Ordinary Loss - Law Dictionary Search Results
Home Dictionary Name: ordinary loss Page: 3Restitutio in integrum
Restitutio in integrum, the rescinding of a contract or transaction, so as to place the parties to it in the same position, with respect to one another, which they occupied before the contract was made, or the transaction took place. The restitutio here spoken of is founded on the edict. If the contract or transaction is such as not to be valid, according to the jus civile this restitutio is not needed, and it only applies to cases of contracts and transactions, which are not in their nature or form invalid. In order to entitle a person to the restitutio, he must have sustained some injury capable of being estimated, in consequence of the contract or transaction, and not through any fault of his own, except in the case of one who is minor xxv. Annorum, who was protected by the restitutio against the consequences of his own carelessness.The following are the chief cases in which a restitutio might be decreed:-The case of vis et metus. When a man had acted under the influence of force or...
Risk Note
Risk Note, the name sometimes given to the special contract, sanctioned by s. 7 of the Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 31), but not binding on the consignor unless signed by him and also just and reasonable, exempting a railway or canal company from liability for loss of or injury by their negligence or that of their servants to goods or animals carried by them. Both before and after the decision of the House of Lords in Peek v. North Staffordshire Ry. Co., (1868) LR 10 HL 473, in which it was held, after summoning the judges, that the contracts must be both reasonable and signed, these risk notes have occasioned much litigation; see especially Great Western Ry. Co. v. McCarthy, (1887) 12 App Cas 218, to the effect that by offering alternative rates-a higher rate with the ordinary carrier's liability, and a lower rate with exemption from liability-a company may exempt themselves from all liability except for wilful is conduct, Sutcliffe v. G.W.Ry., (1910) 1 KB 478...
Wrong, injury and damage
Wrong, injury and damage, the word 'wrong' in ordinary legal language means and signifies 'privation of right'. An act is wrongful if it infringes the legal right of another, and 'actionable' means nothing else than that if affords grounds for action in law. 'Ordinarily, the word 'injury' is used in the same sense of actionable wrong, while 'damage' in contrast with injury means loss or harm occurring in fact whether actionable as injury or not, State of Tripura v. Province of Bengal, AIR 1995 1 SC 23 (39)...
- << Prev.
- Next >>