Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: consequential loss

India (Consequential Provision) Act, 1949 [Repealed] Preamble 1

Title: India (Consequential Provision) Act, 1949

State: Central

Year: 1949

INDIA (CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISION) ACT, 1949 [Act, No. 12 of 1949] [16th December, 1949] PREAMBLE An Act to make provision as to the operation of the law in relation to India, and persons and things in any way belonging to or connected with India, in view of India's becoming a Republic while remaining a member of the Commonwealth. WHEREAS on the twenty-sixth day of January, nineteen hundred and fifty, India is to become a Republic while remaining a member of Commonwealth. BE it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: -

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

India (Consequential Provision) Act, 1949 [Repealed] Complete Act

Title: India (Consequential Provision) Act, 1949 [Repealed]

State: Central

Year: 1949

Preamble1 - INDIA (CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISION) ACT, 1949 Section1 - Operation of existing law in relation to India in view of India's becoming a Republic Section2 - Short title Repealing Act1 - BRITISH STATUTES (REPEAL) ACT, 2004

List Judgments citing this section

Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act, 1981 Preamble 1

Title: Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act, 1981

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

THE PREVENTION OF DESTRUCTION AND LOSS OF PROPERTY ACT, 1981 [Act, No. 47 of 1981] [29th September, 1981] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for punishment of certain acts in respect of property and imposition of collective fine to recover the loss or damage sustained by such acts. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for punishment of certain acts in respect of property and imposition of collective fine to recover the loss or damage sustained by such acts; BE it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the Thirty--second Year of the Republic of India as follows:--

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act, 1981 Complete Act

Title: Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act, 1981

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

Preamble 1 - PREVENTION OF DESTRUCTION AND LOSS OF PROPERTY ACT, 1981 Section 1 - Short title and commencement Section 2 - Punishment for committing mischief in respect of property Section 3 - Special provision regarding bail Section 4 - Power of State Government to impose collective fine Section 5 - Power to make rules Section 6 - Repeal and savings

List Judgments citing this section

Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1958

.....in 1867, 1882andagain in 1893and 1896 but all these attempts failed owing to legal and constitutional difficulties.Two of the principal contributory factors were the then limited powers of the Indian Legislature to legislate regarding shipping and the fact that part of the British Statute law on the subject, including parts of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, which is the principal United-Kingdom enactment on the subject, applied to Indian and any Indian enactment had to be in legal harmony with that law. A fresh attempt was made in 1921-22 to codify the Indian law on merchant shipping by the Statute Law Revision Committee, which decided that only consolidation, and not revision should be attempted immediately. The result was the Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1923, which is now on the Statute Book and which consolidated some 21 existing Indian Acts on the subject. This Act has also been amended from time to time, the two major amendments being those made in 1933 and in 1953 so as to take power to implement the provisions of the international conventions with respect to load lines, 1930, and with respect to safety of life at sea, 1948, respectively, which have been ratified by.....

List Judgments citing this section

Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993 Chapter 3

Title: Responsibilities and Liabilities of the Multimodal Transport Operator

State: Central

Year: 1993

.....greater than the liability for total loss of goods for which a person will be entitled to make a claim against him under the provisions of this Act. Section 20 - Notice of loss of or damage to goods (1) The delivery of the consignment to the consignee by the multimodal transport operator shall be treated as prima facie evidence of delivery of the goods as described in the multimodal transport document unless notice of the general nature of loss of, or damage to, the goods is given, in writing, by the consignee to the multimodal transport operator at the time of handing over of the goods to the consignee. (2) Where the loss or damage is not apparent, the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply unless notice in writing is given by the consignee of the loss of, or damage to, the goods within six consecutive days after the day when the goods were handed over to the consignee. 1[Period of responsibility "20A. The responsibility of the multimodal transport operator for the goods under this Act shall cover the period from the time he has taken the goods in his charge to the time of their delivery.] ___________________ 1. Inserted by The Multimodal Transportation Of.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1993

.....OF THE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT DOCUMENT Save as provided in section 10, (a) the multimodal transport document shall be prima facie evidence of the fact that the multimodal transport operator has taken charge of the goods as described in the document; and (b) no proof to the contrary by the multimodal transport operator shall be admissible if the multimodal transport document is issued in negotiable form and has been transmitted to the consignee or transferred by the consignee to a third party, if the consignee or the third party has acted in good faith relying on the description of the goods in the document. SECTION 12: RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONSIGNOR (1) The consignor shall be deemed to have guaranteed to the multimodal transport operator the adequacy and accuracy, at the time the multimodal transport operator takes charge of the goods, of the particulars referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of section 9as furnished by the consignor for insertion in the multimodal transport document. (2) The consignor shall indemnify the multimodal transport operator against loss resulting from inadequacy or inaccuracy of the particulars referred to in sub-section (1). (3) The right of the.....

List Judgments citing this section

Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993 Section 13

Title: Basis of Liability of Multimodal Transport Operator

State: Central

Year: 1993

.....by a diligent multimodal transport operator, having regard to the circumstances of the case, to effect the delivery of the consignment. (2) If the consignment has not been delivered within ninety consecutive days following the date of delivery expressly agreed upon or the reasonable time referred to in the Explanation to sub-section (1), the claimant may treat the consignment as lost. ____________________ 1. Substituted by The Multimodal Transportation Of Goods (Amendment) Act, 2000 (Act No. 44 of 2000) w.e.f. 05.12.2000. Prior to substitution it read as under : "Provided further that the multimodal transport operator shall not be liable for loss or damage arising out of delay in delivery unless the consignor had made a declaration of interest in timely delivery which has been accepted by the multimodal transport operator."

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Insurance Rules, 1939 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1939

.....[or a Fellow of Actuarial Society of India]: Provided that where application is made to the Controller of Insurance and it Is shown to his satisfaction that the employment of an Associate of such institute of actuaries or of such Faculty of Actuaries 33. Ins. by S.O. 961 (E), dated 24th March. 1992. [or of such Actuarial Society] or of any other person having actuarial knowledge for any specified purpose is expedient in order to enable an Insurer or a provident society to carry out any of his or its obligations under the Act, the Controller of Insurance may grant the application and permit such person to sign as actuary for the specified purpose, subject to such conditions and restric- tions as the Controller of Insurance thinks fit to impose. Rule 4 . . [* * * * * * * CHAPTER 3 Deposits with the Bank Rule 5 Deposits with the Bank (1) Deposits made in pursuance of the Act shall be held by that office of the Bank (hereinafter referred to as the appropriate Indian office) in whose area of administration the principal office in the State of the depositor is situated : Provided that deposits in sterling securities shall be held by the London office of the Bank on behalf of.....

List Judgments citing this section

Railways Act, 1989 Chapter 11

Title: Responsibilities of Railway Administrations as Carriers

State: Central

Year: 1989

.....manner as may be prescribed and as a result of such defective or improper packing are liable to damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage, and the fact of such condition or defective or improper packing has been recorded by the consignor or his agent in the forwarding note, the railway administration shall not be responsible for any damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage or for the condition in which such goods are available for delivery at destination: Provided that the railway administration shall be responsible for any such damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage or for the condition in which such goods are available for delivery at destination if negligence or misconduct on the part of the railway administration or of any of its servants is proved. (2) When any goods entrusted to a railway administration for carriage are found on arrival at the destination station to have been damaged or to have suffered deterioration, leakage or wastage, the railway administration shall not be responsible for the damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage of the goods on proof by railway administration.-- (a) that the goods were, at the time of entrustment to the railway.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //