Bare Act Search Results

Ambernath Interim Municipality (Constitution and Actions) Validation Act, 1965, (Maharashtra) Preamble

Title: the Ambernath Interim Municipality (Constitution and Actions) Validation Act, 1965

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1965

THE AMBERNATH INTERIM MUNICIPALITY (CONSTITUTION AND ACTIONS) VALIDATION ACT, 1965 [Act No. 49 of 1965]1 [14th December, 1965] PREAMBLE An Act to validate the constitution of an interim municipality for Ambernath municipal district and to make certain consequential provisions upon conversion of village panchayat into a municipality. WHEREAS, by Government Notification, Local Self-Government and Public Health Department, No. DTM. 2553/A, dated the 6th May, 1959, issued under section 4 of the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 (Bom. III of 1901), the State Government declared the local area specified therein which was within the limits of certain village to be a permanent municipal district with effect from the 11th May, 1959 under the name of the municipal district of Ambernath; AND WHEREAS, relying on section 191-B of the said District Municipal Act as it stood before its amendment by Bombay Act VIII of 1959 (which came into force on the 13th March, 1959), the persons vacating office as members of the village panchayat constituted an interim municipality for the newly created municipal district with effect from the 11th May, 1959, with the Sarpanch and Deputy.....

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 25A

Title: Directorate of Prosecution

State: Central

Year: 1973

.....cases in the High Court shall be subordinate to the Director of Prosecution. (6) Every Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor and Special Public Prosecutor appointed by the State Government under sub-section (3), or as the case may be, sub-section (8), of section 24 to conduct cases in District Courts and every Assistant Public Prosecutor appointed under sub-section (1) of section 25 shall be subordinate to the Deputy Director of Prosecution. (7) The powers and functions of the Director of Prosecution and the Deputy Directors of Prosecution and the areas for which each of the Deputy Directors of Prosecution have been appointed shall be such as the State Government may, by notification, specify. (8) The provisions of this section shall not apply to the Advocate General for the State while performing the functions of a Public Prosecutor.]. ________________________ 1. Inserted by Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005

The Bombay Village Police (Appointments and Disciplinary Action by Subdivisional Magistrates, Validation) Act, 1967 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1967

.....1867, as amended by this Act. And accordingly, notwithstanding anything in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, any such appointment, disciplinary action or order shall be deemed to have been validly made or taken; and any such appointment, disciplinary action or order or anything done by the Police-patels in the exercise of their powers by or under the Bombay Village Police Act, 1867 or any other law for the time being in force shall not be called in question (or if questioned shall not be maintained) in any Court or before any Tribunal or authority merely on the ground that the Magistrate had no power to make the appointment or to take an action, or that the State Government or the Commissioner had no power to interfere in the matter, or had not exercised its or his powers for such interference by or under some other provision of that Act or that the Police-patel was not properly appointed, nor on any ground consequential to the grounds aforesaid. SECTION 04: REPEAL OF MAH. ORD. II OF 1967 The Bombay Village Police (Appointments and Disciplinary Action by Sub-Divisional Magistrates, Validation) Ordinance, 1967, is hereby repealed. Maharashtra State Acts

Companies Act, 2013, Section 245

Title: Class Action

State: Central

Year: 2013

..... (c) to declare a resolution altering the memorandum or articles of the company as void if the resolution was passed by suppression of material facts or obtained by mis-statement to the members or depositors; (d) to restrain the company and its directors from acting on such resolution; (e) to restrain the company from doing an act which is contrary to the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force; (f) to restrain the company from taking action contrary to any resolution passed by the members; (g) to claim damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action from or against-- (i) the company or its directors for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or omission or conduct or any likely act or omission or conduct on its or their part; (ii) the auditor including audit firm of the company for any improper or misleading statement of particulars made in his audit report or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct; or (iii) any expert or advisor or consultant or any other person for any incorrect or misleading statement made to the company or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct or any likely act or.....

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Chapter V

Title: Sanction for Prosecution and Other Miscellaneous Provisions

State: Central

Year: 1988

.....error, omission or irregularity in, the sanction required under sub-section (1), unless in the opinion of that court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby; (b) no court shall stay the proceedings under this Act on the ground of any error, omission or irregularity in the sanction granted by the authority, unless it is satisfied that such error, omission or irregularity has resulted in a failure of justice; (c) no court shall stay the proceedings under this Act on any other ground and no court shall exercise the powers of revision in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any inquiry, trial, appeal or other proceedings. (4) In determining under sub-section (3) whether the absence of, or any error, omission or irregularity in, such sanction has occasioned or resulted in a failure of justice the court shall have regard to the fact whether the objection could and should have been raised at any earlier stage in the proceedings. Explanation. For the purposes of this section, (a) error includes competency of the authority to grant sanction; (b) a sanction required for prosecution includes reference to any requirement that the prosecution shall.....

Police Act, 1861 Section 42

Title: Limitation of Actions

State: Central

Year: 1861

.....of theDistrict in which the act was committed, one month at least before thecommencement of the action. Tender of amends.- No plaintiff shall recover in any such action if tender of sufficient,amend shall have been made before such action brought, or if a sufficient sum ofmoney shall have been paid into Court after such action brought, by or on behalfof the defendant, and, though a decree shall be given for the plaintiff in anysuch action, such plaintiff shall not have costs against the defendant, unlessthe Judge before whom the trial is held shall certify his approbation of theaction: Proviso.- Provided always that no action shall in any case lie where such, officersshall have been prosecuted criminally for the same act.

The Ambernath Interim Municipality (Constitution & Actions) Validation Act, 1965 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1965

.....MUNICIPALITY (CONSTITUTION & ACTIONS) VALIDATION ACT, 1965 THE AMBERNATH INTERIM MUNICIPALITY (CONSTITUTION & ACTIONS) VALIDATION ACT, 1965 (Mah. Act No. XLIX of 1965) [ For Statement of Objects and Reasons see Maharashtra Government Gazette, 1965, Pt. V, Extr. Ord., Pg. 770.] [14th December 1965] An Act to validate the constitution of an interim municipality for Ambernath municipal district and to make certain consequential provisions upon conversion of village panchayat into a municipality. WHEREAS, by Government Notification, Local Self-Government and Public Health Department, No. DTM.2553/A, dated the 6th May, 1959, issued under section 4 of the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 (Bom. III of 1901), the State Government declared the local area specified therein which was within the limits of certain village to be a permanent municipal district with effect from the 11th May, 1959 under the name of the municipal district of Ambernath; AND WHEREAS, relying on section 191-B of the said District Municipal Act as it stood before its amendment by Bombay Act VIII of 1959 (which came into force on the 13th March, 1959) the persons vacating office as.....

Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 Section 1A

Title: Suit for Compensation to the Family of a Person for Loss Occasioned to It by His Death by Actionable Wrong

State: Central

Year: 1855

.....administrator or representative of the person deceased; and in every such action, the court may give such damages as it may think proportioned to the loss resulting from such death to the parties respectively, for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought, and the amount so recovered, after deducting all costs and expenses, including the costs not recovered from the defendant, shall be divided amongst the before-mentioned parties, or any of them, in such shares as the court by its judgment or decree shall direct. _______________________ 1. Original section 1 renumbered as section 1A by Act 3 of 1951, section 3 and Schedule 2. The words "And it is enacted further, that" repealed by Act 10 of 1914, Schedule II.

Special Tax on Entry of Certain Goods Act, 2004 Section 8

Title: Protection of Action in Good Faith

State: Karnataka

Year: 2004

(1) No suit, prosecution or other proceedings shall lie against any officer or servant of the Government for any action taken or purporting to be taken under this Act, without the previous sanction of the Government, and no such suit, prosecution or other proceeding shall be instituted after the expiry of six months from the date of action complained of. (2) No officer or servant of the Government shall be liable in respect of any such action in any Civil or Criminal proceedings, if the action taken was in good faith in the course of execution of duties imposed on him or the discharge of functions entrusted to him by or under this Act.

Bombay Abkari Act, 1878, (Maharashtra) Section 67

Title: Bar of Action

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1878

No action shall lie against Government or against any Abkari-officer for damages in any Civil Court for any act bona fide done or ordered to be done by them in pursuance of this Act, or of any law at the time in force relating to Abkari-revenue; and all prosecutions of any Abkari-officer, and all actions which may be lawfully brought against Government or against any Abkari-officer, in respect of anything done, or alleged to have been done, in pursuance of this Act, shall be instituted within four months from the date of the Act complained of and not afterwards; and any such action shall be dismissed - (a) if the plaintiff does not prove that, previously to bringing such action, he has presented all such appeals allowed by this Act, or by any other law for the time being in force, as within the aforesaid period of four months it was possible to present; or issue of licences, or by forfeitures or by imposition or infliction of fines and penalties under the said Act should be carried; (b) in the case of an action for damages, if tender of sufficient amends shall have been made before the action was brought, or if after the institution of the action a sufficient sum of money.....