptive rights, with the user during the prescriptive period. Illustrations (a) A house to which a right of way by a particular path is annexed is divided into two parts, one of which is granted to A, the other to B. Each is entitled, in respect of his part, to a right of way by tie same path. (b) A house to which is annexed the right of drawing water from a well to the extent of fifty buckets a day is divided into two distinct heritages, one of which is granted to A, the other to B. A and B are each entitled, in respect of his heritage, to draw from the well fifty buckets a day: but the amount drawn by both must not exceed fifty buckets a day. (c) A, having in respect of his house an easement of light, divides the house into three district heritages. Each of these continues to have the right to have its wind
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 19
Title: Transfer of Dominant Heritage Passes Easement
State: Central
Year: 1882
Where the dominant heritage is transferred or devolves, by act of parties or by operation of law, the transfer or devolution shall, unless a contrary intention appears, be deemed to pass the easement to the person in whose favour the transfer or devolution takes place. Illustration A has certain land to which a right of way is annexed. A lets the land to B for twenty years. The right of way vests in B and his legal representatives so long as the lease continues.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 2
Title: The Imposition, Acquisition and Transfer of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....sale took effect. A is entitled to the light, and B cannot build on the land so as to obstruct such light. (g) A the owner of a house, sells IS a factor)' built on adjoining land, B is entitled, as against A, to pollute the air, when necessary, with smoke and vapours from the factory. (h) A, the owner of two adjoining houses, Y and Z, sells Y to B, and retains Z. B is entitled to the benefit of all gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Y as it was enjoyed when the sale took effect, and A is entitled to the benefit of all the gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Z as it was enjoyed when the sale look effect. (i) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B, retaining the other. B is entitled to a right to lateral support from A's building, and A is entitled to a right to lateral support from B's building. (j) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B and the other to C. C is entitled to lateral support from B's building, and B is entitled to lateral support from C's building. (k) A grants lands to ti for the purpose of building a house thereon. B is entitled to such amount of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial