Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: crap out Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 63 results (0.006 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialIndian Succession Act, 1925 Section 151
Title: Order of Payment when Legacy Directed to Be Paid out of Fund the Subject of Specific Legacy
State: Central
Year: 1925
Where a portion of a fund is specifically bequeathed and a legacy is directed to be paid out of the same fund, the portion specifically bequeathed shall first be paid to the legatee, and the demonstrative legacy shall be paid out of the residue of the fund and, so far as the residue shall be deficient, out of the general assets of the testator. Illustration A bequeaths to B 1,000 rupees, being part of a debt due to him from W. He also bequeaths to C 1,000 rupees to be paid out of the debt due to him from W. The debt due to A from W is only 1,500 rupees; of these 1,500 rupees, 1,000 rupees belong to B, and 500 rupees are to be paid to C. C is also to receive 500 rupees out of the general assets of the testator.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Section 174
Title: Period of Vesting Where Will Directs That Annuity Be Provided out of Proceeds of Property, or out of Property Generally, or Where Money Bequeathed to Be Invested in Purchase of Annuity
State: Central
Year: 1925
Where the Will directs that an annuity shall be provided for any person out of the proceeds of property, or out of property generally, or where money is bequeathed to be invested in the purchase of any annuity for any person, on the testator's death, the legacy vests in interest in the legatee, and he is entitled at his option to have an annuity purchased for him or to receive the money appropriated for that purpose by the Will. Illustrations (i) A by his Will directs that his executors shall, out of his property, purchase an annuity of 1,000 rupees for B. B is entitled at his option to have an annuity of 1,000 rupees for his life purchased for him or to receive such a sum as Will be sufficient for the purchase of such an annuity. (ii) A bequeaths a fund to B for his life, and directs that after B's death, it shall be laid out in the purchase of an annuity for C. B and C survive the testator. C dies in B's lifetime. On B's death the fund belongs to the representative of C.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Part 6
Title: Testamentary Succession
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....of ministers of religion; for the formation or support of a public garden; All these bequests are void. _____________________ 1. Added by Act 51 of 1991, section 6. INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925Chapter 8 - OF THE VESTING OF LEGACIES Section 119 - Date of vesting of legacy when payment or possession postponed Where by the terms of a bequest the legatee is not entitled to immediate possession of the thing bequeathed, a right to receive it at the proper time shall, unless a contrary intention appears by the will, become vested in the legatee on the testator's death, and shall pass to the legatee's representatives if he dies before that time and without having received the legacy, and in such cases the legacy is from the testator's death said to be vested in interest. Explanation.An intention that a legacy to any person shall not become vested in interest in him is not to be inferred merely from a provision whereby the payment or possession of the thing bequeathed is postponed, or whereby a prior interest therein is bequeathed to some other person, or whereby the income arising from the fund bequeathed is directed to be accumulated until the time of payment arrives,.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSuccession Act, 1925 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....under this section or exempted from the operation of any of the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1865(10 of 1865), under section 332 of that Act are in this Act referred to as "exempted persons". PART 02 OF DOMICILE SECTION 04: APPLICATION OF PART This Part shall not apply if the deceased was a Hindu, Muhammadan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jaina. SECTION 05: LAW REGULATING SUCCESSION TO DECEASED PERSON'S IMMOVABLE AND MOVABLE PROPERTY, RESPECTIVELY (1) Succession to the immovable property in India of a person deceased shall be regulated by the law of India, wherever such person may have had his domicile at the time of his death. (2) Succession to the movable property of a person deceased is regulated by the law of the country in which such person had his domicile at the time of his death. SECTION 06: ONE DOMICILE ONLY AFFECTS SUCCESSION TO MOVABLES A person can have only one domicile for the purpose of the succession to his movable property. SECTION 07: DOMICILE OF ORIGIN OF PERSON OF LEGITIMATE BIRTH The domicile of origin of every person of legitimate birth is in the country in which at the time of his birth his father was domiciled; or, if he is a posthumous.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Chapter 15
Title: Of Demonstrative Legacies
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....of Ramnagar". (iii) A bequeaths to B "10,000 rupees out of my estate at Ramnagar", or charges it on his estate at Ramnagar: "10,000 rupees, being my share of the capital embarked in a certain business". Each of these bequests is demonstrative. Section 151 - Order of payment when legacy directed to be paid out of fund the subject of specific legacy Where a portion of a fund is specifically bequeathed and a legacy is directed to be paid out of the same fund, the portion specifically bequeathed shall first be paid to the legatee, and the demonstrative legacy shall be paid out of the residue of the fund and, so far as the residue shall be deficient, out of the general assets of the testator. Illustration A bequeaths to B 1,000 rupees, being part of a debt due to him from W. He also bequeaths to C 1,000 rupees to be paid out of the debt due to him from W. The debt due to A from W is only 1,500 rupees; of these 1,500 rupees, 1,000 rupees belong to B, and 500 rupees are to be paid to C. C is also to receive 500 rupees out of the general assets of the testator.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Part 9
Title: Probate, Letters of Administration and Administration of Assets of Deceased
State: Central
Year: 1925
..... (viii) The person to whom probate was, or letters of administration were, granted has subsequently become of unsound mind. INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925Chapter 4 - OF THE PRACTICE IN GRANTING AND REVOKING PROBATES AND LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION Section 264 - Jurisdiction of District Judge in granting and revoking probates, etc. (1) The District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of administration in all cases within his district. (2) Except in cases to which section 57 applies, no court in any local area beyond the limits of the towns of Calcutta, Madras and Bombay,1[***] shall, where the deceased is a Hindu, Muhammadan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jaina or an exempted person, receive applications for probate or letters of administration until the State Government has, by a notification in the Official Gazette, authorised it so to do. ______________________ 1. The words "and the province of Burma" omitted by the A.O. 1937. Section 264 - Jurisdiction of District Judge in granting and revoking probates, etc. (1) The District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of administration in all cases.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Section 150
Title: Demonstrative Legacy Defined
State: Central
Year: 1925
..... Illustrations (i) A bequeaths to B 1,000 rupees, being part of a debt due to him from W. He also bequeaths to C 1,000 rupees to be paid out of the debt due to him from W. The legacy to B is specific, the legacy to C is demonstrative. (ii) A bequeaths to B "ten bushels of the corn which shall grow in my field of Green Acre": "80 chests of the indigo which shall be made at my factory of Rampur": "10,000 rupees out of my five per cent. promissory notes of the Central Government": an annuity of 500 rupees "from my funded property": "1,000 rupees out of the sum of 2,000 rupees due to me by C": an annuity, and directs it to be paid "out of the rents arising from my taluq of Ramnagar". (iii) A bequeaths to B "10,000 rupees out of my estate at Ramnagar", or charges it on his estate at Ramnagar: "10,000 rupees, being my share of the capital embarked in a certain business". Each of these bequests is demonstrative.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Chapter 16
Title: Of Ademption of Legacies
State: Central
Year: 1925
..... "the debt which C owes me": "2,000 rupees which I have in the hands of D": "the money due to me on the bond of E": "my mortgage on the Rampur factory". All these debts are extinguished in A's lifetime, some with and some without his consent. All the legacies are adeemed. (ii) A bequeaths to B his interest in certain policies of life assurance. A in his lifetime receives the amount of the policies. The legacy is adeemed. Section 155 - Ademption pro tanto by testator's receipt of part of entire thing specifically bequeathed The receipt by the testator of a part of an entire thing specifically bequeathed shall operate as an ademption of the legacy to the extent of the sum so received, Illustration A bequeaths to B "the debt due to me by C'. The debt amounts to 10,000 rupees. C pays to A 5,000 rupees the one-half of the debt. The legacy is revoked by ademption, so far as regards the 5,000 rupees received by A. Section 156 - Ademption pro tanto by testator's receipt of portion of entire fund of which portion has been specifically bequeathed If a portion of an entire fund or stock is specifically bequeathed, the receipt by the testator of a portion of the fund or.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Chapter 20
Title: Of Bequests of Annuities
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....his life purchased for him or to receive such a sum as Will be sufficient for the purchase of such an annuity. (ii) A bequeaths a fund to B for his life, and directs that after B's death, it shall be laid out in the purchase of an annuity for C. B and C survive the testator. C dies in B's lifetime. On B's death the fund belongs to the representative of C. Section 175 - Abatement of annuity Where an annuity is bequeathed, but the assets of the testator are not sufficient to pay all the legacies given by the Will, the annuity shall abate in the same proportion as the other pecuniary legacies given by the Will. Section 176 - Where gift of annuity and residuary gift, whole annuity to be first satisfied Where there is a gift of an annuity and a residuary gift, the whole of the annuity is to be satisfied before any part of the residue of paid to the residuary legatee, and, if necessary, the capital of the testator's estate shall be applied for that purpose.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCarriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....(b) fire. unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier: (c) perils, dangers and accidents of the sea or other navigable waters: (d) act of God; (e) act of war; (f) act of public enemies: (g) arrest or restraint of princes, rulers of people, or seizure under legal process; (h) quarantine restriction; (i) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods, his agent, or representative; (j) strikes or lock-outs or stoppage or restraint of labour from whatever cause, whether partial or general; (k) riots and civil commotions; (1) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea; (m) wastage in bulk or weight or any other loss or damage arising from inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods; (n) insufficiency of packing; (o) insufficiency or inadequacy of marks; (p) latent defects not discoverable by due diligence; (q) any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor the fault or neglect of the.....
List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial