Skip to content

Statute → case law

See how courts applied this provision

Jump to judgments under this act, then open an AI Brief on any order. Semantic Search helps you ask in plain English.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

TypeBare Act JurisdictionCentral Government

Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 Section 62

Procedure Where Invalidity of Registration is Pleaded by the Accused

~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/act/41495

Bare act section · Research

About this section

Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 Section 62 is part of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 - Procedure Where Invalidity of Registration is Pleaded by the Accused. Read the section text below and explore Indian court judgments that cite it.

Research copy - verify against official government publications before filing or court use.

Section Text

(1) Where the offence charged under section 56 is in relation to a registered layout-design and the accused pleads that the registration of the layout-design is invalid, the following procedure shall be followed:--

(a) if the court is satisfied that such defence is prima facie tenable, it shall not proceed with the charge but shall adjourn the proceeding for three months from the date on which the plea of accused is recorded to enable the accused to file an application before the Appellate Board under this Act, for the rectification of the register on the ground that the registration is invalid;

(b) if the accused proves to the court that he has made such application within the time so limited or within such further time as the time court may for sufficient cause may allow, the further proceedings in the prosecution shall stand stayed till the disposal of such application for rectification;

(c) if within a period of three months or within such extended time as may be allowed by the court the accused fails to apply to the Appellate Board for rectification of the register, the court shall proceed with the case as if the registration were valid.

(2) Where before the institution of a complaint of an offence referred to in sub-section (1), any application for the rectification of the register concerning the layout-design in question on the ground of invalidity of the registration thereof has already been properly made to and is pending before the Appellate Board or the Registrar, the Court shall stay the further proceedings in the prosecution pending the disposal of the application aforesaid and shall determine the charge against the accused in conformity with the result of the application for rectification in so far as the complainant relies upon the registration of his layout-design.

Frequently asked questions

What does Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 Section 62 provide?

Section Section 62 of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 (Procedure Where Invalidity of Registration is Pleaded by the Accused) is reproduced on this page as part of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000. Lawyers and researchers use it to read the statutory wording before checking how courts have applied this section in reported judgments.

How do I find judgments on Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 Section 62?

Open “Find citing judgments” on this page to search Supreme Court, High Court, and tribunal decisions that reference Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-design Act, 2000 Section 62. Advanced act search can narrow results by court, year, or additional act filters.

Is the section text on SooperKanoon official?

SooperKanoon hosts bare act text for research and quick reference. For filings or compliance in Central, confirm the wording against the official state gazette or authorized publication.

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial