Skip to content


P. Prabhakaran Vs. P. Jayarajan - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Election ;Civil

Court

Supreme Court of India

Decided On

Case Number

Civil Appeal Nos. 8213 of 2001 and 6691 of 2002

Judge

Reported in

AIR2005SC688; 2005(79)DRJ305; JT2005(1)SC173; 2005(1)KLT510(SC); (2005)2MLJ27(SC); (2005)1SCC754

Acts

Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71, 143, 148, 149, 302, 303, 307, 323, 325, 326, 353, 427 and 447; Prevention of the Damage of the Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31, 389 and 401; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 8(4), 36(2), 67A, 100, 100(1) and 116A; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 164, 191 and 286(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630

Appellant

P. Prabhakaran;ramesh Singh Dalal

Respondent

P. Jayarajan;nafe Singh and ors.

Advocates:

L. Nageswara Rao,; K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Advs.,; Roy Abraham,

Disposition

Petition dismissed

Cases Referred

K. Prabhakaran v. P. Jayarajan

Prior history

From the Judgment and Order dated 05.10.2001 of the Kerala High Court in E.P. No. 1 of 2001

Books referred

Black's Law Dictionary sixth Edition;

Excerpt:


.....back date if a person consequent upon his conviction for any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years was actually and as a fact disqualified from filing nomination and contesting election on the date of nomination or election - question of qualification or disqualification of a returned candidate within meaning of section 100(1)(a) has to be determined by reference to date of his election - such date is focal point for purpose of determining whether candidate is not qualified or is disqualified for being chosen to fill seat in a house - factum of pendency of an appeal against conviction is irrelevant and inconsequential - election petition filed by appellant allowed and election of respondent set aside - as per minority opinion - in order to incur disqualification, person must have been convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years - merely because magistrate ordered that sentence shall run consecutively, and aggregate period exceeds two years or more, a person convicted would not incur disqualification under section 8(3) - disqualification under section 8(3) held not to be solely dependent on direction as to mode in.....order73. in view of the majority opinion, civil appeal no. 8213 of 2001, k. prabhakaran v. p. jayarajan, : [2002]supp3scr1 is allowed. the judgment of the high court dated 5.10.2001 is set aside. the election petition filed by the appellant is allowed. the election of the respondent p. jayarajan from no. 14 kuthuparamba assembly constituency to the kerala state legislative assembly, which was declared on 13.5.2001, is set aside. the respondent no. 1 shall bear the costs of the appellant throughout.74. civil appeal no. 6691 of 2002 is also allowed. the judgment of the high court dated 5.7.2002 is set aside. the election petition filed by the appellant shall stand allowed. the election of the respondent nafe singh from 37-bahadurgarh assembly constituency is declared void as he was disqualified from being a candidate under section 8(3) of the representation of the people act, 1951. the respondent no. 1 shall bear the costs of the appellant throughout.

Judgment:


ORDER

73. In view of the majority opinion, Civil Appeal No. 8213 of 2001, K. Prabhakaran v. P. Jayarajan, : [2002]SUPP3SCR1 is allowed. The judgment of the High Court dated 5.10.2001 is set aside. The election petition filed by the appellant is allowed. The election of the respondent P. Jayarajan from No. 14 Kuthuparamba Assembly Constituency to the Kerala State Legislative Assembly, which was declared on 13.5.2001, is set aside. The respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of the appellant throughout.

74. Civil Appeal No. 6691 of 2002 is also allowed. The judgment of the High Court dated 5.7.2002 is set aside. The election petition filed by the appellant shall stand allowed. The election of the respondent Nafe Singh from 37-Bahadurgarh Assembly Constituency is declared void as he was disqualified from being a candidate under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of the appellant throughout.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //