Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: direct Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.008 seconds)

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Act, 2006 Section 11

Title: Amendment of Section 14

State: Central

Year: 2006

Section 14 of the principal Act shall be renumbered as sub-section (1) thereof, and after sub-section (1) as so renumbered, the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-- "(2) The Chief Judicial Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall review the pendency of cases of the Board at every six months, and shall direct the Board to increase the frequency of its sittings or may cause the constitution of additional Boards.".

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 230

Title: Employment of Government Agencies for Repair, Etc.

State: Central

Year: 2006

The Central Government may, for reason to be recorded, direct that any specified work, repair, renewal or replacement which is to be undertaken by or for the Board under this Chapter, shall be carried out on behalf of the Board by the Central Government and the Board shall pay the charges therefor at the rates and subject to the terms for the time being applicable in the case of works constructed by that Government on behalf of a local authority.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 248

Title: Power to Stop Erection or Re-erection or to Demolish

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....Board. (2) A Board shall by notice in writing direct the owner, lessee or occupier of any land in the cantonment to stop the erection or re-erection of a building in any case in which the order under section 238 sanctioning the erection or re-erection has been suspended by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 58, and shall in any such case in like manner direct the demolition or alteration, as the case may be, of the building or any part thereof so erected or re-erected where the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, thereafter directs that the order of the Board sanctioning the erection or re-erection of the building shall not be carried into effect or shall be carried into effect with modifications specified by him: Provided that the Board shall pay to the owner of the building compensation for any loss actually incurred by him in consequence of the demolition or alteration of any building which has been erected or re-erected prior to the date on which the order of the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, has been communicated to him.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 247

Title: Illegal Erection of Re-erection

State: Central

Year: 2006

Whoever begins, continues or completes the erection or re-erection of a building-- (a) without having given a valid notice as required by sections 235 and 236, or before the building has been sanctioned or is deemed to have been sanctioned; or (b) without complying with any direction made under sub-section (1) of section 238; or (c) when sanction has been refused, or has ceased to be available or has been suspended by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 58, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees and the cost of sealing the illegal construction and its demolition.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 241

Title: Compensation

State: Central

Year: 2006

(1) No compensation shall be claimable by any person for any damage or loss which he may sustain in consequence of the refusal of the Board of sanction to the erection of any building or in respect of any direction issued by it under sub-section (1) of section 238. (2) The Board shall make compensation to the owner of any building for any actual damage or loss sustained by him in consequence of the prohibition of the re-erection of any building or of its requiring any land belonging to him to be added to the street: Provided that the Board shall not be liable to make any compensation in respect of the prohibition of the re-erection of any building which for a period of three years or more immediately preceding such refusal has not been in existence or has been unfit for human habitation,

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 339

Title: Order of Stoppage of Lbuilding or Works in Certain Cases and Disposal of Things Removed

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....any provision of this Act or bye-laws made thereunder, the Chief Executive Officer may in addition to any other action that may be taken under this Act, by order require the person at whose instance the building or the work has been commenced or is being carried on to stop the same forthwith. (2) If an order made by the Chief Executive Officer under sub-section (1) directing any person to stop the erection of any building or execution of any work is not complied with, the Chief Executive Officer may require any police officer to remove such person and all his assistants and workmen from the premises or to seize any construction material, tool, machinery, scaffolding or other things used in the erection of any building or execution of any work within such time as may be specified in the requisition and such police officer shall comply with the requisition accordingly. (3) Any of the things caused or to be seized by the Chief Executive Officer under sub-section (2) shall be disposed of by him in a manner specified in sub-sections (6) and (7). (4) After the requisition under sub-section (2) has been complied with the Chief Executive Officer may, if he thinks fit, depute by a.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 238

Title: Power of Board to Sanction or Refuse

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....If the Board decides to refuse to sanction the erection or re-erection of the building, it shall communicate in writing the reasons for such refusal to the person by whom notice was given. (6) Where the Board neglects or omits, for one month after the receipt of a valid notice, to make and to deliver to the person who has given the notice any order of any nature specified in this section, and such person thereafter by a written communication sent by registered post to the Board calls the attention of the Board to the neglect or omission, then, if such neglect or omission continues for a further period of fifteen days from the date of such communication the Board shall be deemed to have given sanction to the erection or re-erection, as the case may be: Provided that, in any case to which the provisions of sub-section (3) apply, the period of one month herein specified shall be reckoned from the date on which the Board has received the report referred to in that sub-section.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Chapter X

Title: Town Planning and Control over Buildings, Etc.

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....of, the building, or which reduces the cubic capacity of any room in the building below the minimum prescribed by any bye-law made under this Act. Section 236 - Conditions of valid notice (1) A person giving the notice required by section 235 shall specify the purpose for which it is intended to use the building to which such notice relates. (2) No notice shall be valid until the information required under the sub-section (1) and any further information and plans and undertakings which may be required under bye-laws made under this Act have been furnished to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer, along with the notice. Section 237 - Power of Board under certain sections exercisable by Chief Executive Officer The powers, duties and functions of the Board under section 238, sub-section (1) of section 241, section 243, section 245 and section 248 excluding the provisions to subsection (1) and the provisions to sub-section (2) of the said section 248 shall be exercised or discharged in a civil area by the Chief Executive Officer. Section 238 - Power of Board to sanction or refuse (1) The Board may either refuse to sanction the erection or re-erection,.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 228

Title: Power to Examine and Test Drains Etc., Believed to Be Defective

State: Central

Year: 2006

(1) Where it appears to the Chief Executive Officer that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a private drain or cesspool is in such condition as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance or that a private drain communicating directly or indirectly with a cantonment drain is so defective as to admit sub-soil water, he may examine its condition, and for that purpose may apply any test, other than a test by water under pressure, and if he deems it necessary, open the ground. (2) If on examination the drain or cesspool is found to be in proper condition, the Chief Executive Officer shall, as soon as possible, re-instate any ground which has been opened by him and make good any damage done by him.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 264

Title: Improper Use of Land

State: Central

Year: 2006

(1) If, in the opinion of the Chief Executive Officer, the working of a quarry in the cantonment, or the removal of stone, earth or other material from the soil in any place in the cantonment, is dangerous to persons residing in or frequenting the neighbourhood or such quarry or place, or creates, or is likely to create, a nuisance, the Chief Executive Officer may, by notice in writing, prohibit the owner, lessee or occupier of such quarry or place or the person responsible for such working or removal, from continuing or permitting the working of such quarry or the moving of such material, or require him to take such steps in the matter as he may direct for the purpose of preventing danger or abating the nuisance arising or likely to arise therefrom. (2) If, in any case referred to in sub-section (1), the Chief Executive Officer is of opinion that such a course is necessary in order to prevent imminent danger, he may, by order in writing, require a proper hoarding or fence to be put up for the protection of passers-by.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //