Skip to content

Statute → case law

See how courts applied this provision

Jump to judgments under this act, then open an AI Brief on any order. Semantic Search helps you ask in plain English.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

TypeBare Act JurisdictionCentral Government

Specific Relief Act 1963 Chapter V

Cancellation of Instruments

~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/act/30825

Bare act section · Research

About this section

Specific Relief Act 1963 Chapter V is part of Specific Relief Act 1963 - Cancellation of Instruments. Read the section text below and explore Indian court judgments that cite it.

Research copy - verify against official government publications before filing or court use.

Section Text

(1) Any person against whom a written instrument is void or voidable, and who has reasonable apprehension that such instrument, if left outstanding may cause him serious injury, may sue to have it adjudged void or voidable; and the court may, in its discretion, so adjudge it and order it to be delivered up and cancelled.

(2) If the instrument has been registered under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, the court shall also send a copy of its decree to the officer in whose office the instrument has been so registered; and such officer shall note on the copy of the instrument contained in his books the fact of its cancellation.

Section 32 - What instruments may be partially cancelled

Where an instrument is evidence of different rights or different obligations, the court may, in a proper case, cancel it in part and allow it to stand for the residue.

Section 33 - Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is cancelled or is successfully resisted as being void or voidable

(1) On adjudging the cancellation of an instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted, to restore, so far as may be any benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make anycompensation to him which justice may require.

(2) Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground--

(a) that the instrument sough to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if the defendant hasreceived any benefit under the instrument from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation for it;

(b) that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his not having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the court may, if the defendant has received any benefit under the agreement from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, suchbenefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has benefited thereby.

Frequently asked questions

What does Specific Relief Act 1963 Chapter V provide?

Section Chapter V of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (Cancellation of Instruments) is reproduced on this page as part of the Specific Relief Act 1963. Lawyers and researchers use it to read the statutory wording before checking how courts have applied this section in reported judgments.

How do I find judgments on Specific Relief Act 1963 Chapter V?

Open “Find citing judgments” on this page to search Supreme Court, High Court, and tribunal decisions that reference Specific Relief Act 1963 Chapter V. Advanced act search can narrow results by court, year, or additional act filters.

Is the section text on SooperKanoon official?

SooperKanoon hosts bare act text for research and quick reference. For filings or compliance in Central, confirm the wording against the official state gazette or authorized publication.

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial