Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: does or dools Page 1 of about 6,224 results (0.011 seconds)

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Section 14

Title: Orders Where Party Concerned Does Not Carry on Business in India

State: Central

Year: 1969

JURISDICTION, POWERS AND PROCEDURE OF THE CORPORATION 14. Orders where party concerned does not carry on business in India.- Where any practice substantially falls within 1 [monopolistic, restrictive or unfair, trade practice, relating to the production, storage, supply,] distribution or control of goods of any description or the provision of any services and any party to such practice does not carry on business in India, an order may be made under this Act with respect to that part of the practices which is carried on in India. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 30 of 1984, section 12 for certain words w.e.f. 1-8-1984.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 138

Title: Release of One Co- Surety Does Not Discharge Others

State: Central

Year: 1872

Where there are co-sureties, a release by the creditor of one of them does not discharge the others; neither does it free the surety so released from his responsibility to the other sureties.1 _______________________ 1. See section 44, supra.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 137

Title: Creditors Forbearance to Sue Does Not Discharge Surety

State: Central

Year: 1872

Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the principal debtor or to enforce any other remedy against him, does not, in the absence of any provision in the guarantee to the contrary, discharge the surety. Illustration B owes to C a debt guaranteed by A. The debt becomes payable. C does not sue B for a year after the debt has become payable. A is not discharged from his suretyship.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 110

Title: Punishment of Abetment if Person Abetted Does Act with Different Intention from That of Abettor

State: Central

Year: 1860

Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been commuted if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 161

Title: When Removal of Thing Bequeathed Does Not Constitute Ademption

State: Central

Year: 1925

The removal of the thing bequeathed from the place in which it is stated in the will to be situated does not constitute an ademption, where the place is only referred to in order to complete the description of what the testator meant to bequeath. Illustrations A bequeaths to B "all the bills, bonds and other securities for money belonging to me now lying in my lodgings in Calcutta". At the time of his death these effects had been removed from his lodgings in Calcutta. (ii) A bequeaths to B all his furniture then in his house in Calcutta. The testator has a house at Calcutta and another at Chinsurah, in which he lives alternately, being possessed of one set of furniture only which he removes with himself to each house. At the time of his death the furniture is in the house at Chinsurah. (iii) A bequeaths to B all his goods on board a certain ship then lying in the river Hughli. The goods are removed by A's directions to a warehouse, in which they remain at the time of A's death. No one of these legacies is revoked by ademption.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 158

Title: Ademption where stock, specifically bequeathed, does not exist at testator's death

State: Central

Year: 1925

Where stock which has been specifically bequeathed does not exist at the testator's death, the legacy is adeemed. Illustration A bequeaths to B "my capital stock of 1,000l. in East India Stock": "my promissory notes of the Central Government for 10,000 rupees in their 4 per cent. loan". A sells the stock and the notes. The legacies are adeemed.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 110

Title: Bequest to A for benefit of B does not lapse by A's death

State: Central

Year: 1925

Where a bequest is made to one person, for the benefit of another, the legacy does not lapse by the death, in the testator's lifetime, of the person to whom the bequest is made.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 125

Title: Gift to Several of Whom One Does Not Accept

State: Central

Year: 1882

A gift of a thing to two or more donees, of whom one does not accept it, is void as to the interest which he would have taken had he accepted.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 31

Title: Condition That Transfer Shall Cease to Have Effect in Case Specified Uncertain Event Happens or Does Not Happen

State: Central

Year: 1882

Subject to the provisions of section 12, on a transfer of property an interest therein may be created with the condition superadded that it shall cease to exist in case a specified uncertain event shall happen, or in case a specified uncertain event shall not happen. Illustrations (a) A transfers a farm to B for his life, with a proviso that, in case B cuts down a certain wood, the transfer shall cease to have any effect. B cuts down the wood. He loses his life-interest in the farm. (b) A transfers a farm to B, provided that, if B shall not go to England within three years after the date of the transfer, his interest in the farm shall cease. B does not go to England within the term prescribed. His interest in the farm ceases.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 44

Title: Execution of Decrees Passed by Revenue Courts in Places to Which This Code Does Not Extend

State: Central

Year: 1908

1 [44. Execution of decrees passed by revenue courts in places to which this Code does not extend, The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that the decrees of any Revenue Court in any part of India to which the provisions of this Code do not extend, or any class of such decrees, may be executed in the State as if they had been passed by Courts in that State.] __________________ 1. Substituted by Act 2 of 1951, section 9, for section 44 (w.e.f. 1-4-1951)

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //