Fraudulent Preferences - Law Dictionary Search Results
Home Dictionary Name: fraudulent preferencesFraudulent preferences
Fraudulent preferences. Every conveyances or tran-sfer of property or charge thereon made, every payment made, every obligation incurred, and every judicial proceeding taken or suffered by any person unable to pay his debts as they became due from his own moneys, in favour of any creditor, with a view of giving such creditor a preference over other creditors, is fraudulent and void as against the trustee in bankruptcy if the debtor becomes bankrupt within three months, Bankruptcy Act, 1914, s. 44; and see Companies Act, 1925, s. 265, in regard to winding-up of companies....
Preferences, Fraudulent
Preferences, Fraudulent. See FRAUDULENT PREFERENCES....
preference
preference 1 : the right to prior payment of a debt [with over the creditors of the heirs or legatees "Louisiana Civil Code"] 2 : the transfer of an insolvent debtor's interest in property to a creditor for an earlier debt that gives the creditor more than the creditor would otherwise receive (as under a bankruptcy settlement) called also voidable preference compare antecedent debt at debt, fraudulent conveyance general assignment at assignment NOTE: Preferences can be voided by a bankruptcy trustee because they diminish the bankruptcy estate out of which other creditors will be paid. Preferences must be made during a period (as 90 days before the date of filing a bankruptcy petition) established by bankruptcy law in order to be voidable. Perfection or grant of a security interest during this period is also a preference. The bankruptcy law states exceptions under which payments to creditors are not voidable preferences. 3 : priority ...
Winding-up
Winding-up, the process by which an insolvent estate is distributed, as far as it will go, amongst the persons having claims upon it. The term is most frequently applied to the winding-up of joint-stock companies.The property of a company is collected and distributed firstly in discharge of its liabilities, and secondly, among its members according to their respective rights with a view to its dissolution. If the assets are not sufficient to meet the liabilities, a company is usually wound up by the Court. In other cases the winding-up is usually voluntary and conducted by the company itself either with or without the supervision of the Court. The provisions of the (English) Companies Act, 1929, govern a winding-up in any of these three modes (s. 156). In any winding-up the members who may be called upon to contribute are ascertained and their liability determined under ss. 157-162; see CONTRIBUTORIES. Debts and claims of all kinds require to be proved and if not of certain value to be...
fraudulent conveyance
fraudulent conveyance : a conveyance of property made for the purpose of rendering the property unavailable for satisfaction of a debt or otherwise hindering or defeating the rights of creditors ;specif : a conveyance of property that is made in return for inadequate consideration by one who is insolvent or who is rendered insolvent, undercapitalized, or unable to pay his or her debts as a result of the conveyance or that is made with the intent of hindering, delaying, or defrauding his or her creditors called also fraudulent transfer compare preference NOTE: A fraudulent conveyance is generally voidable by a court or, in a bankruptcy case, by the trustee in bankruptcy. ...
Fraudulent conveyances, Statutes against
Fraudulent conveyances, Statutes against, sect. 172 of the (English) L.P. Act, 1925, now provides that every conveyance of property made either or before 1925 with intent to defraud creditors shall be voidable at the instance of any person thereby prejudiced, but the s. does not affect disentailing assurances or the law of bankruptcy, nor does it extend to conveyances in good faith either for valuable or for good consideration to any person without notice of fradulent intent. This enactment replaces 13 Eliz. c. 5 (A.D. 1570), made perpetual by 29 Eliz. c. 5. See Twyne's case, (1602) 3 Rep 80; 1 Smith's L.C. 1; Halifax Bank v. Gledhill, (1891) 1 Ch 31.The 27 Eliz. c. 4, s. 2, made perpetual by 39 Eliz. c. 18, enacts that every conveyance of lands, made with the intent to defraud and deceive any person, bodies politic or corporate, who shall purchase the same, shall be deemed (as against that person, etc.) to be utterly void. But the Act shall not be construed to defeat or make void any ...
Collusive proceeding and fraudulent proceeding
Collusive proceeding and fraudulent proceeding, there is a fundamental distinction between a proceeding which is collusive and one which is fraudulent. When a proceeding is alleged to be fraudulent, what is meant is that the claim made therein is untrue, but that the claimant has managed to obtain the verdict of the court in his favour and against his opponent by practising fraud on the court. Such a proceeding is started with a view to injure the opponent, and there can be no question of its having been initiated as the result of an understanding between the parties. While in collusive proceedings the combat is a mere sham, in a fraudulent suit it is real and earnest, Nagubai Ammal v. B. Shama Rao, (1956) SCR 451: AIR 1956 SC 593 (599). [Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882), s. 52]...
Stolen property or property fraudulently obtained
Stolen property or property fraudulently obtained, the words 'stolen property or property fraudu-lently obtained' merely denote the attribute or characteristic of the property. If the property is capable of being described as 'stolen property' or 'property fraudulently obtained' by whomsoever it might have been stolen or fraudulently obtained, that would be sufficient to comply with the requirements of the s.. The s. merely speaks of the character of the property - whether it satisfies the particular description and does not say by whom it should have been stolen or fraudulently obtained, Champaklal Ganeshmal v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1975 SC 160 (162): (1975) 3 SCC 485: (1975) 3 SCR 584. [Bombay Police Act (22 of 1951), s. 124]...
Preference
Preference, means prior right, advantage, pre-cedence etc., Sher Singh v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 200: (1984) 1 SCC 107.The expression 'preference' amongst others means prior right, advantage, precedence etc. It signifies that other things being equal, one will have preference over the others, Sher Singh v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 200 (204): (1984) 1 SCC 107: (1984) 1 SCR 464. [Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, s. 47(1H)]The 'preference' envisaged in the Rules, cannot mean, an absolute en bloc preference akin to reservation or separate and distinct method of selection for them alone. A mere rule of preference meant to give weightage to the additional qualification cannot be enforced as a rule of reservation or rule of complete precedence, Andra Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Y.V.V.R. Srinivasulu, (2003) 5 SCC 341 (348): AIR 2003 SC 3961.The expression 'preference' means an equitable apportionment of vacancies reserved for backward classes, Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR 199...
Preferred
Preferred, 'preferred' is a word of dual import; its semantics depend on the scheme and the context; its import must help, not hamper, the object of the enactment even if liberty win language may be necessary. Black's Law Dictionary gives the following meaning: PREFER: To bring before; to prosecute; to try to proceed with. Thus, preferring an indictment signifies prosecuting or trying an indictment. To give advantage, priority, or privilege; to select for first payment, as to prefer one creditor over others. Thus it may mean 'prosecute' or effectively pursue a proceeding or merely institute it. Purposefully interpreted, pre-ferring an appeal mean more than formally filing it but effectively pursuing it, Commissioner of Income Tax v. B.N. Bhattacharjee, AIR 1979 SC 1725 (1734): (1979) 4 SCC 121: (1979) 3 SCR 1133.Preferred, is a word of dual import; its semantics depend upon the scheme and the content; its import must help, not hamper, the object of the enactment even if liberty with la...
- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial