Skip to content


Dealership Agreements - Legal Draft

Home Forms View

Category : Agreements Misc Agreements

I.

Preliminary.-

It is the common feature of the manufacturing operations of the industrial

concerns that dealers are appointed to sell the goods so manufactured . it is

because of this that dealership agreements are invariably entered into by the

manufacturing concerns with the other parties so as to demarcate the contours

of relations inter se.II.

Model FormsDealership

Agreement between a ManufacturingCompany

and FirmThis

Agreement Made On Thisday of.between Chandika & Co. Ltd., a

company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered

office at (hereinafter called the company which expression shall, unless

the context admits otherwise, includes its representatives) of the one part and

Jumb & Jumboo, a partnership firm consisting of

Shri..,ShriShri.and Smt..w/o Shripartners,

having its main business place atand branches at.. and

..(hereinafter called the firm which expression shall, unless the context

admits otherwise, include the partners, their heirs, executors, administrators,

representatives and assigns) of the other part.Whereas1.

The

company manufacturers cotton and polyster fibre yarn suitings and shirtings.2.

The

firm has its own well-established marketing network and is selling goods of

various manufactures and is desirous of selling the goods of the company at a

new sales depot recently taken by it on rent for the purpose.3.

The

company, after having considered the proposal of the firm, has agreed to

appoint the firm as its dealer on the terms and conditions as hereinafter

appearing.Now

this Agreement Witnesses as under :1.

That

the company hereby appoints the firm as its dealer for selling its products,

more particularly described in the Schedule annexed hereto.2.

That

the agreement shall remain in force originally for three years commencing

frombut may be renewed for similar periods on the terms and conditions as

may be agreed by and between the parties hereto.3.

That

the firm shall keep a minimum stock ofpieces each of the companys products

described in the Schedule to meet the demand of the ultimate users/consumers,

and such quantity shall be reviewed every quarter in the light of the sales

during the previous quarter the demands, consumers likings and the market

trends.4.

That

the company shall supply to the firm its products on credit for fifteen days

from the date of the invoice and shall charge interest at the rate of.per

cent per annum from the sixteenth day of the invoice till payment in full if

payments are not made within the period credit aforesaid.5.

That

the company shall supply to the firm publicity and advertisement material in

sufficient quantity for display at the firms sales depot and for the

distribution in its area of operation.6.

That

the company shall bear 60% of the cost of maintaining the firms sales depot

including rent thereof subject to a maximum of 6% of the invoice value of all

the products of the company sold to the firm, which amounts shall be credited

to the firms running account maintained with the company at the end of each

quarter.7.

That

the accounts between the parties will be settled half-yearly and the

credit/debit balance shall be squared up by making necessary payment6s by the

parties.8.

The

firm shall make all efforts for the promotion of the sale of the companys

products and in the event of the company being of opinion on the basis of sale

records that the firm is failing in properly performing its duty as dealer, the

company shall be at liberty to terminate this agreement by giving the firm one

months notice in writing and on the expiry of the notice period, this

agreement shall stand terminated and the parties shall settle their accounts

within a week thereafter.9.

The

company hereby agrees and undertakes to supply to the firm its products as per

the firms orders and on the company failing to supply the goods under the

firms orders ,the firm shall be at liberty to terminate the agreement by

giving the company one months notice in writing and after the expiry of the

notice period, this agreement shall stand terminated and the parties shall

settle their accounts within a week thereafter10. The

firm shall at no time sell any product of the company at a price higher than

that fixed by the company from time to time11. The

firm shall be free and entitled to appoint sub-dealers, salesmen, commission

agents or other sales personnel on salary, commission or any other basis, but

with the condition that they will function in accordance with the provisions of

this agreement and not do anything which is detrimental to the interest of the

company, or the firm and the collective interests of both.In

Witness Whereof, etc.Schedule

Reprred to Above4.

Hire-Purchase

Agreementsi

Preliminary.- Hire-purchase agreements

have acquired special importance in the developing economy of the country. What

does hire-purchase agreement connote ? By a contract of hire-purchase is meant

a contract which in addition to terms of hire, provides that on payment of the

rent for a certain period, or for a certain number of times, or on the payment

of a certain sum after such payment of rent, or at some time during the hiring,

the property in the goods hired shall (or may) pass from the owner to the

hirer. (Periars Law of Hire and Hire-Purchase 2nd Ed., p.2). In effect

hire-purchase agreement is a contract of bailment and is governed by the

provisions of Chapter IX of the India Contract Act, 1872. This agreement is

with an option to purchase though it is sometimes used in a wider sense to

include agreements where there is an irrevocable agreement to buy in Installments

are paid. A hire-purchase agreement thus creates a bailment, but is a bailment

plus an option to purchase. The transaction is composed of the element of both

the law of hire and sale, it would be clearly wrong to assimilate it to a

hypothecation of moveable property .[V. Dakshinamurthi Mudaliar v. General

& Credit Corporation (India) Ltd., AIR 1960 Mad. 328, 330].The

transaction partakes of a contract or bailment with an element of sale added to

it. In such an agreement, the owner of the goods lest them on hire for periodic

payments by the hirer upon an agreement that when a certain number of payments

by the hirer upon an agreement that when a certain number of payments have been

completed, the absolute property in the goods will pass to the hirer, but so

that the hirer may return the goods at any time without any obligation to pay

any balance of rent accruing after return; until the conditions have been

fulfilled, the property remains with the owner. In this agreement the hirer is

not bound to purchase the thing hired, he has an option, he may or may not

purchase. But in either case, if there an obligation to buy, or an option to

buy, the goods delivered to the hirer by the owners on the terms that the hirer

on payment of a premium as also of a number of Installments shall enjoy the use

of the goods, which ultimately may become his property, the transaction amounts

to one of hire-purchaser, even though the title to the goods has remained with the

owner and shall not pass to the hirer until certain event has happened, namely

that all the stipulated Installments have been paid, or that the hirer has

exercised his option to finalise the purchase on payment of a sum nominal or

otherwise. [Installment Supply (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 53, 58:

Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. State of Kerala, AIR 1966 SC 1178].iii

Hire-Purchase

agreement not sale.-It has to be remembered that a hire-purchase agreement is

not a sale even if it contains a stipulation in the form of option of the hirer

to purchase the article hired. Even where the price for sale is to be pain in Installments

later, the property in the goods passes as soon as the sale is made. This

follows from the definition of sale in section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930

(as distinguished from an agreement to sell) which requires that the seller

transfers the property in the goods to the buyer for price. The essence of sale

is that the property is transferred from the seller to the buyers for a price

whether paid at once or paid later in installments. On the other hand , a

hire-purchase agreement as its very name implies, has two aspects. There is

first an aspect of bailment of the goods subjected to the hire-purchase

agreement, and there is next an element of sale which fructifies when the

option to purchase, which is usually a term of hire-purchase agreements, is

exercised by the intending purchaser. Thus the intending purchaser is known as

the hirer so long as the option to purchase is not exercised, and the essence

of the hire-purchase agreement properly so called is that the property in the

goods does not pass at the time of the agreement but remains in the intending

seller, and only passes later when the option is exercised by the intending purchaser.

The distinguished feature of a typical hire-purchase agreement is made but only

passes when the option is finally exercised after complying with all the terms

of the agreement. (K.L. Johar & Co. vi Dy CTO, AIR 1955 SC 1082,1088).The

position of the owner of goods under a hire-purchase agreement is that of a

person who has made on irrevocable offer to sell but no obligation to buy.

(Helby v. Mathews, (1895) AC 471 ; Lee v. Butler, (1893) 2 Q.B. 318). T essence

of the hire-purchase agreement is that the hirer is not bound to purchase .

(Dalpat Rai v. Manohar Lal & Sons, AIR 1974 Raj. 61). A hire-purchase

agreement has two elements ; (I) element of bailment, and (ii) element of sale,

in the sense that it contemplates an eventual sale. The element of sale

fructifies when the option is exercised by the intending purchaser after

fulfilling the terms of the agreement. When all the terms of the agreement are

satisfied and the option to purchase is exercised, a sale takes place of the

goods which till then had been hired. [K.L.Johar & Co. v. Dy. CTO, AIR 1965

SC 1082, 1090].iiiiii

Duty

of hirer.-According to section 151 of the Contract Act, 1872, the hirer is

bound to take as much care of the goods hired to him as a man of ordinary

prudence would under similar circumstances take of his own goods of the same

bulk, quality and value as the goods hired. Under Section 152 of the Contract

Act, the hirer in the absence of any special contract is not responsible for

the loss, destruction or deterioration of the thing hired, if he has taken such

care. Accordingly, the parties may provide by stipulation in that behalf that

the hirer will be liable for any loss or damage to the goods arising from any

cause whatever.iv

Parties

.-Normally , there are two parties to the hire-purchase agreement, viz., the

owner and the hirer. However, sometimes a financier, for example in case of

motor vehicles, is also brought in as a necessary party who purchase the

vehicle from the owner and lets the same on hire to the hirer on Installments

and in such case, a guarantor is also required to be supplied by the hirer to

secure fulfilment of the obligations imposed on the hirer under the agreement.v

Clauses.-In

drafting a hire-purchase agreement, care should be taken to draft the following

important clause in the agreement properly ;a. No

obligation to buy.-The agreement of hire-purchase should not amount to an

agreement to buy but it should only give the hirer an option to purchase

because where a person under an agreement to buy obtains the possession of the

goods and the hirer under the hire-purchase agreement so obtains the

possession, he would be able to give little to any one who takes the goods on

sale or pledge from him without notice of the hire purchase agreement [See

section 30 (2) of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 and thereby the hirer would be

able to defeat the intention of the owner. Where, however, the agreement is not

an agreement to buy but it merely give an option to the hirer to buy on the

fulfillment of certain conditions, the hirer cannot gives a valid title to any

one. (Roopchand Jankidas v. National Bank, 46 Cal. 342).b. Property

in goods not to pass.-A hire-purchase agreement must contain an express

stipulation that the property in the goods shall not pass of the hirer untill

all Installments have been paid.c. Minimum

payment clause.-A hire-purchase agreement may be terminated either by the owner

or hirer and the hirer may return the article to the owner after terminating

the agreement. But since the articles are subject to usual wear and tear on

account of user, it is usual to insert a minimum payment clause in the

agreement in order to provide for depreciation of the article taken under the

hire-purchase agreement. Such a clause provides that in the event of the

agreement being determined by the owner or the hirer, the hirer shall be liable

to pay 50% of the total price after deduction of the Installments already paid

by the hirer.a.b.c.d. Seizure

clause.-It is also usual to incorporate a clause in the hire-purchase agreement

empowering the owner to seize the article hired in the event of the hirer

committing a breach of any terms thereof, particularly the non-payment of

monthly hire.iiiiiiivvvi

Claim

of financier to prevail over the state.-Where under a hire-purchase agreement,

the financier, i.e., the owner lets on hire a motor vehicle to the hirer,

clause 4 of the agreement states that, on default by the hirer, the owner can

seize, remove and retake possession of the vehicle and sue for all the Installments

due and for damage for breach of the agreement and for all the costs of

retaking of possession of the said vehicle and all costs occasioned by the

hirers default. Clause 6 would show that, only upon the hirer paying the

entire amounts due under the agreement, the said vehicle shall become the sole

and absolute property of the hirer. In regard to the registration of the

vehicle shall become the sole and absolute property of the hirer. In regard to

the registration of the vehicle, thought it is in hirers name, clause 8 of the

agreement states that the owners-meaning the financing company agree to permit

the hirer to have the registration of the vehicle in his name provided that the

hirer shall transfer the registration in the name of the owners whenever

required to do so by them and especially when the hirer commits breach of any

of the conditions of the agreement. In the light of these clauses in the

agreement and in the event of the financier seizing the vehicle on default on

the hirer in payment of the Installments, the claims of the financier would

prevail over that of the State. Where a person has got a prior secured right

over the property, the States claim will not prevail. In the Income-tax Act,

there is no substantive provision for superseding or overriding the claims or

rights of a secured creditor. Schedule II mentioned in section 222 of the I.T.

Act, 1961, which contains statutory rules in accordance with which the modes of

recovery mentioned in that section have to be exercised, relates to procedure

only and does not deal with substantive rights. [Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. RTO,

(1979) 117 ITR 334 (Ker)].vii

Allowability

of depreciation of hired article.-The Board has issued the following circular

containing instructions regarding depreciation allowance on plant and machinery

acquired under hire-purchase agreement.The

following instructions are issued for dealing with case in which as asset is

being acquired under or on what is known as hire-purchase agreement:-I.

In

every case of payment purporting to be for hire-purchase, production of the agreement

under which the payment is made should be insisted on.II.

Where

the effect of an agreement is that the ownership of the subject is at once

transferred to the lessee( e.g. where the lessor obtains a right to sue for

arrear of Installments but no right to recovery of the asset) the transaction

should be regarded as one of purchase by Installments and no deduction in

respect of hire should be made. Depreciation should be allowed to the lessee

on the entire purchase price as per the agreement.III.

Where

the terms of the agreement provide that the equipment shall eventually become

the property of the hirer or confer on the hirer an option to purchase the

equipment, the transaction should be regarded as one of hire-purchase. In such

case the periodical payments made by the hirer should not tax purposes be

regarded as made up of-a. consideration

for hire, to be allowed as a deduction in the assessment ; andb. payment

on account of purchase, to be treated as capital outlay, depreciation being

allowed to the lessee on the initial value(i.e., the amount for which the hired

subject would have been sold for cash at the date of the agreement).The

allowance to be made in respect of hire should be the difference between the

aggregate amount of the periodical payments under the agreement and the initial

value(as described above), the amount of this allowance being spread evenly

over the term of agreement. If, however, the agreement was terminated either by

outright purchase of the equipment or its return to the owner, the deduction

should cease as from the date of the termination.An

assessee claiming this deduction should be asked to furnish a certificate from

the vendor or other satisfactory evidence of the initial value (as described

above). Where no certificate or satisfactory evidence is forthcoming, the

initial value should be arrived at by computing the present value of the amount

payable under the agreement at an appropriate rate per centum. In doubtful case

the fact should be reported to the Board.[Circular

No.9 of 1943, R. Dis. No. 27(4) IT/43, dated 23rd March, 1943].iiiiiiivvviviiviii

Registration.-Registration

of a hire-purchase agreement is not compulsory.ix

Stamp

duty.-The hire-purchase agreement requires a stamp of only Re. 1 like an

ordinary agreement.x

Model

Forms


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //