Bare Act Search Results

Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 Preamble 1

Title: Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

THE KARNATAKA OPEN PLACES (PREVENTION OF DISFIGUREMENT) ACT, 1981 [ACT No. 35 OF 1982] [28th August, 1982] PREAMBLE An Act to prevent disfigurement, by unauthorised advertisements of places open to public view in the State of Karnataka. WHEREAS it is expedient to prevent disfigurement, by unauthorised advertisements of places open to public view in the State of Karnataka. BE it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the Thirty--second year of the Republic of India as follows:--

Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 Complete Act

Title: Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

Preamble 1 - KARNATAKA OPEN PLACES (PREVENTION OF DISFIGUREMENT) ACT, 1981 Section 1 - Short title and commencement Section 2 - Definitions Section 3 - Penalty for unauthorised disfigurement by advertisement Section 4 - Burden of proof in certain cases Section 5 - Punishment for abettors Section 6 - Offences by companies Section 7 - Indemnity Section 8 - Cognizance of Offences Section 9 - Other laws not affected Section 10 - Power to make rules Section 11 - Repeal and savings

The Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 Complete Act

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1959

.....Act 8 of 1994) [(dd) "State Transport Undertaking" means a State Transport Undertaking as defined in clause (42) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988)] (Inserted by Tamil Nadu Act 39 of 1986) (e) "Traffic Committee" means a Traffic Committee constituted under Section 3-B and having jurisdiction. 3. Penalty for disfigurement by objectionable advertisements. " Whoever affixes to, or inscribes or exhibits on, any place open to public view any objectionable advertisement of either description for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to ( Substituted by Tamil Nadu Act 55 of 1992 ) [five thousand rupees] or with both. (Inserted by Tamil Nadu Act 39 of 1986) [3 -A . Penalty for disfigurement by certain categories of unauthorised advertisements without permission. " (1) (Ibid) [Subject to the provisions of Section 4-A, and without prejudice to the provisions of section 4,] whoever, without the previous permission of the Traffic Committee, affixes to, or inscribes or exhibits on, any place open to public view any advertisement which " (a) obstructs the line of vision of any person or the driver of any vehicle using.....

Indian Post Office Act, 1898 Section 63

Title: Penalty for Affixing Without Authority Thing To, or Painting, Tarring or Disfiguring, Post Office or Post Office Letter-box

State: Central

Year: 1898

Whoever, without due authority, affixes any placard, advertisement, notice, list, document board or other thing in or on, or paints, tars or in any way disfigures any post office or any letter-box provided by the Post Office for the reception of postal articles, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty rupees.

Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 Section 1

Title: Short Title and Commencement

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

(1) This Act may be called the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981. (2) It shall,-- (i) be deemed to have come into force in the cities of Bangalore, Mysore, Hubli--Dharwar, Mangalore and Belgaum constituted or continued under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 or under any other law, on the fifth day of May 1981; and (ii) come into force in the municipalities, notified areas, sanitary boards, constituted or continued under the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 or under any other law, or in any other local area, on such date, as the State Government may by notification, appoint and different dates may be appointed in respect of different areas.

Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 Section 3

Title: Penalty for Unauthorised Disfigurement by Advertisement

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

.....therein or to any sale, entertainment or meeting to be held on or upon or in the same; or (iii) relates to the name of the land or building, upon or over which the advertisement is exhibited, or to name of the owner or occupier of such land or building ; or (iv) relates to the business of a railway administration and is exhibited within any railway station or upon any wall or other property of a railway administration. 1[(v) is affixed to or exhibited on any ancient and historical monument declared to be of national importance under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 ( Central Act XXIV of 1958).]1 ______________________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 15 of 1984 w.e.f. 18.9.1982

Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 Section 11

Title: Repeal and Savings

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

(1) The Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Ordinance, 1981 ( Karnataka Ordinance 10 of 1981) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act.

The Indian Penal Code 1860 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1860

.....1908, `India', means the territory of India excluding the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Under s. 2(e) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, `India' means for the purposes of this Act the territories to which this Act extends (i.e., whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir). According to s. 2(27) of Customs Act, 1962, `India' includes the territorial waters of India. SECTION 19: "JUDGE" The word "judge" denotes not only every person who is officially designated as a Judge, but also every person, who is empowered by law to give, in any legal proceeding, civil or criminal, a definitive judgement or a judgement which, if not appealed against, would be definitive, or a judgement which, if confirmed by some other authority, would be definitive, or who is one of a body of persons, which body of persons is empowered by law to give such a judgement. Illustrations (a) A Collector exercising jurisdiction in a suit under Act 10 of 1859, is a Judge. (b) A Magistrate exercising jurisdiction in respect of a charge on which he has power to sentence to fine or imprisonment, with or without appeal, is a Judge. (c) A member of a Panchayat which has power.....

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2013

.....of an offence punishable under section 376B of the Indian Penal Code where the persons are in a marital relationship, except upon prima facie satisfaction of the facts which constitute the offence upon a complaint having been filed or made by the wife against the husband." 20. In section 273 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before the Explanation, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:- "Provided that where the evidence of a woman below the age of eighteen years who is alleged to have been subjected to rape or any other sexual offence, is to be recorded, the court may take appropriate measures to ensure that such woman is not confronted by the accused while at the same time ensuring the right of cross-examination of the accused." 21. In section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:- "(1) In every inquiry or trial the proceedings shall be continued from day-to-day until all the witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless the Court finds the adjournment of the same beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded: Provided that when the inquiry or trial.....

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2013 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2013

.....punishable under Section 376-B of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) where the persons are in a marital relationship, except upon prima facie satisfaction of the facts which constitute the offence upon a complaint having been filed or made by the wife against the husband.". 20. Amendment of Section 273." In Section 273 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before the Explanation , the following proviso shall be inserted, namely" "Provided that where the evidence of a woman below the age of eighteen years who is alleged to have been subjected to rape or any other sexual offence, is to be recorded, the court may take appropriate measures to ensure that such woman is not confronted by the accused while at the same time ensuring the right of cross-examination of the accused.". 21. Amendment of Section 309." In Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (45 of 1860), for sub-section ( 1 ), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely" "( 1 ) In every inquiry or trial the proceedings shall be continued from day-to-day until all the witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless the Court finds the adjournment of the same beyond the following day to be necessary.....