Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: conspiratorial

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 [Repealed] Chapter V

Title: Interception of Communication in Certain Cases

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....identity of the investigating officer making the application, and the head of the department authorising the application; (b) a statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that an order should be issued, including- (i) details as to the offence of terrorist act that has been, is being, or is about to be committed; (ii) a particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; (iii) a particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; and (iv) the identity of the person, if known, committing the terrorist act whose communications are to be intercepted; (c) a statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained, if the nature of the enquiry is such that the authorisation of interception should not automatically terminate after the described type of communication has been first obtained; (d) a particular description of facts establishing probable cause to believe that additional communications of the same type will occur thereafter; and (e) where the application is for the.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 [Repealed] Section 43

Title: Interception of Communication in Emergency

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....in accordance with the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 38 within forty-eight hours after the interception has occurred, or begins to occur. (2) In the absence of an order approving the interception made under sub-section (1), such interception shall immediately terminate when the communication sought is obtained or when the application for the order is rejected, whichever is earlier; and in the event of an application for permitting interception being rejected under sub-section (1) of section 39 or an application under sub-section (1) of this section for approval being rejected, or in any other case where the interception is terminated without an order having been issued, the contents of any wire, elcetronic or oral communication intercepted shall be treated as having been obtained in violation of this section.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Control of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 14

Title: Authorization of Interception of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communication

State: Karnataka

Year: 2000

.....investigating or law enforcement officer making the application and the head of the department authorizing the application; (b) A statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant, to justify his belief that an order should be issued including- (i) Details as to the offence of organized crime that has been, is being or is about to be committed; (ii) A particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; (iii) A particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; and (iv) The identity of the person, if known, committing the offence of organized crime and whose communications is to be intercepted; (c) A statement as to whether or not other modes of enquiry or intelligence gathering have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous or is likely to expose the identity of those connected with the operation of interception; (d) A statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained, if the nature of the enquiry is such that the authorization.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....50) , a Special Court may take cognizance of any offence, without the accused being committed to it for trial, upon receiving a complaint of facts that constitute such offence or upon a police report of such facts. (2) Where an offence triable by a Special Court is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or with fine or with both, the Special Court may, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of (section 260) or (section 262) of the Code, try the offence in a summary way in accordance with the procedure prescribed, in the Code and the provisions of (sections 263) to (S.265 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) of the Code, shall so far as may be, apply to such trial: Provided that when, in the course of a summary trial under this sub-section, it appears to the Special Court that the nature of the case is such that it is undesirable to try it in a summary way, the Special Court shall recall any witnesses who may have been examined and proceed to re-hear the case in the manner provided by the provisions of the Code for the trial of such offence and the said provisions shall apply to and in relation to a Special Court as they.....

List Judgments citing this section

Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1999

.....of a member of an organised crime syndicate is, or, at any time has. been, in possession of movable or immovable property which he cannot satisfactorily account for, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine, subject to a minimum fine of rupees one lac and such property shall also be liable for attachment and forfeiture, as provided by section 20. SECTION 05: SPECIAL COURTS (1) The State Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, constitute one or more Special Courts for such area or areas, or for such case or class or group of cases, as may be specified in the notification. (2) Where any question arises as to the jurisdiction of any Special Court, it shall be referred to the State Government whose decision shall be final. (3) A Special Court shall be presided over by a judge to be appointed by the State Government, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court. The State Government may also appoint, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, additional judges to exercise jurisdiction in a Special.....

List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //